User talk:SAE1962

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:SAE1962.

Welcome!

Hello, SAE1962, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! - CobaltBlueTony 16:24, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fuzzy control

Instead of blanking this page, consider putting up a redirect, or listing the article for deletion. Triona 16:26, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

- Thanks for your help! I am new here, so I need your corrections & tips.

SAE1962 12:46, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fuzzy control

If you find you have added a duplicate article, you can use a redirect or request a speedy deletion. I have redirected Fuzzy control to Fuzzy logic per your comment on the page. -- JLaTondre 16:29, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like two of us entered the same comment at the same time. Wasn't inttentionally trying to browbeat you with duplicate comments... -- JLaTondre 16:30, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Brainlobes_labeled.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Brainlobes_labeled.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. --OrphanBot 06:18, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:680px-Brain lateral view.png

Thanks for uploading Image:680px-Brain lateral view.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:07, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Notes

Hi, SAE1962, I've noticed you have been editing a bunch of China-related articles lately, which is great. Just a few notes for future reference. First, individual years shouldn't be linked to articles per the MOS. In fact, bots or users with automated scripts will often run through an article and remove every linked year, so don't waste your time doing this. Second, yesterday you made a large edit to the Confucianism article which had several problems. First, good work adding the language templates, but the pinyin shouldn't be in italics. Also, you used the {{fact}} template incorrectly, this should only be used when you want a citation to be added, the text in the note won't actually be visible on the page. Finally, you got the Chinese wrong in the first sentence! 学 is actually a different character than 家, not the simplified version. When I saw this I immediately reverted your entire edit, but I will go back now and partially revert back to it, since it was mostly correct. Anyway, keep up the good work, and don't hesitate to ask if you have any questions. shoeofdeath (talk) 20:24, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of "East Asia Economic Group"

I have nominated "East Asia Economic Group" (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Floaterfluss ^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:34, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of CloudGarden

A tag has been placed on CloudGarden requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JohnCD (talk) 11:22, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jigloo GUI Builder

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Jigloo GUI Builder, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Jigloo GUI Builder. KurtRaschke (talk) 02:01, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In fact this is a matter of notability. You may have a look at the (defunct) guideline for software notability. -- lucasbfr ^talk 14:54, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Zh-tspla

A tag has been placed on Template:Zh-tspla requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 20:49, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:ZhTable-cpw

A tag has been placed on Template:ZhTable-cpw requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 20:49, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's correct! I translated the template for future use, but obviously was diverted to other subjects.

SAE1962 (talk) 13:51, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OpenJIT

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of OpenJIT, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.freshports.org/java/openjit. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:12, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spam in Integrated Multi Channel

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Integrated Multi Channel, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Integrated Multi Channel is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Integrated Multi Channel, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 13:50, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Style edits

The edits you recently made to Library of Congress are contrary to Wikipedia:MOS#Punctuation and inline citations. Please review the style guidelines before making similar edits to other articles. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 13:32, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, as I was thinking that my changes are a standard I know from some printed documents. SAE1962 (talk) 13:47, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

e.g. and i.e.

Hi there. I noticed at the Scrum (development) article that you changed e.g. to e. g. and i.e. to i. e. This is incorrect; there should be no spacing between those abbreviations. Cheers, Van der Hoorn (talk) 08:25, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dark Doodad Nebula

Please don't copy text verbatim from various sources. Aside from being inappropriately written for being encyclopedic content, I can't find anything at APOD that says that the text is public domain, so, it appears to be a copyright violation. 76.66.196.139 (talk) 13:36, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is a page of NASA, and NASA is a state organisation. That's why I used the text there. For the picture, I got the answer of the photograph that he would be pleased when the picture would appear in Wikipedia. However, due to my error, couldn't find out how to send it to Wikimedia Commons. SAE1962 (talk) 19:14, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Deep-sky objects

Hi,

We would appreciate it if you would please not use the category you created, "Deep-sky objects". The reason is that virtually every object outside the Solar System is a deep-sky object, and we already have a well-developed category tree under Category:Astronomical objects that covers all such features. Thank you.—RJH (talk) 18:52, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Layer 1 switch listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Layer 1 switch. Since you had some involvement with the Layer 1 switch redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). SnottyWong talk 16:51, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of GhostDoc

The article GhostDoc has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Visual Studio plugin with no assertion of notability or citations of reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zachlipton (talk) 08:53, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You recent change to Microsoft Silverlight is undone

Hello, SAW1962. I reverted your recent changes to Microsoft Silverlight since it was nonconstructive and violated two guidelines. First, Adobe Flash and Java FX are already in the navbox; there is no need for a See Also section. Second, please read Manual of Style: Layout. Fleet Command (talk) 16:32, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, SAE1962. You have new messages at Talk:Main Page#Main page: Where to ask?.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Highspeedrailguy (talk) 19:48, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of email addresses on Schemelessness

I noticed in this edit] to [[Schemelessness] that you added what might be construed as non-public personal information, specifically individual people's email addresses. Please remember that adding non-public personal information to an article is not allowed. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:19, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Schemelessness

The article Schemelessness has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication how this has independent notability; only source is a blog

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 21:57, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Location

According to the documentation for {{cite web}}, the location= parameter is for the geographical place of publication. There is absolutely no need to repeat the site URL. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:05, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You wrote in the article Column family (now Standard column family) the following comment:

RHaworth(talk | contribs) (7,038 bytes) (I repeat: I don't see the point of location in cite web templates

I use the cite web template to cite information found on the Web. Is this wrong? How am I supposed to cite information found on the Web? Please give me a link where I can find the correct template for this usage. Sae1962 (talk) 12:22, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For goodness sake, please actually read what I have written and follow any links. I gave you a link to this edit. Today I did this edit. Now, do those edits suggest that you should not be using {{cite web}}? Of course not. I am merely saying that when you use {{cite web}}, you do not need to provide a location= parameter. Surely that was clear the first time I mentioned the matter? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:33, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Aquiles

Category:Aquiles, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 22:50, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of XMA (software) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article XMA (software) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XMA (software) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 18:40, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of OpenXMA for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article OpenXMA is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpenXMA until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 15:19, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of SWTBot

The article SWTBot has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I can't find any third-party WP:RSes for the subject. Most references are to user forums discussing it. I would expect that notable coverage would be present in such cases.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:41, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of SWTBot for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SWTBot is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SWTBot until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:22, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tim Axelrod

The article Tim Axelrod has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NACADEMIC.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 11:15, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Lang-ar-at

Template:Lang-ar-at has been nominated for merging with Template:Lang-ar. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PanchoS (talk) 21:12, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Message consumer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Message consumer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Message consumer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SITH (talk) 19:20, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]