User talk:Sahiman Junaid

Welcome!

Hello, Sahiman Junaid!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:00, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you sir Sahiman Junaid (talk) 19:00, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello, I'm Rejoy2003. An edit that you recently made to Bonifacio Dias seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Rejoy²⁰⁰³(talk) 19:01, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Sahiman Junaid (talk) 19:09, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Non-Shia Practices of Muḥarram in South Asia and the Diaspora: Beyond Mourning, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Wiiformii (talk) 19:07, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Sahiman Junaid (talk) 19:09, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Pradeep Antony. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Wiiformii (talk) 19:08, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok Sahiman Junaid (talk) 19:09, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Wiiformii (talk) 19:11, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm adding 'Short description' and 'DEFAULTSORT' in pages. Sahiman Junaid (talk) 19:12, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And doing it incorrectly at times. Also, you are adding and subtracting whitespace. And you are doing multiple edits on a single page rather than a single edit, which causes problems for those evaluating the page history. Is there some reason you are editing so quickly? — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:14, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm enjoying it Sahiman Junaid (talk) 19:15, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which means I enjoy doing this ...

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Daniel Case (talk) 20:11, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sahiman Junaid (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry Sir. I was just doing good work.Sahiman Junaid (talk) 20:14, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:35, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sahiman Junaid (talk) 20:14, 3 July 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Spicy (talk) 20:31, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Omobranchus obliquus/Kayleeso (July 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Omobranchus obliquus instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Omobranchus obliquus/Kayleeso and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:45, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sahiman Junaid! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 20:45, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Sahiman Junaid. Thank you for your work on Sant Ram. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

this should be a disambiguation page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:09, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]