User talk:SAINFIELDCASTRO
June 2021
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Oyigbo, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 18:10, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Oyigbo. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:05, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Ikwerre, Rivers, you may be blocked from editing. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:11, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:51, 21 June 2021 (UTC)January 2022
[edit] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Opobo. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 10:28, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Opobo shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 10:29, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
January 2023
[edit] Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kingdom of Bonny, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 21:42, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cross River State. - Arjayay (talk) 21:43, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf(talk) 12:59, 24 January 2023 (UTC)