User talk:Sachamcd

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeremy Searle (November 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

I need an explanation as to why, major news wesbsites in Montreal are not eligible sources. Also why his colleagues (Marvin Rotrand, Lionel Perez, Russell Copeman) can be considered notable enough, but he cannot, even though he has been in politics for longer then those mentioned above. Sachamcd (talk) 15:52, 2 December 2015 (UTC)Sacmcd[reply]

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jeremy Searle and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 21:10, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeremy Searle (December 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jeremy Searle and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 16:21, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gale P. Elston for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gale P. Elston is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gale P. Elston until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 23:16, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your participation in WP:AfD discussions might be enhanced by familiarizing yourself with the Wikipedia:Notability guidelines, the Wikipedia:Guide to deletion, Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions and Wikipedia:Arguments to make in deletion discussions. --Bejnar (talk) 07:06, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Bejnar, however I have already familiarized myself with the notability page. Gale P. Elston is extremely well-known in the international art scene. Her clients include very notable and famous artists like Willem De Kooning and Andy Warhol, not “C-list celebrities” as Velella put it. Please consider the legitimacy of this article in context of the international art world. Sachamcd (talk) 17:53, 19 December 2015 (UTC)Sachamcd[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeremy Searle (December 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CatcherStorm was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jeremy Searle and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CatcherStorm ^talk 12:51, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Sachamcd, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CatcherStorm ^talk 12:51, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Jeremy Searle with this edit, without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:11, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit War re:Jeremy Searle page

I am in the process of making an edit warring report in regards to the Jeremy Searle page which you have removed the "Jewish Guilt Comments" section from even after the RfC on talk page reached a consensus to include.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. | MK17b | (talk) 04:38, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sachamcd, you are risking a block per this complaint. You are trying to undo the result of a formal WP:Request for comment, in other words you are warring against consensus. There may still be time for you to concede the point if you want to avoid a block. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 05:14, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am removing material that in MAY 2016 was deemed completely irrelevant to the breadth of his political career and comments which were already disproven in the Canadian Jewish media. ^[1] MK17b has a history of editing jewish propaganda into a host of pages on wikipedia, look at his edit history and this will be evident. I suspect he might be operating under the Jewish Internet Defence force and it is he who should be banned for perpetuating his bias and obvious agenda. I am reenlisting the help of admin Oshwah who back in May 2016 helped reverse some edits made by MK17b. MK17b is trying to ban me because he knows this is the only way for him to get his libel to stick. Please help. Sachamcd (talk) 13:45, 6 September 2016 (UTC)Sachamcd[reply]

References

^ http://www.cjnews.com/news/canada/councillor-apologizes-to-jewish-community-but-not-chabad

Sachamcd - your accusations toward MK17b are completely unwarranted and absolutely unacceptable per Wikipedia's civility guidelines. Not only have you been engaged in previous edit wars with this user in the recent past, but it appears that you exhibit battleground conduct towards those you disagree with. This behavior needs to stop, dude. Even in your message on my talk page, you state how "the jewish community often adds defamatory information" to articles you edit. Sure, the content I reviewed had questionable sources, and I agreed it should be removed and discussed - that did not mean that you should edit war and ignore others' requests to talk about it. You need to take some time and re-evaluate your behavior and your actions. This pattern of collaboration usually results in community sanctions when editors continue doing so despite being asked to stop. Please think about it, okay? ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:41, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Jeremy Searle

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at the noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 13:59, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jeremy Searle

Hello, Sachamcd. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Jeremy Searle".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:16, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://www.cjnews.com/news/canada/councillor-apologizes-to-jewish-community-but-not-chabad

[1]