User talk:SJSchiffer

Concern regarding Draft:Troy Guard

Hello, SJSchiffer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Troy Guard, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Troy Guard (September 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eviolite were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Troy Guard and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

eviolite (talk) 23:24, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SJSchiffer! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! eviolite (talk) 23:24, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Hello SJSchiffer. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:SJSchiffer. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=SJSchiffer|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. eviolite (talk) 02:38, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have disclosed my COI on the Troy Guard page as required. Lon Symensma is also a client, and I will happily disclose that fact--however, I don't have anything to do with, nor have I ever, his page. I did not create or otherwise edit it in any way. I'm unclear as the rules as to why i'd have to disclose that if I have nothing to do with that page, nor being compensated in any way with regard to his wikipedia profile. Thanks in advance for your explanation. SJSchiffer (talk) 02:54, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A client of what? Does your employer write Wikipedia drafts for multiple clients? Again, you need to declare both your employer and client, not just your client. eviolite (talk) 03:36, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am own a public relations firm and am self-employed. SJSchiffer (talk) 04:18, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think I have all of the disclosures correct. Please let me know. SJSchiffer (talk) 04:29, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the clarification, seems good now. eviolite (talk) 13:03, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Troy Guard (November 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

awards are for the restaurants not him?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Troy Guard and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:53, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Troy Guard has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Troy Guard. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 18:13, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Regarding the interview comment, the sources are legit publications/editorial (editor and chief, they fact check), and the introductions ahead of the interview portion supports factual claims in the piece. How do I reconcile? SJSchiffer (talk) 19:21, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Troy Guard (January 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources are largely interviews or based on what he says so not independent. Other sources are standard announcements about openings and the like, which are not useful for notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Troy Guard and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 15:10, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Troy Guard

Hello, SJSchiffer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Troy Guard".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:08, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]