User talk:Saihimesh

New messages will appear at the bottom of this page.

Welcome!

Hello, Saihimesh! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Bill william compton^Talk 05:42, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

April 2011

It would appear that you created a hoax wikipedia page at 2011 Samsung Championships Cup. Why? It is in the process of being deleted. While this may have seemed fun it has now called into question every page you have ever edited on wikipedia. I would suggest you go back and remove any dubious edits from the past before someone checks them (which they will) and finds another purposely incorrect error. A warning can be given to each occurrence with a block happening if too many are found. Please do your best in the future to keep your edits truthful for the betterment of wikipedia. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:56, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Noline Mẽŕaqövā

The article Noline Mẽŕaqövā has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

no references

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Tbennert (talk) 04:30, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I left a message on the article's talk page as the page appears to be a hoax though the evidence was not strong enough for WP:CSD#G3. As the article, and its talk page, will likely be deleted soon because of the PROD here is what I wrote on the talk page: I don't think there's a 1.07 meter tall pro tennis player that's not on any of the main tennis web sites.[1][2][3] --Marc Kupper|talk 18:35, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Further evidence this is a hoax - using the ITF player search at http://www.itftennis.com/womens/players/index.asp

A search for a player named Mẽ% gets zero hits.
A search for a player named Me% gets 219 hits. In that list there is no player with ", No" (searching for the first name). I also checked for "lin" and while that pulled up a number of names none of them were similar to Noline Mẽŕaqövā.
A search for all players in Montenegro returns 11 records. Many have birth dates in the 199s implying Noline's 10 May 1992 should have been included. None of the 11 player names listed are similar to Noline Mẽŕaqövā.

It appears this editor is including either hoax articles, or completely unverifiable articles, among good edits. For example, he/she created 2011 Dow Corning Tennis Classic and that I verified as essentially correct and added a ref to the ITF web site for this. I did not double-check the full list of player names. Related to this are 2011 Dow Corning Tennis Classic – Singles and 2011 Dow Corning Tennis Classic – Doubles which I did not verify. --Marc Kupper|talk 21:33, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Sania Mirza. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Bill william compton^Talk 09:43, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Olga Kalyuzhnaya

A tag has been placed on Olga Kalyuzhnaya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ThePCKid (talk) 05:44, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Olga Kalyuzhnaya

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Olga Kalyuzhnaya, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion notice, which will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 06:13, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ITF links in Manisha Malhotra etc

When you make a link, please always check that it goes where you expect it to go. ITF leads to a disambiguation page: I assume that you want International Tennis Federation rather than any of the others (TaeKwondo, Iraqi Turkmen Front, etc), but as the editor it is your job to get it right - you know what you mean, so it's easier for you than for someone coming along later. Please check your links to save everyone's time. Thanks, and Happy Editing! PamD (talk) 19:21, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brittany Teei for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brittany Teei is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brittany Teei until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Courcelles 21:40, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kim Jin-hee

The article Kim Jin-hee has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Regards, SunCreator ^(talk) 14:42, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Hyderabad Open 2005 with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bentogoa (talk) 05:28, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, 2005 Hyderabad Open

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, 2005 Hyderabad Open. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Hyderabad Open 2005. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Hyderabad Open 2005 - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Meph^talk 08:11, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicating articles

Recently, you created 2005 Hyderabad Open despite the existence of an article already covering the same subject: Hyderabad Open 2005. If involved in a dispute over content, please consider discussing it on the relevant talk page. Creating duplicates is an inappropriate response to dispute resolution. Thanks. Meph^talk 08:16, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to Hyderabad Open 2005, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. Bentogoa (talk) 07:16, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Delia Sescioreanu

The article Delia Sescioreanu has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Miyagawa (talk) 12:02, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at ~~2005 Hyderabad Open~~ Hyderabad Open 2005, you may be blocked from editing. — Mr. Stradivarius ^♫ 09:45, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, I'm not really sure what you have against the page being titled ~~2005 Hyderabad Open~~ Hyderabad Open 2005, but you should discuss it on the talk page rather than simply blanking all the content, and you should really provide a reason for the change. (You might be interested in reading WP:RM for renaming pages that are likely to be disputed.) If you have any questions, feel free to ask me here. All the best. — Mr. Stradivarius ^♫ 09:51, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - the above comments should be about the Hyderabad Open 2005 article. The article 2005 Hyderabad Open was a competing version that Saihimesh created. --Marc Kupper|talk 23:56, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, sorry, that was my mistake. I've updated the messages to reflect this. — Mr. Stradivarius ^♫ 14:10, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed move of "Hyderabad Open 2005" to "2005 Hyderabad Open"

Please see Talk:Hyderabad Open 2005#Proposed move to "2005 Hyderabad Open". --Marc Kupper|talk 19:51, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Whitney Jones

A tag has been placed on Whitney Jones requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bgwhite (talk) 07:38, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please read...

