User talk:SCAH
Welcome
[edit]
|
March 2019
[edit]
Your recent editing history at List of United States presidential vetoes shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jasper Deng (talk) 17:57, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm CataracticPlanets. I noticed that you recently removed content from Whitewashing in film without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CataracticPlanets (talk) 00:09, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
1RR violation at Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections
[edit]This is a 1RR violation [1], please self revert. Here is an explanatory link WP:1RR. Geogene (talk) 19:25, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
March 2019
[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
- MrX 🖋 19:26, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
It may not have been your intention, but one of your edits, specifically one that you made on List of United States presidential assassination attempts and plots, may have removed material that some consider relevant to the article. Due to this, your edits may have been reverted. When removing large portions of material, it is good practice to first discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them, to gain consensus over whether or not the text, phrasing, etc. is deserving of deletion. If you believe that the information you removed was correct, please initiate that discussion. Thank you. SKay (talk) 07:21, 29 March 2019 (UTC)