Jump to content

User talk:STP43FAN

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, STP43FAN, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Royalbroil 23:47, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, STP43FAN. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, STP43FAN. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, STP43FAN. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request for clarification

[edit]

Greetings and felicitations. In the article "Cylon Basestar" in this edit you made a change that needs a bit of clarification, as it does not quite make sense. Would you please be so kind as to clean up the added sentence? —DocWatson42 (talk) 06:53, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cylon Basestar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tier (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:24, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Harry O, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Olson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:39, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Thunderbirds episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alias (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:43, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bills–Patriots rivalry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jamie Collins (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:42, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Yours Truly, Johnny Dollar episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Stephenson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1996 Dallas Cowboys season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aaron Bailey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Coke Zero Sugar 400, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Martin Truex.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited YellaWood 500, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Byron.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:59, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1994 Dallas Cowboys season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jimmy Johnson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:37, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Tennessee Titans season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Desmond King.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2003 Baltimore Ravens season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anthony Wright.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:44, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1998 Tennessee Oilers season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Jamie Martin and James McKnight.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited DiGard Motorsports, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Yates.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Typecasting

[edit]

Hi. Regarding your addition to the Typecasting article, what is the source for that information? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 01:47, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Viewing the episode cited in text STP43FAN (talk) 02:24, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean viewing the episode? Can you clarify? Nightscream (talk) 17:22, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I viewed the television episode cited in the section on typecasting and Gordon Jump. It is from the series HARRY O and the episode is Anatomy Of A Frame. In the episode Gordon Jump plays against type, here as a drug kingpin. STP43FAN (talk) 17:11, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We need secondary sources for analytical or evaluative information, like whether a role constitutes typecasting or playing against type. Citing the primary source of the episode itself means you're making the observation yourself, which violates WP:NOR, in particular WP:SYNTH. Nightscream (talk) 14:44, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wow!

[edit]

Thank you so much for bringing this to my attention via this edit. It feels so good knowing that they are finally going to release the unreleased Kirshner material from January and February 1967. I just wish that Micky Dolenz would add his vocals to 'I Wanna Be Your Puppy Dog', 'Love is on the Way', 'Sugar Man', 'Poor Little Me', 'Black and Blue', 'Eve of My Sorrow', and 'The Love You Got Inside'.

But if that never happens, then at least we'll get to hear those tracks in instrumental form. I've already made my own concept of what could have been released as the Monkees' third album instead of Headquarters. ― C.Syde (talk | contribs) 01:59, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. What’s frustrating about that whole melodrama between The Monkees and Kirshner is it was completely unnecessary. They could have easily worked together (Kirshner in particular). STP43FAN (talk) 16:00, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Kirshner was definitely fired at the right time. As Headquarters is definitely a better album than the one that Kirshner had planned for them. I feel that for two albums at least, The Monkees made better music independently than they had under Kirshner's control.
Then once they started recording most of their music as solo artists, the quality of their average music just slipped over. And paled in comparison to the music that had been released on their first four albums. Though they still had some great songs here and there, the number of great songs decreased while the number of average songs increased. While I agree that Kirshner was fired at the right time, it would have been nice to hear what the album Kirshner planned for them would have sounded like, had it been completed.
Hopefully now that the backing track for 'Sugar Man' has been released, people will finally realise that it was the song that Michael Nesmith had declined to record and not 'Sugar, Sugar' as widely believed. ― C.Syde (talk | contribs) 02:27, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

TarnishedPathtalk 02:04, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please note especially that Andy Ngo has active arbitration remedies:
  • You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on this article (except in limited circumstances)
  • Changes challenged by reversion may not be reinstated without affirmative consensus on the talk page
See the notice at the talk page for further info. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:58, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You just violated the "Changes challenged by reversion ..." restriction. Please be more careful. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:59, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Violation of Active Arbitration remedies

[edit]

Please note that the edit you performed at Special:Diff/1214857964 was a violation of Active Arbitration remedies on Andy Ngo. You've been given warnings about Contentious Topics and Active Arbitration remedies at Special:Diff/1197819932 and Special:Diff/1197973649. Perform any similar edit/s again and I will fill a report on you at WP:AE. TarnishedPathtalk 01:59, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

TarnishedPathtalk 05:14, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The “consensus” edits are factually inaccurate, made in bad faith, and are projectionist instead of engaging with points made by Mr. Ngo He is not a social media influencer and has repeatedly and successfully rebutted accusations made against him. “Right wing” is projectionist implying ideological motives that only exist in progressive ideologies STP43FAN (talk) 01:43, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your opinion, however the contents of the section that you disagree with are the result of consensus and reliable sources. You're quite welcome to engage in discussion on the talk page if you disagree and think you have reliable sources that might sway consensus. However if you continue to revert the section of material against consensus you will find yourself the subject of an WP:AE filing. TarnishedPathtalk 10:38, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No those you’re citing are not reliable or accurate sources STP43FAN (talk) 15:51, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
STP43FAN, you will also fail and get in trouble, likely blocked, if you continue to attack other editors and assume bad faith. Your "projectionist" comment is especially ironic. Look in the mirror. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 17:17, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Don’t lecture me for telling the truth about projectionism by yourself STP43FAN (talk) 15:52, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:STP43FAN&oldid=1218751221"