User talk:Sadondakis/sandbox
Sam's Peer Review
[edit]Perhaps explain further the importance of the Hartwell papers in the lead. The sentence of the 14 contributing authors could be placed in a secondary paragraph to allow for more important information in the lead section. Perhaps the third paragraph has relevant information that can be placed in the lead.
"The Hartwell Paper recommends achieving this goal by introducing low carbon taxes" --an elaboration of how this can be made possible?
Michelleg0296 (talk) 09:51, 21 November 2017 (UTC)Michelle Gonzalez
Peter's Peer Review
[edit]Sam, this was a nicely summarized overview. I only have one critique with the Problems Section: it seems like it had opinionated facts without the actual evidence to back up the claims. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hyungseoklee (talk • contribs) 14:28, 22 November 2017 (UTC)