User talk:Salihu44

Welcome Salihu44!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 48,317,453 registered editors!

Hello, Salihu44. Welcome to Wikipedia!

I'm S0091, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

To help get you started, you may find these useful:

The Five Pillars (fundamental principles) of Wikipedia

A Primer for Newcomers

Introduction to Wikipedia

Wikipedia Training Modules

Simplified Manual of Style

Creating a new article via the Article Wizard

When editing, follow the 3 Core Content Policies:

1. Neutral point of view: represent significant views fairly

2. Verifiability: claims should cite reliable, published sources

3. No original research: no originality; reference published sources

Brochures: Editing Wikipedia & Illustrating Wikipedia
Ask a Question about How to Use Wikipedia
Help

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.

Sincerely, S0091 (talk) 16:21, 26 September 2020 (UTC) (Leave me a message)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mayanka Waterfalls has been accepted

Mayanka Waterfalls, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 13:23, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cherryfield College (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cabrils was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Well done on creating the draft, and it may potentially meet the relevant requirements (including WP:GNG, WP:NCORP) but presently does not. As you may know, Wikipedia's basic requirement for entry is that the subject is notable. Essentially subjects are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. To properly create such a draft page, please see referencing for beginners or the article Easier Referencing for Beginners. Please note that the current references do not establish notability. I appreciate the sincereity and good faith in this draft however for it to be accepted it must meet the notability criteria. Please familiarise yourself with these pages before amending the draft. If you feel you can meet these requirements then resubmit the page and ping me and I would be happy to reassess. As I said, I do think this draft has potential so please do persevere!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cherryfield College and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cabrils (talk) 22:32, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Salihu44! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Cabrils (talk) 22:32, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cabrils, I have updated the references please kindly review.

Thanks

Salihu44 Salihu44 (talk) 21:35, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cabrils.

I have added more notable references to the page. Please Review Salihu44 (talk) 10:33, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You were asking for help on IRC #wikipedia-en-help, but didn't wait long enough for a response.

The main problem with your draft is that it is lacking sources that provide in-depth coverage of the school. You do have some sources, but the main text of your draft is not apparently based on any of them. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 09:46, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Calibrils, You reviewed my draft for the article about Cherryfield College on March 29. Following your suggestions, additional secondary sources have been added to the page to help qualify the article for Wikipedia. If there is anything else you can think of to help this article get approved quickly, please let me know. Salihu44 (talk) 17:11, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cherryfield College has been accepted

Cherryfield College, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.