User talk:Salzano1

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Funny Car page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Lyght 09:45, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

December 2019

Hello, I'm MrOllie. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. [1] MrOllie (talk) 20:37, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Taft–Hartley Act. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 23:42, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Please help. I disagree that my edit was objectable in any way. I would like a second person to explain to me what is wrong. I replaced a dead source with a live one that was nearly identical. One user keeps reverting my edit without cause.

You are involved in a content dispute at Taft-Hartley Act. You feel the reference you have added is reliable. MrOllie contends that it is a blog and not reliable. What you need to do now is discuss the matter at Talk:Taft-Hartley Act and see if the editors of the article can come to a consensus about whether the reference is reliable. You may also ask for guidance about whether the reference is reliable at WP:Reliable sources noticeboard.

You may not, however, keep trying to re-add it to the article. —C.Fred (talk) 23:51, 16 December 2019 (UTC)