Jump to content

User talk:Sage of the Six Paths

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Sage of the Six Paths, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Reference errors on 23 July

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pokemon XY

[edit]

Please do not move the XY pages from their current generic designations of Part 1 and Part 2. We are waiting to see what the official North American distributor, Viz Media, will call Part 2 before deciding on further renaming actions. Current renaming edits will risk breaking page redirects. Thank you for your patience. —KirtMessage 01:54, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm ScrapIronIV. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of Yu-Gi-Oh! Arc-V characters, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Scr★pIronIV 13:38, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of Noragami characters

[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of List of Noragami characters, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.cartesiuslyceum.info/vwo/c.kranenburg/noragami_menu.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:48, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, List of Horizon in the Middle of Nowhere characters

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, List of Horizon in the Middle of Nowhere characters. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Horizon in the Middle of Nowhere. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Horizon in the Middle of Nowhere – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Cult of Green (talk) 03:17, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Samurai Warriors (anime), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nene and Yuka Saito. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

God Eater (anime)

[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of God Eater (anime), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://m.ezcosplay.com/anime-costumes/god-eater.html. It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues. If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:16, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited God Eater (anime), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BS 11. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Explain your reverts at WWE 2K16

[edit]

Do you mind explaining your questionable reverts at 2K16? Soundtrack listings are inappropriate for articles per this page. Read that page I just linked you to. Plain and simply put, it says "No lists of songs in articles ever". I have explained to you four times now why lists of songs are inappropriate yet you refuse to say anything. If you continue to revert without explaining then I will revert your addition as unproductive vandalism. Lastly, when making any revert ever, it is very highly recommended that you explain your revert by providing an edit summary. The page where you save a revert says at the top to explain. When editors don't explain their questionable reverts, it gives off the impression that they aren't here to be productive users because that's so often what vandals do. So yeah: Why are you reverting? Explain your reverts like I have done. Or you could just stop. —DangerousJXD (talk) 05:39, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Read this link right here. It specifically says "do not include tracklists". What don't you understand? DO NOT just revert people. Post here. Your reasoning isn't good enough. It goes against the guidelines. Plain and simple. No listings of soundtracks in articles. —DangerousJXD (talk) 01:01, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
So why do you keep reverting without explaining? It's one of the most irritating things you can do here. Just say why you think it's appropriate to disobey what are essentially rules. Your edits are pretty much vandalism. —DangerousJXD (talk) 08:21, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited A Certain Magical Index: The Movie – The Miracle of Endymion, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nozomi Sasaki and Hiroyuki Yoshino. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:41, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

[edit]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at WWE 2K16 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Katietalk 10:20, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yu-gi-oh future airdates

[edit]

Re: your edits here, where is the evidence of a January 10, 2016 air date? You've used the same reference for something like 4 episode air dates, and I only see a December 20th value on the screen, nothing in January. Feel free to reply here. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:54, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All anime are going to be on break for a week and start airing again after New Years. Sage of the Six Paths (talk) 17:03, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You haven't adequately answered my question. Where in the reference provided above are the specific air dates mentioned? I see more unsourced dates that you added here--where are the references? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:37, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There from the Australia tv guide for the english dub Sage of the Six Paths (talk) 02:36, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
And that reference can be found where? Is it this? Where is the January air date? Where does it indicate that Memories of the Beast is slated to air on December 27? If a date is being indicated, it needs to be backed with a reference. Since you added the future dates back to the article, the burden is yours to support the content. If you can't support the dates with references, you shouldn't be adding them. If there's something that I'm missing, I'm happy to reconsider, but in the interim I'm removing the unsourced dates. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:45, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Neuro

[edit]

Hello, I'm CatcherStorm. An edit you recently made to List of Neuro: Supernatural Detective characters seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CatcherStorm talk 02:04, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a test I'm creating a page for the characters and not done editing it.Sage of the Six Paths (talk) 02:07, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add "Fairy Tail Season 8"

[edit]

I see that you have contributed to Wikipedia by adding List of Fairy Tail episodes (season 8) in light of the upcoming Fairy Tail Zero anime adaptation and are making sure it is accounted for on other articles. However, the seasons listed on Wikipedia are grouped according to the episode count provided on the official Funimation website (seen here) as it is the only verifiable season count available. Without proper citation, the addition of any further seasons strictly falls within the realm of original research and does not warrant their inclusion. As such, I've taken the liberty of reverting your edits. Unless you can properly cite the adaptation as a new season and not a part of the current season (as well as any further content beyond that), I'm going to have to ask you to refrain from making such additions until further notice.

