User talk:Salut65

November 2016

Creating a duplicate copy of an existing page is very rarely helpful, and frequently very unhelpful. If the page is an "Articles for creation" submission, then having two copies of it is likely to waste time of the volunteers who review such submissions, as both of them are likely to be subjected to the same review. Also, it is never acceptable to copy content from one page to another without saying that yo are doing so in your edit summary, as doing so infringes the copyright of the original authors of the content, since Wikipedia's copyright licensing terms require attribution for any copying. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:50, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am new to this.. so it was a mistake to resend a copy, as for some reason I could not find my own that i made. can u please check and let me know which is good thx --Salut65 (talk) 22:43, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anzhelika Tahir has been accepted

Anzhelika Tahir, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 02:52, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Madeeha Naseer (January 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Our standards for these subjects are explicitly selective and what's here is simply not significant to satisfy them and there's no automatic inherited notability from anything or anyone else.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Madeeha Naseer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 22:40, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What of we change her actual real name to Madeeha Naseer to her Media name Diya Ali plus I have more news articles. --Salut65 (talk) 02:38, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Madeeha Naseer concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Madeeha Naseer, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:04, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Salut65. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mrs. Pakistan World (March 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AaqibAnjum was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mrs. Pakistan World and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mrs. Pakistan World, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 21:58, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Salut65! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 21:58, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Could you let me know what areas need to be worked on? I know the categories are missing? Because I still cant understand why the article is not accepted even though its resources are very strong links and credible sources. Salut65 (talk) 11:15, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Salut65:, I've left you a message on my talk page. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 13:17, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@AaqibAnjum:,I left a message for u on the page as well. please advise if u got my explanation. Salut65 (talk) 12:18, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mrs. Pakistan World has been accepted

Mrs. Pakistan World, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 05:25, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Muskan Jay for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muskan Jay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muskan Jay until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 08:56, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the news sources in regards to her career as Mrs. Pakistan and as a singer. Is there any way you can stop the deletion and I can move it to my talk page or something . please let me know. Salut65 (talk) 09:02, 23 April 2020 (UTC) There are many articles on beauty queens - P lease check this in India - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manpreet_Brar and this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carolina_G%C3%B3mez and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelle_McLean and many more. --Salut65 (talk) 22:45, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Diya Ali for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Diya Ali is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diya Ali until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 09:51, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This article has very strong news articles and interviews. Please do check the references. This article was approved, so please advise why is it nominated for deletion as the news articles are from The Tribune, Dawn and many others. Please advise. Salut65 (talk) 09:54, 23 April 2020 (UTC) She is the first winner of the only pageant for Pakistan. Due to the political and religious turmoil in Pakistan, there is no Miss Pakistan or Mrs. Pakistan. If you look at other beauty queens, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manpreet_Brar as well as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carolina_G%C3%B3mez and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paula_Andrea_Betancur[reply]

There are tons of beauty queens on wikipedia. Fame does not only means movies and becoming actresses, they have contributed to participating in the worlds only pageant for pakistan that sends them to international pageants.

Salut65 (talk) 21:48, 23 April 2020 (UTC) There are many articles on beauty queens - P lease check this in India - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manpreet_Brar and this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carolina_G%C3%B3mez and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelle_McLean and many more --Salut65 (talk) 22:44, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello Salut65. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Salut65. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Salut65|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 11:00, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am a pageant fanatic and also strive to get Pakistan's name in pageants. I run a pageant instagram account called pageantsaroundthe world. Thats why its my hobby to write. All this links that I have accumulated is because of me being an avid follower of pakistan's pageant. Salut65 (talk) 21:50, 23 April 2020 (UTC) You have gone on to delete almost everything on all the pageants of pakistan. Why is that? How come you think they have not contributed to any sort of fame. This seems more as a personal agenda to me. They have very strong links with Pakistan writing about them. Do you have something against the pageant system in general. As it seems you are on some sort of a path where you want their existence to leave forever. Salut65 (talk) 21:54, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There are many articles on beauty queens - P lease check this in India - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manpreet_Brar and this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carolina_G%C3%B3mez and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelle_McLean and many more. Salut65 (talk) 22:44, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:MistyGraceWhite. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 00:15, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass fellow Wikipedian(s) again, as you did at User_talk:MistyGraceWhite, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. I asked nicely that you go back to assuming good faith with this editor and work out your problems in the appropriate AfD discussions. MistyGraceWhite also asked nicely that you take the problems to the appropriate AfD discussions as well and stop leaving comments on their TP. Yet, you have continued with your harassment and baseless accusations of prejudice. And now you are making comments like " It is only a matter of time" which by even the narrowest scope can be construed as a threat. Please cease the harassment and/or take any issues you have to the appropriate AfD discussions. Sulfurboy (talk) 00:17, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Salut65, you must not do this much heck. I had told you on my TP that AfD is normal routine of Wikipedia. Provide a better rationale on the deletion discussion, the article shall remain on Wikipedia. I checked a number of these articles, including Aatka Feroz, I did not found any third party reliable reference for it, except one. You should look at WP:1E for some guidelines. Your copy pasting the same thing on each AfD is not right. It is not good. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 01:27, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AaqibAnjum,

I am not talking about her deletion of articles. She has removed a lot of citations about a good 50 from the pageants pages. Not the winners. She did it in such a manner that one cannot even revert back to the original document. She can go ahead and delete what she wants to. Anyways, I have mentioned that she can do as she wishes. There is no one helping to work on the page Miss Paksitan World and the person who started the contest. She then went on to say I am a paid member and I am receiving payment and that I should disclose it. Again I repeat myself, that deletion of pages is not my issue. She her removed over 50 important news articles from pages of Sonia Ahmed and Miss Pakistan World. That is why I am pointing it out to her that she shuld not have done so. I am not harrassing the user. I gave my opinion in a very proper manner. Plus I have given examples of the pages that are pertaining to pageants. Again I am not saying anything about the pages nominated for deletion, I could care less, but yes the user went n 24 hours and nominated all the pages for deletion. Shanzay Hayat is a page that should have never been nominated for deletion yet it is. Anyways, I am no longer going to comment on the user's page. As for me her agenda is quiet clear. Salut65 (talk) 02:11, 25 April 2020 (UTC) Salut65 (talk) 02:11, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Using Edit Summary

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 01:18, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sonia Ahmed, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjabi. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sonia Ahmed, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trans.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Areej Chaudhary, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kashmiri.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Areej Chaudhary

Main issue is that a few references are from IMdB, which is not regarded as the most reliable source for articles - see WP:IMDB. Those should be replaced with more reliable sources such as major newspapers for example. Dl2000 (talk) 01:42, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I did upload a some very relevant links but for some reason the message is still there on the page about unreliable sources.

www.pakobserver.net/areej-chaudhary-miss-pakistan-world-opens-up-about-her-success-journey/

www.urdupoint.com/en/showbiz/areej-chaudhary-miss-pakistan-world-aiming-1792206.html

www.app.com.pk/domestic/dhai-chaal-movie-life-dream-project-to-unveil-truth-about-balochistan-areej-ch/

All this shows her work and her previous work in the film industry.

Please check.

Thanks Salut65 (talk) 01:49, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anniqa Jamal Iqbal moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Anniqa Jamal Iqbal. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:11, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]