User talk:SRKFan1965

Hi, I'm SRKFan1965. I'm a huge fan of Shah Rukh Khan. I'm quite new to Wikipedia. My first big article is Don 3. It's still under review. I like Vijay and Rajnikanth as well! Huge Hindi and Tamil movie enthusiast!!

September 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of most expensive Indian films have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of most expensive Indian films was changed by SRKFan1965 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.865766 on 2023-09-09T14:55:31+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:55, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you do that? Jawan's final budget has come out to be 300 crore. why did u change it? SRKFan1965 (talk) 15:04, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Don 3, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Felida⁹⁷ (talk) 16:28, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jeraxmoira. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Vinayakan, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Jeraxmoira (talk) 17:12, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jeraxmoira. I did cite his birth date to a source. Please check my edition of the page. If it's not reliable, please reply to this message. SRKFan1965 (talk) 13:15, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The source that you cited is unreliable and cannot be used on Wikipedia. Jeraxmoira (talk) 15:29, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Don 3 (October 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ratnahastin was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Don't cite user generated content site such as youtube.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Don 3 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ratnahastin (talk) 13:33, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find any other reference for the article I wrote. What should I do? SRKFan1965 (talk) 13:41, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SRKFan1965! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ratnahastin (talk) 13:33, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Don 3 (October 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Phuzion was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Twitter and letterboxd are not acceptable sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Don 3 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Phuzion (talk) 17:20, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Don 3 (October 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Don (franchise). Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don 3. That was ten years ago, but this is still an unreleased film.

This draft or article is about an unreleased film. The film notability guideline identifies three stages in the production cycle for films:

1. Planned films that have not begun production (principal photography or animation). These planned films do not satisfy film notability.
2. Films that are confirmed by reliable sources to have begun production, but have not been released. These films are only notable if production itself satisfies general notability in terms of significant coverage. Mere mention of the start of production does not satisfy notability.
3. Films that have been released, whose notability is determined by reception and reviews, or a major notable award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking.

This film page must be evaluated based on general notability of production.

It appears that production has still not yet begun.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Don 3 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 07:26, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]