Nothing personal, since I see the season 7 list is getting pretty long, so a split is bound to happen sooner or later; however, steps are being taken to properly manage the article. You can find the discussion here. I hope you understand. User:Immblueversion (talk) 04:12, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Neuro: Supernatural Detective characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hiroyuki Yoshino. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of Yu-Gi-Oh! Arc-V episodes. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Diff: [1] Your previous explanations were poor, your previous sources were poor, and I'm noticing a questionable pattern of disruptive unsourced edits by IPs, followed by your questionable and unsatisfying clarifications after the article gets protected. Per WP:BURDEN the onus is on you to submit a reliable published source after content is disputed. If you're not able to do that, you might want to sit out for the duration of the dance. Saying "It was announced during Episode 87 airing" is not sufficient. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:45, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It should be obvious to you if you watched the episode it announces at the end that it will air on January 10 due to a week break.Sage of the Six Paths (talk) 08:48, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I don't watch the show. So how do you plan to bring the dates into conformity with WP:V given that information? Reliable published sources should be your go-to. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:58, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Yu-Gi-Oh! Arc-V episodes. Diff: [2] Per WP:ONUS, when you reinstate unsourced content, the burden is yours to provide a reference. You again did not do this. You're basically one unsourced addition away from having your account blocked. I'm not sure why this has been so confusing, but as previously mentioned, all content must be verifiable, and adding reliable published sources as references is the way to make that happen, and to avoid the almost inevitable block. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 09:00, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Reikenzan: Hoshikuzu-tachi no Utage

[edit]

Hi, I've moved your article to the draft namespace because it was not fleshed out enough to be an encyclopedia article. A stub is still required to clearly establish the notability of a subject. I would advise you to work on such articles in your sandbox or draft space first. You may consult this WikiProject page for a non-comprehensive list of reliable animanga sources. Opencooper (talk) 12:42, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I need help with this page, so if anybody have more info for it they can edit it too. Sage of the Six Paths (talk) 21:47, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've fleshed out the anime section a bit. It could still do with some more expanding, but I hope that helps. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 15:17, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Reikenzan poster.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Reikenzan poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:57, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Johanna. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Cross Ange— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Johanna(talk to me!) 20:43, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Yu-Gi-Oh!: The Dark Side of Dimensions. You have been asked several time to provide a source for this information. Now you've provided the name of a magazine. You're halfway there. Now you need to WP:CITE the specific issue of that magazine -- provide an in-line citation. If you restore the information without doing so, you will be blocked from editing. If additional mysterious anonymous editors restore the information without citing a source, they will be blocked and the article will be edit protected. Verifiability is a core policy of this project. SummerPhDv2.0 06:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Omni Flames. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Gundam Build Fighters without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Omni Flames (talk contribs) 06:09, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I created a new page for the content I removed.Sage of the Six Paths (talk) 02:20, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

About Fairy Tail Season 8 article.

[edit]

I see you have undone the redirect to List of Fairy Tail episodes (season 7) for the new episodes to come after Fairy Tail Zero is complete. However, seeing as how the official season count is verified only by Funimation's release, we unfortunately have no way of knowing what season the new episodes will be counted as until they air. It could be season 8. It could be season 9. For whatever reason, it could even go back into season 7. The fact of the matter is, until we know for sure, the inclusion of a "Season 8" article still fails verifiability guidelines. I suggest we wait until March 18 for Episode 276 to be simulcast on the Funimation website before we jump ahead of ourselves and make a new article. User:SubZeroSilver (talk) 03:08, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've created a temporary section on the List of Fairy Tail episodes article for the upcoming episodes to go until its official Funimation season can be verified. User:SubZeroSilver (talk) 03:19, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Gundam Reconguista in G characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chiaki Takahashi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your addition to List of Durarara!!×2 episodes has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. —Farix (t | c) 00:27, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as List of Durarara!!×2 episodes, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.durarara2usa.com/story/ten13.html http://www.durarara2usa.com/story/ten14.html http://www.durarara2usa.com/story/ten15.html http://www.durarara2usa.com/story/ten16.html http://www.durarara2usa.com/story/ten17.html http://www.durarara2usa.com/story/ten18.html http://www.durarara2usa.com/story/ten19.html http://www.durarara2usa.com/story/ten21.html http://www.durarara2usa.com/story/ten22.html http://www.durarara2usa.com/story/ten23.html http://www.durarara2usa.com/story/ten24.html https://www.funimation.com/shows/durarara/videos/official/a-tiger-dies-and-leaves-his-skin https://www.funimation.com/shows/durarara/videos/official/walking-on-thin-ice, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing. If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

