User talk:Saleem100
Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hello! Saleem100,
you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! hajatvrc @ 04:38, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
|
pig
[edit]August 2012
[edit]Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Saleem100, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! DaL33T (talk) 15:30, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 17:37, 26 August 2012 (UTC)- I would like to add that your history, both in the context of page blanking and warnings, is confusing. You appear to have blanked pages that you yourself recently created. That is permissible if your intention is to have the article speedily deleted. However, you then approached another editor and asked that editor to revert your blanking. That caused some consternation in its implementation, at least on one of the articles. Then, that editor removed the warnings they had placed on your talk page. Putting all that aside, you also blanked pages for which you could have no legitimate basis for doing so, including Wikipedia pages and articles like God and Domestic pig. These blankings tipped in favor of a block.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:43, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Important battles in medieval Indian History for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Important battles in medieval Indian History is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Important battles in medieval Indian History until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. A boat that can float! (watch me float!) 18:17, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
The article Taxes in middle age (India) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- An article that seems to systematically confuse middle age, the middles ages and race-based taxation. The only reference is obscure, to say the least.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:21, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of List of battles in medieval India for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of battles in medieval India until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.