I urge you to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia:NTENNIS, which identifies how we determine whether a tennis player should have an article. While there may be rare examples of players who do not meet any of these criteria, and still qualify as notable, if they do not meet any of these criteria, you'll have to be prepared to justify why they are an exception.

You are going to a fair amount of effort creating a number of articles that are not appropriate for Wikipedia, and you are creating work for volunteers to delete these articles. If you would like to discuss the criteria for inclusion, let me know, and I'll help you find the right place for the discussion.--SPhilbrick T 18:54, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'd also urge you to look at Referencing for beginners. Adding a link to a site with a bullet point is not an example of an acceptable reference. If you mean to add them as External links, that is fine, but it means many of the articles you have created do not have any references.--SPhilbrick T 19:25, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Whitney Jones

Please don't re-add an article that was speedy deleted without adding information that would make her notable. She fails the conditions of WP:NTENNIS in that she never won a $25,000 title or above. Bgwhite (talk) 07:21, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Whitney Jones

A tag has been placed on Whitney Jones, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bgwhite (talk) 07:22, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Whitney Jones and 8 other articles created by you for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Whitney Jones and 8 others are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The articles will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whitney Jones until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

The following other articles are up for discussion: Nudnida Luangnam, Conny Perrin, Galina Fokinā, Olga Kalyuzhnaya, Alizé Lim, Tara Iyer, Prerna Bhambri and Alison van Uytvanck. Bgwhite (talk) 23:44, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Sania.Mirza.2011.Wimbledon.Championships.abc123.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Sania.Mirza.2011.Wimbledon.Championships.abc123.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Roh^G??· 10:58, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Mann.Kee.Awaaz.Pratigya.Hindi.Soap.Opera.India.Star.Plus.Channel.abc123.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mann.Kee.Awaaz.Pratigya.Hindi.Soap.Opera.India.Star.Plus.Channel.abc123.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — Bill william compton^Talk 08:37, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Sania.Mirza.2010.Commonwealth.Games.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Sania.Mirza.2010.Commonwealth.Games.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:05, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Sania.Mirza,2005.Hyderabad.Open.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Sania.Mirza,2005.Hyderabad.Open.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:06, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Sania.Mirza.2010.Commonwealth.Games.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Sania.Mirza.2010.Commonwealth.Games.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:28, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Sania.Mirza,2005.Hyderabad.Open.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Sania.Mirza,2005.Hyderabad.Open.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:29, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jessica Pegula

The article Jessica Pegula has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has failed to win any tournament. She HAS NOT received a wildcard entry into the main draw of any WTA tournament. She has played and lost in the qualifying rounds of a three WTA tournaments, but never made it to the main draw. Fails WP:NTENNIS

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 05:50, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stop creating player articles

Please stop creating player articles in the manner you are currently doing them. Please follow Wikipedia:WikiProject Tennis/Article Guidelines on how to create a tennis player article. Saying a player has won "many" ITF when they have won one or two is misleading. Plus saying absolutely nothing about a player is a great disservice as it says nothing about the player. Bgwhite (talk) 05:55, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Korina Perkovic

The article Korina Perkovic has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Bgwhite (talk) 05:57, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wang Qiang (tennis)

The article Wang Qiang (tennis) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has not won a $25,000 or above tournament. Was not in the main draw of the U.S. Open. She lost in the first round of the qualifying draw. In order to be notable, she has to make it to the main draw. Fails WP:NTENNIS

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 06:06, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Taylor Townsend (tennis)

The article Taylor Townsend (tennis) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

She has not won any tennis tournaments. She has not been in the main draw of any WTF tournament, only the qualifying draw of the US OPEN. Fails WP:NTENNIS

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 06:07, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jessica Pegula

A tag has been placed on Jessica Pegula requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:17, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wang Qiang (tennis)

A tag has been placed on Wang Qiang (tennis) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:23, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Taylor Townsend (tennis)

A tag has been placed on Taylor Townsend (tennis) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:25, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:Sania.Mirza,2005.Hyderabad.Open.jpg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Sania.Mirza,2005.Hyderabad.Open.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.newslivetv.com/news/images/21050_b.jpg. As a copyright violation, File:Sania.Mirza,2005.Hyderabad.Open.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Sania.Mirza,2005.Hyderabad.Open.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Sania.Mirza,2005.Hyderabad.Open.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Sania.Mirza,2005.Hyderabad.Open.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Sania.Mirza,2005.Hyderabad.Open.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 16:40, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Sofia Sabljarević, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. You have created 4 pages now in the last couple days that have had to be deleted because of biographies that are not notable. You have been warned by multiple users and the pages in question have shown up on your talk page. It looks like most of your photos have also been removed. Do you realize you will lose your page creation and editing ability if you continue this course? Please read the "Wikipedia:WikiProject Tennis/Article Guidelines" before you do anything tennis related here on wikipedia. Fyunck(click) (talk) 02:33, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Partial retraction. It Appears that Taylor Townsend and Jessica Pegula were just given wildcards into the doubles at the US Open. That certainly qualifies them for inclusion. This was not noted on the atp or itf sites. In the future would you please note their notoriety qualification when creating an article? Thanks and sorry. Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:35, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sofia Sabljarević