March 2016

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted, as you did at List of Durarara!!×2 episodes. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:05, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have suspended your editing privileges because you added back copyrighted content after you were warned by TheFarix not to add copyrighted content. Wikipedia takes copyright violations seriously. You have two prior copyright violation warnings on your talk page, further, you created List of Maken-ki! characters, List of Maken-ki! episodes, List of Aldnoah.Zero characters, List of Aldnoah.Zero episodes, List of Gundam Reconguista in G characters and lord knows how many other articles, as improper copy/paste moves, without providing proper attribution per WP:CWW. I don't know what your perspective is, but the community's perspective is that plagiarism weakens the project, it doesn't strengthen it. When your block expires, please go to each article you've created by copy/pasting, and add the proper attribution. At this point, that means you'll have to go to each talk page, fill out the following template, and place it at the top of the page.
{{Copied|from=|from_oldid=|to=|diff=}}
Please do this within a reasonable amount of time, or I will suspend your editing privileges again until you demonstrate an understanding and appreciation for our copyright policies. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:18, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This is what they should look like: [3] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:30, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sockpuppetry: You, the user behind this account, are not permitted to edit at Wikipedia for as long as your account block is inactive. Your edits from this IP and from this IP constitute sockpuppetry, which is not permitted. If you wish to edit your favorite articles, the easiest way to do that is to start adhering to our content guidelines and copyright policies, and to do so from your account after your block expires. Editing while logged out and other forms of sockpuppetry will result in further account and IP blocks, as well as the protection of our articles from your disruption. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:04, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not split character articles

[edit]

Please do not split off character lists from articles without significant reasons. There is recent discussion on WT:ANIME regarding whether such articles are necessary when they are not properly sourced or notable. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:22, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Animanga lists

[edit]

Hi. Anime titles should be italicized. You also shouldn't leave empty space at the beginning of articles. Additionally, it would be great if you could add {{WikiProject Anime and manga}} to the talk page of articles you create so they can be tracked and rated. Lastly I strongly suggest you start utilizing the {{Copied}} template to properly attribute your page splits, as Cyphoidbomb so kindly explained to you above. Happy editing and let me know if you have any questions. Opencooper (talk) 09:27, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of The Seven Deadly Sins episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Seven Deadly Sins. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article splits

[edit]

