User talk:Sakamura

Re: Questionable Edits {sic}

Pardon me, but what "bot" and what "questionable edits" do you speak of? Is there any reason why, pray tell, "this bot" - which has supposedly "been doing some edits to Titles {sic} changing the second to third words in the title of a section to lower case {sic; it's "lowercase", as in one word} instead of one {sic; "a"} capitalized letter" - shouldn't "do" such "questionable edits"?

Yes, there is a reason; please read:

“

Capitalization

Capitalize the first letter of the first word and any proper nouns (e.g. names of people, places, etc.) in headings, but leave the rest lower case. Thus "Rules and regulations", not "Rules and Regulations".

”

It is in the Manual of Style (headings)#Capitalization. Cheers.

What are "questionable edits", and why do you say this, in addition to suggest that this is a "bot"? Qwerty (talk) 08:47, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clearing up the misunderstanding Ishmael Rufus 18:50, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Sakamura, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Qwerty (talk) 08:47, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

future CHICOTW

Nominate your article if you feel it is eligible.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 01:45, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So Sorry

I'm so sorry about the rvv. But will you please delete your post from my user page? Please leave your message on Talk Page. Thank you.--Oda Mari 20:01, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your generosity. --Oda Mari 20:19, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Superlink

I have created a disambig page for Superlink, as you requested. Biscuittin 12:39, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Meetup

Sakamura - you've previously expressed interest in a Chicago wiki-meet. If you're interested in coming to another one, take a look at Wikipedia:Meetup/Chicago 3 and let us know your thoughts. best — Dan | talk 18:39, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CHICAGO survey

WP:CHICAGO

You have been marked as an inactive member of WP:CHICAGO since you have not updated your status at Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/members. If you consider yourself either an active or semi-active member of the project please correct your status. If you consider yourself a member you may want to get involved in the Wikipedia:Meetup/Chicago 3. Also, if you are a member, be advised that the project is now trying to keep all the project's WP:PR, WP:FAC, WP:FAR, WP:GAR, WP:GAC WP:FLC, WP:FLRC, WP:FTC, WP:FPOC, WP:FPC, and WP:AFD discussion pages in one location at the new Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/Review page. Please help add any discussion you are aware of at this location.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 16:49, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CHICAGO leadership

This month you have indicated new or continuing interest in WP:CHICAGO as either an active or semi-active member. The response to the project membership survey was strong enough that we should attempt to organize it in a more fully functional way. Please sign up at Wikipedia:CHICAGO/leadership if you would be willing to serve as a leader of the project from September 1, 2008 to February 28, 2009. The various leadership responsibilities are listed there. The roles will be somewhat similar to the roles of Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Coordinators. We are a less mature and developed project than WP:MILHIST however, so our division of roles will be slightly different. Please respond by the 23rd.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 18:55, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Top-importance Chicago articles

For the rest of this month we are looking for more candidates to be promoted to Category:Top-importance Chicago articles. We are hoping to bring the list of category members to a total of 50. Either you have participated in past votes and discussions or you have recently signed up to be a part of WP:CHICAGO. In either case, please come visit Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chicago/Assessment where we are determining who to add to the September 1st ballot. Some candidate debates have lingered, but there are many new ones from the project's top 50 according to the Wikipedia:Release Version 0.7. Help us determine which pages to add to the ballot.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 04:09, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CHICAGO voting for Top-importance Chicago articles

Your status has been changed to inactive at Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/members since you did not respond to our confirmation of active status request. If this is an error please come update your status. Also feel free to come vote at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Chicago/Assessment#Current_Top-importance_Candidates for our next Category:Top-importance Chicago articles. Voting continues until September 10 and nominations/discussions are ongoing for future ballot candidates at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chicago/Assessment.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 02:12, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Pumping Station: One, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 22:18, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of I.c.stars

The article I.c.stars has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 98.28.12.216 (talk) 15:54, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pumping Station: One for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pumping Station: One is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pumping Station: One until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dawnbails (talk) 19:05, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]