User talk:Sabuhi from Baku

Welcome!

Hello, Asparux Xan Bulqar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for List of countries by Kurdish-speaking population. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Muhandes (talk) 13:31, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

HAHK

Read this link that shows the release date. And 18.7.1994 may have been the date it was censored by the CBFC. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:17, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of architects of Baku

Can you keep check of the article List of architects of Baku due to POV reasons. This article has been hijacked and edited almost exclusively as an article of Armenian architects of Baku, even though the article according to its title is not intended as such.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.66.211.209 (talk) 16:20, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sabuhi from Baku. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Hello.

The List of People's Artists of Azerbaijan is incomplete. Could you add the people missing in the list, from the complete Azerbaijani az:Azərbaycan SSR xalq artistlərinin siyahısı and Russian ru:Список народных артистов Азербайджанской ССР versions?

Thank you.

31.200.18.11 (talk) 09:42, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Yarsanism

An article that you have been involved in editing—Yarsanism —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. MiguelMadeira (talk) 23:07, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--MiguelMadeira (talk) 23:07, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Sabuhi from Baku. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quick apology

Sorry about this, it looked like a random unaffiliated page at first and I didn't spot the "download" link. Thanks for pointing that out in your revert. Normally the archive.org link is provided when there's an actual copy available there too, but that wasn't even the case here, so I was wrong either way! R Prazeres (talk) 16:49, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations in external links

Hello Sabuhi from Baku! Looking at your contributions it appears that you have added external links to books available for download on https://www.avetruthbooks.com. It seems to me that this website does not respect the copyrights of the books it provides downloads for. If this is correct, the links you have added are contrary to Wikipedia policy (please see WP:COPYVIOEL), and I would like to ask you to self-revert your edits in which you have added such external links. Thanks, ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 22:34, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your opinion is double standards in relation to a certain site. Why is there no such requirement, for example, for archive.org or for academia.edu? Like those two, this site has books printed from the 15th century to the present year. The site is primarily a catalog and not an electronic library. Moreover, a lot of books on this site are not on the site, but on the archive.org. Sabuhi from Baku (talk) 11:43, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Avetruthbooks

Sorry, but I'm going to revert all your additions regarding that site. Wikipedia is not going to advertise for a site that delves in pseudo-history and genocide denial. See also WP:CONSENSUS and WP:ONUS. HistoryofIran (talk) 12:21, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Take another look at the link: there is a book linked to which it is attached here on the wiki. If you are reading a book (that is, a source) of pseudoscience, then prove that it propagates pseudohistory and you can delete (delete the book itself and not just the download link). I don't think you care about the site, the problem for you is that the article is being edited by someone from Azerbaijan. At the same time, I only added a link and did not fix anything in the text of the article. You personally have a very strong intolerance towards Azerbaijanis. There are hundreds of thousands of books and articles on that site (most of which are physically located on archive.org): your empty accusations are only an expression of your feelings, personal hostility. This site does not promote anything but gives access to documents and publications in various languages.Sabuhi from Baku (talk) 12:43, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did the Armenian genocide happen, yes or no? I would also advise you to refrain from making accusations towards me, you are certainly in no position based on this. HistoryofIran (talk) 12:46, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are not a judge, and this is not a court. You can ask, it's your right, but I won't answer because it's my right. You push off the topic: we are not discussing the Armenian genocide. You remove the link on which the book is located because you do not like that the site administrators have their own opinion, although they do not write articles but only provide sources in electronic form. Wikipedia is not the place to express your hatred towards other people or nations.Sabuhi from Baku (talk) 12:53, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, thats all I needed to know. I’ll report you when I get home. HistoryofIran (talk) 12:55, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You were the first to blame the site, including me, despite this you reproach me: saying that you do not like the tags that are used in this site. So the tags on the site are added so that the reader knows in advance what topic this work is written on, and nothing more.Sabuhi from Baku (talk) 13:00, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notification

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is External links: concerns over copyrights and genocide denial. Thank you. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 14:28, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't pose the question correctly. Another user simply did not like the tags on the site, he himself has intolerance, perhaps even hatred towards Azerbaijan. I explained what the tags mean and that's it. As for copyright: the problem is big if you take not only this site, but all external links. If you are a supporter of rules + fair equality, then and other sites should have emphasized and not just this.Sabuhi from Baku (talk) 14:52, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just see please: my link has been removed and a link from zlib has been put in its place. And you're talking about copyright. It can be seen that the matter is not in copyright: but in something else. I wrote the reason above. Sabuhi from Baku (talk) 15:38, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've but the Google books link back, I doubt either of these links zlib or avetruthbooks should be added.
To clear up one issue archive.org is a lending library, which is an exemption from copyright as they own the books they are lending. Academia.edu works differenty, it's quite usual for academic authors to retain copyrights for their works. So although they can't post a whole journal or book, they can republished the article or chapter they wrote. Separately google books pays for the right to show previews of works. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 16:32, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In archive.org and academia.edu, these rules work very superficially: both sites have millions of books with open access copyright, although if there were a strict rule, this would not be. Only 267,000 books from archive.org have been withdrawn from the public full view, and the academy generally does not pay attention to what authors / users publish. And from these sites there are many hundreds of thousands of links in the wiki. Sabuhi from Baku (talk) 17:20, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice: You are now subject to a topic ban from Armenia and Azerbaijan

Following this discussion at ANI, you are topic-banned from editing content related to Armenia or Azerbaijan, broadly construed. As a community-ban, this sanction may be appealed to the community at the Administrators' noticeboard _signed,Rosguill ^talk 04:15, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]