When splitting articles you should specify the target page in the edit summary, and the source page in the edit summary for the new page. For example Moved to article b and moved from article a. This is for attribution reasons.SephyTheThird (talk) 09:56, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:03, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked again for editing while logged out, including when you were under administrative sanction. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
My block expired when I signed back on again after three days. Sage of the Six Paths (talk) 23:29, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sage of the Six Paths (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I stopped adding copyright info and been only fixing certain pages. Sage of the Six Paths (talk) 23:42, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were clearly editing logged out to evade your previous block, as per evidence below. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:28, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As noted above, I'm pretty sure you were editing while logged out, like your edits here and here, some of which included silent reversions and removal of copyright templates, along with the restoration of closely paraphrased content (i.e. copyvios) like here. This follows the same pattern of behavior I first noticed you taking part in at List of Yu-Gi-Oh! Arc-V episodes, where you'd submit unsourced content again and again, sometimes through silent reversions[4][5][6][7][8] then, only after the page was protected, would you log in to make the same basic changes.[9] You were clearly editing while logged out when you made this silent reversion and this change. You should not be editing while logged out. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:05, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't feel like signing in for everything I want to edit. Also for Toriko, I only add new information when the chapters and volumes are released. Sage of the Six Paths (talk) 00:26, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Why were you editing when you were under administrative sanctions? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:53, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I just told you, the block expired and I was able to edit again. Sage of the Six Paths (talk) 02:04, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You were blocked on March 15 for 72 hours. These edits[10][11][12][13][14][15] were made on the 16th, while your account was blocked. I have genuine concerns about your problematic editing style. Over the months I've seen you make numerous unsourced edits despite requests that sources be added, I've seen you silently restore unsourced content that was legitimately removed per WP:CRYSTAL, I've seen you add hokey references that do not adequately support airdates (for instance), I've seen you add plagiarized content, I've seen you silently restore this plagiarized content,[16] I've seen you restore the plagiarized content after changing a few words around, (this is clearly just this) and you made these changes while you were under adminstrative sanctions. I'm not sure I understand what's going to be different if the block is lifted. The submission of plagiarized content is mind boggling to begin with, but the resubmission of it, and the edit-warring with TheFarix over it, is simply astounding. There's also the matter of the numerous articles you split without providing proper attribution. So we have a few issues to discuss before you are unblocked. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:56, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
AngusWOOF and SephyTheThird already told me about discussing with other people before splitting pages for characters since they might not be important all the time. Plus, I told you that I don't always sign in to edit and my IP Address wasn't block. Also, the only reason I restored those summaries for Durarara!! x2 was because I was going to try rewriting them with my words. Sage of the Six Paths (talk) 05:45, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Like I already said just because the account was block, the IP Address' wasn't. I'm done repeating myself. Sage of the Six Paths (talk) 21:58, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So you are admitting that you were purposely evading your block. On top of that, you were doing so to reinstate the plagiarized content that had previously been removed, then flagged for copyright violations. —Farix (t | c) 11:04, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Your not listening, I was going to rewrite those summaries. Sage of the Six Paths (talk) 17:48, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Remedy of attribution problems

[edit]

Hi there. May I ask when you plan to remedy the attribution problems you created when you made your copy/paste article splits? As noted above, each of the articles you split needs proper attribution. I took care of one of them for you, to demonstrate how to format the {{copied}} template. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:54, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Toonami, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Reference used must actually support content added Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:45, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:21, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This indefinite block is for this edit, where you introduce content that can be found verbatim here and various pages at toriko.wikia.com. I genuinely don't comprehend why you go out of your way to be a nuisance or to deliberately ignore copyright policy, but note that you are no longer welcome to edit at Wikipedia for as long as this account is blocked. That means that you are not welcome to edit at all, whether logged in or out. Editing as an anonymous IP editor or creating another account to evade your block constitutes WP:SOCKPUPPETRY and will not be tolerated. Indefinite blocks are not infinite--you are free to request an unblock, but any edit you make while this block is in effect that can be attributed to you, may be reverted by any user without any regard for whether it was constructive or not. You will also need to demonstrate some comprehension of why you were blocked, the relevant copyright policies (as well as WP:TONE, since you absurdly pasted content that had exclamations, interrobangs and rhetorical questions.) Note that competence is required at Wikipedia, so demonstrating an ongoing inability to adhere to established guidelines and policies raises serious questions about your competence. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:29, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What's the comprehension I gotta doSage of the Six Paths (talk) 06:18, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Beyblade Burst.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Beyblade Burst.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. B-bot (talk) 17:32, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sage of the Six Paths (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know I was out of line and I would like to edit again. After reading the guidelines about this stuff I understand what they mean. I'll just have to calm down and talk it out instead.

Decline reason:

This is alarmingly unspecific given your extensive history of copyright violations, your block evasion, and your offensive personal attacks. While we'd certainly consider an unblock request, you are going to have to be much more specific and convincing. Yamla (talk) 23:14, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Sage of the Six Paths (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know I was out of line personal attacks on other users and I would like to edit again. After reading the guidelines about copyright violation and block evasions, I understand that I shouldn't have broke them. I'll just have to calm down and talk it out instead. I will also hope while talking it out this we can be more refine like instead going through some edit war. I honestly just want to edit again. Also, I wasn't trying to evade the blocks on purpose as the block expired on the IP address' faster than this account and sometime change automatically.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sage of the Six Paths (talk • contribs)

Accept reason:

I am willing to give you another chance, since you have acknowledged that you have had problems in the past, and have said that you will avoid then in future. I really do hope you can edit from now on without similar problems, but please read the comments below from me and Cyphoidbomb about what is likely to be the result if you do slip back into old habits. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:52, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to let another admin review your unblock request for maximum fairness, but I have to say, every decision you make, like your decision to engage in sockpuppetry when you were expressly told you were not allowed to edit here so long as this account was blocked, or your continuation of copyright infringements at that new sock account, or your recent choice to refactor the last declined unblock and remove the declined notice instead of, oh, say, opening a new unblock request or simply responding to Yamla--it all raises questions about your fitness to edit at Wikipedia, and whether or not you even believe that rules apply to you here. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:39, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I explained everything to you, but your still missing certain details. Sage of the Six Paths (talk) 01:01, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You might want to explain it again so the reviewing admin is fully up to date on your answers. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:05, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with almost all of the comments that Cyphoidbomb, who is a very fair and reasonable administrator, has made. I do, however, think it was probably a mistake to say that you "refactored" a declined unblock notice: it seems to me fairer to take the view that you simply removed it, and posted a new unblock request in its place, probably not knowing that you are supposed to leave declined unblock requests in place as long as the block is in force.
Sage of the Six Paths, you have done a lot of unhelpful things, several of which Cyphoidbomb has explained to you, both in the messages which can be seen above, and in earlier messages which have been removed. I am also conscious of the fact that you have persistently been dishonest in the past, which makes it hard to trust you now. Despite all that, you say that you understand what you did wrong and will try to avoid doing the same again, and I am willing to give you a chance to prove that you mean it. I am therefore considering unblocking you, on the understanding that any repetition, even a small one, of any of the problems you have shown in the past will lead to the block being restored, with much less chance that it will ever be lifted again. Cyphoidbomb has said above "I'm going to let another admin review your unblock request for maximum fairness", which I assume means that he is willing for an administrator to unblock you without consulting him again, but even so I will wait a while to give him (or any other administrator) a chance to comment on my proposal to unblock you if they wish to. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:39, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I concede the point about the "refactored" decline/unblock. I'll gladly yield to JBW's judgment here. I will remind Sage of the Six Paths that any unsourced changes will be grounds for blocking, and any copyright violations will be as well. The user needs to stop editing while logged out as well. During the CU check, Bbb23 described the number of this user logged-out edits as "staggering". User has previously attempted to escape scrutiny by editing while logged out, which will also not be looked up on favorably in the future. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:00, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My IP's

[edit]

Hey "JamesBWatson" (talk), I still need my IP Address through since I still can't edit without them. Sage of the Six Paths (talk) 23:41, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