A tag has been placed on Sofia Sabljarević requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 02:39, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2005 Dubai Tennis Championships – Women's Singles Qualifying for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2005 Dubai Tennis Championships – Women's Singles Qualifying is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2005 Dubai Tennis Championships – Women's Singles Qualifying until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Pesky (talk …stalk!) 11:05, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dalila Jakupovič

The article Dalila Jakupovič has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has not won a $25,000 or above tournament. Has not played in the main draw of a Grand Slam. Fails WP:NTENNIS

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 03:33, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Your addition to File:Mb-manisha-asiad02-med-1.jpg has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Fut.Perf. ☼ 05:57, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you upload a media file with false or missing copyright or source information, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:00, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:42, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I just wanted to let you know that I took a look at your recently created article 2005 PTT Bangkok Open – Singles-- Jipinghe (talk) 18:25, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of NewGiza International

The article NewGiza International has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:35, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the tag. All womens International events are notable per project tennis guidelines. I know in the past that this particular editor has added many dubious entries but in this case he is correct that it is notable. Fyunck(click) (talk) 00:02, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Creating redirects

When you make a redirect please use the syntax #REDIRECT Page Thanks in advance, →Σ ⚑ ☭ 04:47, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you do this? Please reply. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:32, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you are not going to use the correct syntax for creating redirects, please stop and wait for another editor to create it. As I said above, the correct way to redirect a page is to use #REDIRECT Page. →Σ τ c. 02:16, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please use this code to create redirects. The ones you are making do not work. --Danger (talk) 05:33, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move

You created Nirupama Sanjeev by means of a copy&paste. This was wrong. You should have moved Nirupama Vaidyanathan to Nirupama Sanjeev. Not only would this have preserved the edit history, it would have created a redirect at Nirupama Vaidyanathan automatically and in the correct format! I have now corrected the situation. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:47, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Urdu station fashion

A tag has been placed on Urdu station fashion requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. →Σ τ c. 01:12, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Uuuub

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Dac04 (talk) 20:22, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Naabu

A tag has been placed on Naabu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 20:54, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. →Σ τ c. 05:33, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Tara.Iyer.IND.Tennis.Player.abc123.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tara.Iyer.IND.Tennis.Player.abc123.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Danger (talk) 05:37, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problems

You have uploaded File:Hamari.Devrani.Hindi.Soap.Opera.Star.Plus.Channel.India.abc123.jpg, File:201210042904logo.jpg, File:Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon .jpg, File:Navya.StarPlus.png which appear to be from http://starplus.startv.in/ . I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Danger (talk) 05:53, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

As you've been told before, redirects are made like this: #REDIRECT [[]] Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 10:23, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for continued creation of bad redirects after being warned many times. Competence is required for Wikipedia editing, as is willingness to respond to criticism and correct one's errors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Danger (talk) 18:23, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Saihimesh for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. →Σ τ c. 02:11, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Block extended

Your block has been reset to expire in two weeks from this date due to block evasion. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia in any way while you are blocked, other than to edit this page to appeal your block. You may do so by posting {{unblock|1=your reason here}} below this message. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 03:23, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Saihimesh for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. →Σ τ c. 05:01, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Intertitle of Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Intertitle of Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:48, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Intertitle of Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Intertitle of Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aaron Booth (talk) 03:45, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Olga Kalyuzhnaya for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Olga Kalyuzhnaya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olga Kalyuzhnaya until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jared Preston (talk) 10:45, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Intertitle of Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Intertitle of Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:13, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of NewGiza International

The article NewGiza International has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable source available for the existence of this event. Is not listed as part of the 2012 WTA Tour.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wolbo (talk) 12:03, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Andrea Benítez

The article Andrea Benítez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable per tennis guidelines. No WTA main draw appearances, no Fed Cup, no $50k tournament wins (or $25K wins before 2007), no notable junior career, does not meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fazzo29 (talk) 16:40, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lisa Sabino for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lisa Sabino is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Sabino until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:16, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Saihimesh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi there, I understand I have been blocked due to mistakes I have made in the past, however I am a committed editor and would appreciate it if you could unblock me. I have absolute no intention to disobey any Wikipedia guidelines or add any incorrect information, in-fact I always try my best to contribute positively to Wikipedia. It has also been a long time since my account has been blocked, and believe I jave served the time for any mistakes I have made. So, please, accept my request and unblock my account so that I can start contributing to Wikipedia, which is something I enjoy.

Decline reason:

As this is an exact copy of the unblock request made at User talk:Bardolivaaro, including the same typing error, it looks like you are still abusing multiple accounts. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:53, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Identical unblock request also at User talk:Patelhime. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:22, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]