User talk:SamhainStrode

November 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Perdona nuestros pecados (Mexican TV series), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 07:27, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hello, I'm Andrzejbanas. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Andrzejbanas (talk) 02:25, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Martin (1977 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Slasher. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Film nationality redux

Editors have told you before to not make changes to the nationality of a film without reliable sources. Sometimes you add sources that aren't very good, and other times you remove existing sources that don't support your claims. I'm not reverting Hellraiser because I'm not sure about the details of 247Hub, but can you explain this edit? 70.163.208.142 (talk) 20:26, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Hellraiser" is a co-production between the United States and Serbia, there are production companies from both countries such as the American Spyglass Media Group and the Serbian 247Hub. In other cinematographic cases, the movie "Evil Dead Rise" appears here on Wikipedia as on many other internet pages as an American movie, but companies from New Zealand and Ireland were also involved, also in the final credits you can confirm this information as it appears that Ireland and New Zealand co-produced the aforementioned film. This has made me discover that many internet sites that Wikipedia calls Reliable Sources have incomplete and even incorrect information. We should start seeing the information shown in the end credits of many movies instead of the information from the internet. SamhainStrode (talk) 02:30, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You might have a case if the end credits say "international co-production", not sure how you'd cite that but you can make a case for yourself on a particular film's talk page. Doesn't explain your edit for Summer of 84, some of that film was obviously funded by an American studio. 70.163.208.142 (talk) 04:20, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will say that there's an administrator that seems to share your sentiment.[1] Just find better sources, or communicate that the film credits convey such information. 70.163.208.142 (talk) 21:07, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Scout Taylor-Compton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mexican.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Laura Harring. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:41, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Laura Harring, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Ethnicity should generally not be in the lead unless it is relevant to the subject's notability, per MOS:ETHNICITY Sciencefish (talk) 11:38, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Laura Harring. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please do not add ethnicity to the lead per MOS:ETHNICITY. She is an American having relocated to the US when ten. Sciencefish (talk) 09:54, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. You have been warned about this before. Please stop changing the nationality of films based on unreliable sources. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 17:55, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 15:29, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Star Mississippi 01:13, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been warned and continued to edit against consensus and as such I have temporary blocked you from editing. When unblocked you'll also need to communicate with other editors about why you're making the changes you are and establish consensus for them. Star Mississippi 01:14, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit _(blether) 16:16, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note that, despite what the block templates above says, I've extended your block because you were evading your block by editing while logged (see WP:LOUTSOCK). Don't do that. Girth Summit _(blether) 16:17, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Emiliogogo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:22, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]