User talk:SK Ninix Next Next Generation Flash Memory

September 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to League of Legends has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: League of Legends was changed by SK Ninix Next Next Generation Flash Memory (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950052 on 2018-09-23T02:48:27+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:48, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. INeedSupport^{(Care free to give me support?)} 02:49, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

revive me...

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SK Ninix Next Next Generation Flash Memory (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not sockpuppet of My Royal Young (MRY), and pls revive me my account... - SK Ninix Next Next Generation Flash Memory (talk) 02:51, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You outright said you were a sockpuppet on your user page. At best, you're WP:NOTHERE. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 03:00, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Oshwah, Widr, Zzuuzz, K6ka, Drmies, Xeno, and Xaosflux: revive pls... - SK Ninix Next Next Generation Flash Memory (talk) 02:51, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@DoRD, Courcelles, Berean Hunter, Bbb23, BU Rob13, DeltaQuad, and Ks0stm: checkusers, revive pls... - SK Ninix Next Next Generation Flash Memory (talk) 02:59, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) I'm not a checkuser so I can not comment on the sockpupptry, but I am an experienced editor and one thing you are is a vandal, and we block for that also. - FlightTime (open channel) 03:03, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SK Ninix Next Next Generation Flash Memory (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@BU Rob13: I repeat you, this a not sockpuppet and long term abuser of My Royal Young (MRY), and give in one more chance pls? - SK Ninix Next Next Generation Flash Memory (talk) 03:06, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Decline confirmed sock, revoke tpa.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

— Berean Hunter (talk) 05:34, 23 September 2018 (UTC)}}[reply]

Then why did you say you were on your user page? ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:21, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

— Berean Hunter (talk) 05:35, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]