Jump to content

User talk:Safety-Hero

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello together, I would like to create articles for two products which have been pioneering in safe automation. Safety relay PNOZ and programmable control system PSS. I really need help. Creating non promotional articles is very difficult on my own. I would be very pleased, if you could help me.

Many thanks and kind regards.

Safety-Hero --217.110.67.35 (talk) 12:18, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Hey There Safety-Hero! I can help you form your articles in a non-biased form, but you might have to help me with the terms in turn. If you don't mind me not understanding everything, and possibly changing stuff myself instead of telling you a guideline(sometimes i forget. im not rude :) ) I would love to adopt you for your articles. :)

Libertarian=Truth? (talk) 22:07, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Libertarianrule! thank you very much for the adoption.;) Sorry, I was very busy this month ... but now I've planned some time to start to create this article. I know that the criterias for English wiki entries are very hard. So please, coould you help me to create a company's article in English. What will be the first steps? Thank you very much! Greetings Safety-Hero --217.110.67.35 (talk) 15:41, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:10, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sionk (talk) 00:10, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Hello Sionk, could you please review my page again. I filled in now several sources. Thank you!

User:Safety-Hero (talk) 15:00, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish someone to re-review your draft article you should re-submit it to Articles for Creation. However, in my view at the moment the article is not ready to be accepted. Ten of the sources are the company's own website. There is no evidence of any reliable, secondary news sources. Wikipedia's 'golden rule' makes it fairly clear what sort of sources we need to see. All the best! Sionk (talk) 18:26, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]

Sources are now insert. Please, review again. Thank you!

User:Safety-Hero 15:02, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Safety-Hero (talk) 17:17, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So I filled now in several reliable sources. Please, review again. Thank you!

Could you please review my article. Thank you!

Unfortunately I would not be prepared to accept the article in its current state. It is still largely sourced to the company website, an interview with the business development manager in a specialist publication, a press release etc. etc. You need to write the article based primarily on independent secondary sources and, preferably, show some evidence of general news/book coverage that talks significantly about the company. Many other of the sources you list do not explain what they are - you can find out wqhat sort of information we need to identify the sources, at Wikipedia:Citing_sources#What_information_to_include. All the best! Sionk (talk) 18:50, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Danish wiki

[edit]

I quess you are the user with the same name of danish wikipedia. Stop insert interwiki in articles. Use, wikidata with click on the rediger me-link in the bottom of the iw-links. If you insert more iw on the other way i will need to revert you edits. Kind regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.232.72.49 (talk) 19:43, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pilz (Company)

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pilz (Company), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Captain Conundrum (talk) 15:56, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pilz GmbH & Co. KG concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pilz GmbH & Co. KG, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 16:58, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pilz GmbH & Co. KG

[edit]

Hello Safety-Hero. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Pilz GmbH & Co. KG".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pilz GmbH & Co. KG}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 21:00, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Hi, The page has been revised and published. Thanks!

Nomination of Pilz (company) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pilz (company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pilz (company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Huon (talk) 14:03, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've found several third party sources concerning the company Pilz GmbH & Co. KG. It's a little bit difficlut so search because "Pilz" means also fungus in German . So I've found the following:

Google News: https://www.google.com/search?q=Pilz+GmbH%22&tbm=bks#q=%22Pilz+GmbH%22&tbm=nws

Google Books: https://www.google.com/search?q=Pilz+GmbH#q=Pilz+GmbH&tbm=bks

Could you please have a look on those sources. I'll add them afterwards. Thank you! Safety-Hero 12:57, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of PNOZ (safety relay) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PNOZ (safety relay) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PNOZ (safety relay) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Huon (talk) 14:12, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've found several third party sources concerning safety relays PNOZ. The following is available in www:

Google Scholar: http://scholar.google.de/scholar?hl=de&q=PNOZ+%22safety+relays%22&btnG=&lr=

Google Books: https://www.google.de/#q=pnoz+safety+relays&tbm=bks

Could you please have a look on those sources. I'll add them afterwards. Thank you! Safety-Hero 15:41, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


New sources added. Probably enough for the undeletion. Thank you! Safety-Hero 16:36, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for a tutor

[edit]

Dear all,

I'm looking for a tutor who helps me to write two English articles: one about safety relays and one about progammable safety controllers. Please, contact me. Thank you in advanced for your help.

Friendly Greetings Safety-Hero


Review of an article

[edit]

Hello Eduardofeld,

thank you for adopting me. Could you please review the article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Safety_relays. Thanks! Safety-Hero (talk) 16:15, 04 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Safety relay has been accepted

[edit]
Safety relay, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:42, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Safety-Hero&oldid=823181646"