User talk:SCPSLBFCPCFB

April 2022

Hello, SCPSLBFCPCFB, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as CdeVNdeP (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 20:36, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making abusive or otherwise inappropriate edit summaries, as you did to Sex differences in psychology. Your edit summary may have been removed. Please look at pages regarding Civility and Personal attacks in your spare time. Thank you, SCPSLBFCPCFB. Minkai (boop that talk button!-contribs-ANI Hall of Fame) 20:37, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SCPSLBFCPCFB. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 04:53, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SCPSLBFCPCFB (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Although my initial use of multiple accounts did not have any intention of block evasion, my posterior edits corresponded, at least in part, to block evasion. I should have tried to be unblocked, but I have followed the easiest and fastest path of using IPs, wich got me blocked for sockpuppetry. I appologise, I am responsible, I assume my mistake, and I will not do it again. I will not give other editors the same troubles I did before. I was accused of not being here to build an encyclopedia, but, if unblocked, I will not follow those very same negative patterns, such as edit warring. Anything I must do to be unblocked, I will do it. Thank you. SCPSLBFCPCFB (talk) 12:02, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You've worked hard to demonstrate you haven't the slightest intention of abiding by WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE. You can change our minds by going at least six months with zero edits, then applying under WP:SO. At that point, you'll likely need to propose a WP:TOPICBAN in the subject area giving you so much trouble these past few months, given that you have demonstrated you are not capable of editing appropriately there. Yamla (talk) 12:09, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.