JamesBWatson, I've taken care of the unblock of 76.116.196.115. I originally lifted the hard block, but decided to unblock entirely so long as Sage of the Six Paths does not edit while logged out. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 07:59, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your addition to List of Mobile Suit Gundam Unicorn episodes has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Seriously, why were you even unblocked in the first place? You've gone back do doing the exact same thing that got you blocked in the first place. —Farix (t | c) 00:08, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going back to the same way, I just didn't know the summaries were copyrighted that's all. Sage of the Six Paths (talk) 01:46, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sure you did, because you read the copyright guidelines. Or so you claimed in your unblock request. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:55, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No cause then I wouldn't have gone through all of this and I'm not using the IP's either. Besides I'm also talking it out like I said I would too. Sage of the Six Paths (talk) 01:57, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Huh? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:07, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You sound confused a little. Sage of the Six Paths (talk) 02:08, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon with clock
I recently unblocked this account. Before doing so, I told you that if I did so it would be on the understanding "that any repetition, even a small one, of any of the problems you have shown in the past will lead to the block being restored". Since then, there have indeed been repetitions of some of the problems you have shown in the past. The most serious of these is a return to adding copyright infringing content. I see that at User talk:Cyphoidbomb you have attempted to defend your copyright infringing, in part by claiming that you misunderstood what copyright was, and in part by a sequence of obscure messages, the meaning of some of which is difficult to figure out, but they appear to include bizarre claims such as that you wrote content which you didn't know was word-for-word the same as existing content on another web site. Either you are attempting to wriggle out of the copyright issue by lying, or else you are showing such a gross inability to communicate, and to follow others' communications, as to make it doubtful that you have the competence to contribute to Wikipedia. It actually doesn't make a lot of difference which of those it is, because either of them is another "repetition of some of the problems you have shown in the past", in addition to the copyright infringement After everything that has been said to you in the past, if you still can't manage to avoid such problems as those within two days of being unblocked conditionally on avoiding such problems, then it really seems unlikely that you will suddenly now start editing without similar problems. It is not reasonable to leave you unblocked knowing that doing so will result in other editors having to spend endless time cleaning up after you, trying to explain to you what the problems with your editing, and so on. (For example, you have been receiving messages about copyright infringement since last November, and you have claimed to have read the relevant guidelines, and to have understood them, but the problem still continues.) I unblocked you in the hope that you would be able to edit from now on without continuing the same kinds of problems as before, but I have now reluctantly accepted that that is not likely to happen, and so I have restored your indefinite block. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:34, 1 August 2016 (UTC) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:27, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm wasn't dodging the questions, I gave him the links to the two episodes I just added. And I also told him that the rest were from episodes 1-14, which are also on the same wikia site. Sage of the Six Paths (talk) 21:05, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hey User talk:Cyphoidbomb, I was being truthful and I gave you the links to the two episodes I got the summaries from. Plus, I thought you were gonna check the rest of episodes on Gundam wikia. Sage of the Six Paths (talk) 21:09, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You linked to this page as the source of the content you copied "months ago". (Or more likely, three weeks ago as TheFarix pointed out.) But when you added that content on July 5th, that article didn't exist at Wikia yet. It was created July 18, 2016 according to the edit history. I don't see any deletions in the page logs. I don't know how you would explain that, but it looks to me like you're lying about where you got the content. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:27, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No, I linked this page for episode I just did yesterday, that's what I thought you were talking about. The rest of the episodes I did three weeks ago are right here, Episodes 1-13. Sage of the Six Paths (talk) 23:36, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Where did you get the episode summary for Clash of the Two Unicorns that you posted three weeks ago? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:01, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Clash of the Two Unicorns is separate from the ones I did three weeks ago. I did that one on July 31, and got the summary from here on Gundam wikia. Sage of the Six Paths (talk) 01:30, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is getting confusing. It looks as though your recent editing was probably done in good faith, Sage of the Six Paths, but you still need to be more careful over copyright. Cyphoidbomb and I have now agreed to unblock you again, so I have lifted the block, but I strongly recommend that you don't copy anything from anywhere, to make perfectly sure that there is no risk of copyright. Also, Cyphoidbomb may have further advice or instructions to give you: if so, please take careful note of what he says. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 07:50, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The last indef was the result of some confusion. I should have checked more closely to see if the content pasted at Clash of the Two Unicorns was submitted at the same time this user submitted the other plot summaries as Kaido of the Beasts, because to me it looked like Sage was restoring copyrighted content already removed from the article. So I apologize for that. However, the block was ultimately in response to another copyright violation committed by Sage of the Six Paths, who copied prose from Wikia without proper attribution. Sage, all prose is considered copyrighted once "fixed" (published). See Berne Convention. This includes song lyrics, episode summaries, even your personal blog posts. While there are some exceptions, generally speaking, and for the sake of you being able to edit again, you may not reprint prose the way you did. I advise you to steer far away from any inclination to add a plot summary or any other prose to an article. Even close paraphrasing can be problematic. Do yourself (and the rest of us a favor) and do not add prose to articles unless it is 100% written from scratch by you in your own voice. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:03, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have twice lifted indefinite blocks from your account to give you another chance on the basis of your assurances that you would not continue the problems that led to your being blocked, but I have now restored the block. After what was said to you by myself and Cyphoidbomb in relation to your earlier blocks, I thought that you would have the sense to abstain from posting content that you had copied from other web sites, but you have not done so. Here are two examples. (1) At List of Naruto: Shippuden episodes (season 20) on 4 August you added content which was word-for word identical to content which had been on the web page http://www.sidereel.com/tv-shows/naruto-shippuden/season-12/episode-188 from 28 July; that web page is clearly marked "Copyright © 2016 SideReel, member of the RhythmOne group. All Rights Reserved." (2) At List of One Piece episodes (season 18) on 19 August 2016 you added content which was word-for word identical to content which had already been published on several web sites, such as https://lostgemini2032.wordpress.com/2016/08/09/one-piece-episode-752-the-new-warlord-the-legendary-whitebeards-son-appears/ where the content had been present since 9 August. I have therefore restored the indefinite block. