User talk:Safi1919

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article Mohammed Asif Safi, please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 23:21, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Mohammed Asif Safi

Salamoona.. It looks like you are related to Mohammed Asif Safi.. I have reverted your edit at Pashtun people and I might have to revert some of your other edits as well.. What you are doing is promoting an ordinary army general across Wikipedia.. I don't see why it is important to add anything about Mr. Safi at articles like Mohammed Daoud Khan, Mohammad Hashim Maiwandwal, Afghanistan, Pashtun people, Gardez and so on. There are tens of other army generals or military men from Afghanistan who are way more notable than him. Please do read WP:PEOPLE (Ketabtoon (talk) 21:54, 11 December 2009 (UTC))

File copyright problem with File:Medal for Mohammed Asif Safi.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Medal for Mohammed Asif Safi.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:01, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Gul Pacha Ulfat

Salamoona, I hope you are doing well. You added the following incomplete sentence to Gul Pacha Ulfat's article "Ulfat along with Ghulam Hassan Safi, Abdul Hadi Tokhay, Mohammad Rasul Pashtun, Fayz Mohammad Angar, Qiamuddin Khadem, Ghulam Mohayuddin Zurmulwal, Abur Raof Benawa, Nur Mohammad Taraki, and others."..

And, about Amanullah Sailaab Sapi's article, you are welcome to add extra content.. I hope we can expand the article.. (Ketabtoon (talk) 22:37, 31 December 2009 (UTC))

Disambiguation link notification for December 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pashtun tribes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Safi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mohammad Gul Khan Momand, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cabinet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:15, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mohammed Asif Safi, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pashto, Founder and Instructor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Safi1919. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Safi1919. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

March 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. --HistoryofIran (talk) 22:05, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

My edits were historically accurate and true. This page was contained false information about. Ghazni is province of Afghanistan and Bayhaqi is an Afghan not Iranian. Why would revert this true information? Are an Iranian agent and spreading Iranian propaganda? Safi1919 (talk) 22:28, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Please avoid casting aspersions and personal attacks. If you continue this or keep altering (sourced) information (WP:TENDENTIOUS), you will be reported. --HistoryofIran (talk) 22:35, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Sure you can report me and I can report for spreading Iranian propaganda. Answer this basic question, is Ghazni in Afghanistan or not? What is Ghaznavid empire has anything to do with Iran, except ruling over present day Iran? Safi1919 (talk) 22:39, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Afghanistan didn’t exist at that time, history doesnt work like that. And sure, I’ll gladly report you. HistoryofIran (talk)

Did Iran existed at that time? Afghan people always existed, and we Afghans have always been aware of dirty Iranian propaganda and falsehood. Iran is the biggest spreader of terrorism, shiaism, and falsehood in world. It won't work on Afghans. I will gladly report as an agent of Iran as well. Safi1919 (talk) 23:14, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:24, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Indefinite block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for harassment.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 23:37, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Good afternoon, I have falsely reported by user HistoryofIran for simply correct his spread of misinformation on one of the pages. I respectfully request for the block to be removed.

This user seems to working on some of mission to purposely paint Afghan historical figures with the name Iranians or Persian.

It is common sense that province that he refers are in Afghanistan. But somehow he inaccurately calls them Persian. This is simply wrong. This user should not be allowed to spread this misinformation on whomever's behalf.

I am more than happy to debate and correct all of his misinformation.

Please remove the block and allow me to flag all of the misinformation by this user.

Thank you Safi1919 (talk) 00:05, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

As the block message states, you were blocked for harassment, which is what that report concerned. So, until you acknowledge this, there's virtually no chance that the block will be lifted. El_C 00:39, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

I am sorry that my spirited conversation was reported as harassment. I certainly did not intend to. I am definitely against any form of harassment. I apologize for any unintentional discomfort I may have caused. But I am still more than willing to debate these articles in a civil and professional manner. Safi1919 (talk) 00:52, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Safi1919, how can I unblock someone who is unable to tell a spirited debate from harassment, and still don't understand what they did wrong, specifically? El_C 04:55, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Please explain to me which part of it was harassment specifically so that I can apologize for it specifically? That individual from get was threatening me that he will report me. I could have done the same, but I didn't. It was about content and nothing personal, but that individual made it personal. There absolutely no question about Iran's destructive behavior in the region. Are you as Wikipedia Administrator defending Iranian regime's religious and cultural terrorism in the the region? I seriously don't understand why a matter of historical content is turned into a personal harassment issue?

Please explain to me and I will apologize very specifically. Safi1919 (talk) 05:11, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Nope. Not going to do that. And the constant influx of very similar type of harassment that the victim has faced recently from multiple accounts (several of which I've blocked myself) is highly suspect. You are highly suspect. There is no way that I'm unblocking you, and I've also disabled talk page access for you. I guess I'm supposed to tell you that you can still appeal through WP:UTRS, but I doubt it'll go anywhere there, either. This campaign of harassment will be curtailed with great vigor, that you can be sure of. El_C 05:21, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a battleground on which to bring off-Wiki strife. Nor is it a venue for nationalist propaganda. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:49, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

UTRS 41140 declined

UTRS appeal #41140 has been declined.

Endorse block You have continued in this unblock request to indulge in the same conduct that led to your block. Rather than addressing your conduct, you have attempted to justify it while attacking the blocking admin and introducing off-Wiki politics. This unblock request is therefore declined. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:45, 8 March 2021 (UTC)