User talk:SWED Donald Clinton

Speedy deletion nomination of Schmidding SG34

Hello SWED Donald Clinton,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Schmidding SG34 for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, Schmidding SG 34.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 03:33, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Stub wing

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Stub wing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -Primetime (talk) 04:07, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Fieseler Fi 333, did not appear constructive and has been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Don't fill inthe infobox with "none" "?", "NA" etc. Just leave them blank. Don't keep doing this. It doesn't contribute anything useful to the article. It was a prototype that never went into production. Period. Meters (talk) 04:40, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stub wing ‎

Don't remove the speedy deletion request from articles you have created. If you want to argue against the deletion request follow the instructions and make your case on the talk page. Furthermore, talk pages are for discussing the article. They are not for taking credit for edits and the other uses you suggested. See WP:TALK. I have removed your material from the talk page.

I suggest that you read WP:YFA before attempting ot create any more articles. Meters (talk) 04:46, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Stub wing

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Stub wing. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Fin#Controlling_motion. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Fin#Controlling_motion – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Meters (talk) 04:57, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a more applicable criterion than the previous one. Meters (talk) 04:57, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Please stop adding the redundant filler information in infoboxes. The Long March 11 has had one launch, and one success. We can count to one. We don't need to fill in the infobox to say that it has had no failures, no partial failures, and no other outcomes. My previous comment about these types of infobox edits was meant to apply to all infoboxes, not just that particular article. Meters (talk) 16:56, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]