User talk:SG5536B/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions about User:SG5536B. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia, ST7733B! Thank you for your contributions. This is an encyclopedia, so remember that it's a necessity to include references listing reliable websites, newspapers, articles, books and other sources you have used to write or expand articles. Please understand that these sources should verify the information in a fair and accurate manner. However, you must not copy and paste text you find anywhere, except for short quotations, marked as such with quote marks and carefully cited to the source the quote was taken from. New articles and statements added to existing articles may be deleted by others if unreferenced or referenced poorly or if they are copyright violations. See referencing for beginners for more details.

I am Nyamo Kurosawa and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page.

Here are some more pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Nyamo Kurosawa (talk) 10:02, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for the welcome! ST7733B (talk) 11:40, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi, ive seen that you changed my lyrics on baa baa black sheep, its proven to be the original lyrics based on the wool trade from British, during the medieval times. I would like it changed back for this false information could mislead thousands of people. 103.180.1.222 (talk) 08:04, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

I see. Guess you are right. I will go restore your version. ST7733B (talk) 08:12, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

It's not what the cited source says, though. You were right in your orginal revert. MichaelMaggs (talk) 13:16, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for pointing that out @MichaelMaggs. Have a nice day. (Apologies for the slightly late reply) ST7733B (talk) 02:51, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

December 2023

Hello, and thank you for removing vandalism from Port Moresby. We appreciate this, but unfortunately your edit was not successful in restoring the article to its pre-vandalised state. For future reference, it is better to deal with vandalism by checking the article's page history to determine how it appeared before it was vandalised. You can then restore the whole article, or the relevant part of it, to an appropriate earlier version. If you simply delete the visible vandalism then any content removed or overwritten by the vandal is lost. See How to deal with vandalism for details. Thank you. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 08:37, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi Sumanuil, thank you for pointing this out. I will take note of this. ST7733B (talk) 08:40, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:CRRC Qingdao Sifang CR151 has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:CRRC Qingdao Sifang CR151. Thanks! Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 21:41, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: CRRC Qingdao Sifang CR151 has been accepted

CRRC Qingdao Sifang CR151, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 00:05, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Your comments on Sgnpkd's unblock request

Your experience ostensibly includes 830 edits in 3 months. Based on your activities, I'm assuming this is not your first account. In any case, you comments at User talk:Sgnpkd#Blocked as a sockpuppet really weren't helpful. Please leave that stuff to people who know what they're doing. Thanks. RoySmith (talk) 16:50, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi RoySmith, my apologies for any inconvenience I caused. I promise to leave ~~that part~~ commenting on others talk pages in off for some time and the decision ultamitely up to the admins. I will mainly concentrate on updating latest information in public transport articles and perhaps fix some WP:MOS errors in them as well instead. SG5536B (my talk page | my contribs) 23:05, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Also, this is actually my first account. But why did I make 830 edits in 3 months? When I was first not editing on Wikipedia yet, I have been looking up to how the good editors make changes to Wikipedia articles. Soon, I picked up the skills from them quickly as well as the basics and some functions such as Twinkle. Gaming the system or causing disruption was never my intention; I just wanted my contributions to Wikipedia as useful as possible. Nevertheless, I apologise for any of my edits that make you concerned. Thank you for reading. SG5536B (my talk page | my contribs) 00:00, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit

—Femke 🐦 (talk) 15:17, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

May 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at User talk:Picard's Facepalm, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Picard's Facepalm • ^{Made It So} _Engage! • 13:17, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Picard's Facepalm, thank you for your input and feedback here. I was reverting an edit to your talk page performed by a probable sock puppet of User:AirbusA350500 as pointed out by another user. I thought I was not doing it wrong per WP:REVERTBAN. Okay, I understand where this can get concerning, but when I read through WP:TPO thoroughly, I discovered that one of the examples of appropriately editing others' comments was "Removing or striking through comments made by blocked sock puppets of users editing in violation of a block or ban." Nevertheless, I realize and accept I should have provided a more accurate edit summary with my revert to minimize confusion. Thank you for reading. ~ SG5536B (talk) 15:28, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Capitalization of Japanese station names

Hi there, please stop moving Japanese train stations names to the weird capitalizations used by the railway companies. Current consensus is that we use English conventions and the letter after a hyphen is capitalized, see lengthy discussion at Talk:Sōtetsu Shin-Yokohama Line. Jpatokal (talk) 09:52, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Jpatokal, thank you for your point. I made several changes to station and line articles based on what the latest and official station signs show (such as this image). Note that the page "Imba Nihon-idai Station" was moved from "Imba-Nihon-Idai Station" in December 2022 (which is more than one-and-a-half years ago) taking into account the station name written on the railway operator's website. Also, I was unaware of the discussion at Talk:Sōtetsu Shin-Yokohama Line before you raised it to me, but now I have read it. Okay, I understand your view in how changing the title from "Shin-Yokohama Station" to "Shin-yokohama Station" seems awkward. However, for some other station articles including Kyoto-kawaramachi Station and Ishibashi handai-mae Station, I'm not really sure if the letter after the hyphen should be uppercase or should be left as it is. What is your take on this? If you think the capitalization in the title of the station article on Wikipedia I mentioned earlier in my comment should be slightly altered to what you think it should be, I will be willing to accept it. Thanks for reading. ~ SG5536B (talk) 13:35, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Nankai 7100 series

Hello, SG5536B. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nankai 7100 series, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hankyu 5100 series has been accepted

Hankyu 5100 series, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 21:39, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Liamb2011

Thanks for your quick and clear response to my request. Much appreciated.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:05, 7 August 2024 (UTC)