User talk:Sadya goan
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Zohar, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! DemocraticLuntz (talk) 22:27, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
i hope i fixed it yes i am new
Bullae
[edit]Link doesn't work, and it really should be sourced from [1]. Doug Weller (talk) 17:03, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Dating the bible
[edit]Sadya, on the talk page of Dating the Bible you asked how scholars came to the dates they assign the books. That's a reasonable question and the article didn't answer it. I've tried to find answers, but I haven't been entirely successful. You can look at what I've done if you like, but you might e better off looking at the books I found, which are all listed in the bibliography. ANyway, just to repeat, I thought your request was perfectly reasonable. PiCo (talk) 23:28, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
October 2015
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to David, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Tgeorgescu (talk) 02:25, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Doug Weller. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:David that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.
You need to remove your attack. Doug Weller (talk) 18:21, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the apology. Doug Weller (talk) 09:58, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- But you didn't remove the attack. Doug Weller (talk) 13:55, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
3 Kinds of Prophecy in the Bible, Future of Science and Technology
[edit]There are only three kinds of prophecy in the the Bible.
Vacticinium ex eventu https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaticinium_ex_eventu
Prophecies about an immediate end of the world that did not come true: Jesus, Paul, and Revelation
Prophecies that are the product of theology in story form. No one can predict the future events.
Since it is more likely primitive pre-stone age and stone age people believed in magic before the idea of the supernatural was contemplated it is possible the later day belief in the supernatural is actually rooted in a belief of magic. Some atheists are convinced the faithful's attempt to remove anxiety caused by the mysterious unknown brought about the creation of supernatural beings. Some contend primitive people had no understanding of the many natural events (thunder and lightning, for example) and needed someone's works as an "explanation". The ancient Jews in Biblical times believed earth quakes were caused by Yahweh's foot steps and disease by demons. The ancient Romans thought angry storms at sea were the wrath of Neptune and Jupiter granted them supremacy. Andrew Lang in The Making of Religion suggested "As soon as man had the idea of "making" things, he might conjecture as to a Maker of things which he himself had not made, and could not make. He would regard this unknown Maker as a "magnified non-natural man."
My favorite and wisest quote from The Complete Life's Instruction Book by H. Jackson Brown Jr. "Never deprive someone of hope; it might be all they have."
What can we expect from the advances in science and technology in the future? Introducing: Michio Kaku https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michio_Kaku
Miistermagico (talk) 07:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)