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock again, but my judgement is that you have had enough "last chances". The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:29, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Since posting the block message above, I have discovered several more copyright infringements in your editing history since I lifted your last block, including some which infringed the same copyrights that were the subject of a removal under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, as recorded here. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:49, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sage of the Six Paths (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I checked the links that JamesBWatson posted and don't use sidereel or wordpress despite identical content. Plus, after checking this link, I'm not the only one that edit on Naruto Shippuden (season 20). Now I know most users are sick of me, but I just want to help. I even rewrote most of those summaries so this wouldn't happen. Sage of the Six Paths (talk) 22:11, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm not sure what you're trying to argue here, that you entirely by coincidence happened to independently reproduce 1kb of the same content, typos and all, or that you took the content from somewhere else. I wouldn't believe the first, and the latter does not address the issue in the least. Huon (talk) 22:33, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hey "JamesBWatson" (talk), I didn't copyright from these sites and I checked that DMCA complaint, all of that wasn't me. There is no way I could do all of that by myself, besides I explained you what I did before, I don't use all these websites only wikia. Sage of the Six Paths (talk) 05:40, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  1. I wasn't suggesting that the DMCA complaint related to your editing: I was just pointing out that some of the content you posted has been the subject of a DMCA complaint, indicating that the copyright owners do take the matter seriously, and it is not just some technical breach of copyright that nobody will ever bother about.
  2. I couldn't care less where you copied the content from, as long as you copied it from somewhere. I gave two examples, where in each case I cited a web site where I knew the content had existed before you posted it, to show that you had copied it in violation of copyright: I neither know nor care whether you copied it from those sites or from somewhere else. What I do care is that the content had already been published before you posted it, that you copied from somewhere, and that copying it violated copyright. In connection with your previous blocks, Cyphoidbomb, TheFarix and myself all told you not to copy anything: look above, and you will see "don't copy anything from anywhere" and"do not add prose to articles unless it is 100% written from scratch by you in your own voice" and "You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words". If you copy from somewhere like wikis on Wikia about cartoon series, which are pretty well 100% written by children who either haven't a clue about copyright or don't care about it, or most likely both, then the likelihood that you are copying something which someone else has copied in violation of copyright is high. (If the stuff you copy from one of those Wikia wikis doesn't even look as though it was written by a child, then it is even more likely that it was copied from somewhere, almost certain in fact.) You were repeatedly warned not to copy anything at all from anywhere, but you went ahead and kept on copying stuff. It seems likely that you don't understand what you were told, in which you lack the competence to edit Wikipedia, because you won't be able to avoid making the same mistakes again and again and again. If, on the other hand, you do understand what you were told and deliberately choose to ignore it, then you can't be trusted to edit Wikipedia. In either case, unblocking you would not benefit the project. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:27, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That's why I rewrote some of those summaries so I could avoid this problem here. I use the wikia summaries as a base because it has the important parts for the episodes. I already know that, I even read the Berne Convention so we wouldn't go through this. I'm not ignoring the warnings you all gave me. Sage of the Six Paths (talk) 15:56, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I was very clear about this (or at least I thought I was) in my last comment to you, when I wrote:
I advise you to steer far away from any inclination to add a plot summary or any other prose to an article. Even close paraphrasing can be problematic. Do yourself (and the rest of us a favor) and do not add prose to articles unless it is 100% written from scratch by you in your own voice.
By your own description, you are not writing content that is 100% written from scratch by you, you are "[using] Wikia summaries as a base" and then making changes on top of it. You could not possibly have thought that's what I was advising you to do, and I'm at a loss for what to say. Some people are good at certain things and some people are not. I'm sure you're good at a lot of things that other people are not good at. There's no crime in not being good at writing episode descriptions from scratch yourself, but there is a huge problem when you try to do it the way you've been doing it, and I gotta tell you, just as a general life-lesson, that sometimes you have to recognize your own personal limitations. I'm no good at parkour, which is why you don't see me backflipping off rooftops. There's no shame in saying "I'm not so great when it comes to writing plot summaries--I tend to rely too heavily on source material--maybe I'd better let someone else do this." That was the realization I was hoping you'd have the last time we went through this. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:45, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I told you that before, summaries are hard for me and when I try to write one, I usually end up making them too long or excessively detailed. That's why its easier for me to rewrite it in my own words so it won't end up as copyright material. I had two examples to show you but the links were crossed out on List of Naruto: Shippuden episodes (season 20) and List of One Piece episodes (season 18). Sage of the Six Paths (talk) 17:53, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sage of the Six Paths (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to edit again after already explaining why I was blocked for on my talk page. Sage of the Six Paths (talk) 21:49, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This request indicates neither an understanding of the extent or nature of your errors nor a willingness or ability to correct them. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 10:26, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sage of the Six Paths (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I finally understand that I can't so other summaries even though it's easier to rewrite them. I'll just leave to other users who can write them better than me. Sage of the Six Paths (talk) 15:38, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You've previously made these promises. You've repeatedly broken them. I'm sorry, but this has been going on for months. I think at this point, unblocking you would be a guarantee of future copyright violations. Yamla (talk) 15:45, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppetry

