User talk:Saira-ajmal-22

Nano-Naphrology

Nano-Naphrology: Revolutionizing Renal Medicine

introduction:

At the nexus of nephrology and nanotechnology, the area of nano-naphrology is rapidly developing, with the goal of using creative Nano-scale treatments to address the complex problems in renal medicine. Because they can now alter matter at the nanoscale, researchers are coming up with new ways to diagnose, treat, and track kidney ailments with previously unheard-of accuracy.[1]

Understanding Nano Naphrology:

Nephrology is the study and practice of kidney disease, such as hypertension [2] electrolyte abnormalities, as well as the management of patients requiring renal replacement therapy, such as those undergoing dialysis or undergoing kidney transplantation. [3]

A nephrologist is a medical professional who specializes in the diagnosis and treatment of kidney disease.[4] The study of healthy kidney function, kidney disease, kidney health preservation, kidney disease treatment (including dialysis and kidney transplantation) and dietary changes is known as nephrology.

Nephrologists [5] also study systemic problems that directly affect the kidneys, like diabetes and autoimmune diseases, as well as conditions that result from kidney disease, such as hypertension and renal osteodystrophy.

Applications of Nano Naphrology in Renal Medicine:

Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery Systems: The field of nanophrology utilizes nanoparticles as vehicles for specific medicine delivery to the kidneys. By specifically accumulating in renal tissues, these nanoparticles can be designed to reduce systemic adverse effects and improve therapeutic efficacy.

Nanoengineered Renal Replacement Therapies: There are some drawbacks to conventional renal replacement treatments including hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. The study of nanoengineered materials for next-generation renal replacement therapies , such as bioartificial renal tissues and artificial kidneys, is known as nanophrology.[6] Saira-ajmal-22 (talk) 08:15, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TechnoSquirrel69 was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Thanks for your submission! In addition to the writing work that needs to be done, please also note that Wikipedia is not a reliable source. You can replace citations to Wikipedia articles with the actual references contained within that article that verify the information. Let me know if you have any questions! (please

mention me on reply; thanks!)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Saira-ajmal-22/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 06:26, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Saira-ajmal-22! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 06:26, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Saira-ajmal-22

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Saira-ajmal-22 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Nobody (talk) 10:38, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 1AmNobody24 was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Saira-ajmal-22/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nobody (talk) 10:39, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Saira-ajmal-22/sandbox

Hello, Saira-ajmal-22. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Saira-ajmal-22/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:07, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]