[edit]

After the prior unblock decline, this user logged into a confirmed sockpuppet account, Kaido of the Beasts (talk · contribs), and requested that account be unblocked. The user also blanked two prior unblock declines on that account. Given the continued bad behaviour, I strongly advise not unblocking this user for at least six months, and you'll want to be very, very certain it's appropriate to do so after that long. The user has repeatedly shown a complete disregard for Wikipedia policies, even while specifically promising to uphold them. --Yamla (talk) 01:36, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I did not break my promise, I was keeping my end of the deal and even changed my style of putting info on Wikipedia. I was refraining myself of putting copyrighted stuff up. But you what even after all this repenting, nobody just doesn't me anymore. Sage of the Six Paths (talk) 04:51, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Done, FOREVER

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sage of the Six Paths (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Decline reason:

In the light of your long history of copyright violations, together with your apparent inability or unwillingness to comprehend copyright policy here, and this in the face of repeated promises from you to change your behavior, I believe that allowing you to edit here would not be in Wikipedia's best interests. Your sockpuppetry is an additional reason not to release your block.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:21, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I didn't break my promise, Anthony Bradbury and I was working on my copyright problems too. As for the sockpuppetry, User:Kaido of the Beasts is dead forever. Sage of the Six Paths (talk) 23:18, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It's not just Kaido of the Beasts (talk · contribs), either. There's been block evasion as IPv4 and IPv6 addresses, too. The most recent edits are from late August and the most recent request to be unblocked to continue evading the block was from less than 24 hours ago. At this point, I really think someone should revert your talk page access, but I'll not do it yet. --Yamla (talk) 23:59, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I already told User:Cyphoidbomb and User:JamesBWatson that the IP addresses change automatically on their own and they might be used by other people that's why I requested that unblock 24 hours ago. Like I said, I really do be trying to talk this out but I'm tired of repeating the same thing to every different user I talk with. Sage of the Six Paths (talk) 00:18, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
These are very clearly you. --Yamla (talk) 02:21, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sage of the Six Paths (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is all I know on Wikipedia, I already spilled my guts and put everything back on my talk page. I just don't know what to say anymore. Sage of the Six Paths (talk) 00:45, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Talk page access revoked - use WP:UTRS. PhilKnight (talk) 02:10, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Sage of the Six Paths (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16533 was submitted on Sep 15, 2016 05:18:51. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 05:18, 15 September 2016 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Sage of the Six Paths (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16545 was submitted on Sep 16, 2016 23:31:05. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 23:31, 16 September 2016 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Sage of the Six Paths (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16552 was submitted on Sep 19, 2016 00:17:43. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 00:17, 19 September 2016 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Sage of the Six Paths (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16585 was submitted on Sep 24, 2016 06:12:08. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 06:12, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 29, 2016 - Unblock discussion

[edit]

As a note, another discussion took place here to explain yet again why this editor was blocked. They still appear to not get it, or they're just trolling. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:One Piece DVD 17.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:One Piece DVD 17.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:53, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sage_of_the_Six_Paths&oldid=1141412656"