User talk:S11141827

S11141827, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi S11141827! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced information

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of concertos by Johann Sebastian Bach, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --Francis Schonken (talk) 14:31, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at List of concertos by Johann Sebastian Bach, you may be blocked from editing. --Francis Schonken (talk) 14:35, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of concertos by Johann Sebastian Bach. --Francis Schonken (talk) 14:38, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is not enough if you just say that the block was "wrong" or "unfair", or another user violated a policy first. You must explain why it was wrong to block me or why it should be reversed. This is based on updated information.

Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you.—J. M. (talk) 23:41, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi S11141827! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing!

Looks like nobody welcomed you here, - sorry about that. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:25, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. —J. M. (talk) 20:35, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop marking major edits as minor

Hi S11141827! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. —J. M. (talk) 20:42, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. English does not use capital letters for common nouns. It's "piano", "bass", "oboe", "melody" etc., not "Piano", "Bass", "Oboe", "Melody" etc. Also, please do not use "&" instead of "and". See MOS:AMP. But most importantly, stop ignoring all warnings on your talk page, otherwise you will be blocked from editing. Thank you.—J. M. (talk) 20:42, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

First of all: stop marking inappropriate edits as minor. Furthermore, if you vandalise an article again, as you did in your edit to New standard tuning, you will be blocked from editing.—J. M. (talk) 00:31, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.—J. M. (talk) 11:29, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Times Square Ball. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ViperSnake151 Talk 23:47, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) 15:29, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing. Specifically, repeated poor-quality edits, multiple warnings. Communication is required.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 15:43, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

S11141827 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here S11141827 (talk) 16:47, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please describe what you did wrong and what you will do instead. PhilKnight (talk) 17:57, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The Block is no longer necessary because I understand what I have been blocked for,
  will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  will make useful contributions instead.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

S11141827 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here S11141827 (talk) 12:15, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We're not making any progress here. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:59, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The Block is no longer necessary

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #58216

is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:06, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

S11141827 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What I did wrong was I caused disruptions, and damage. What I'll do instead is only make contributions.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 15:46, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Don't do this, please. You are not permitted to edit or remove declined unblock requests for your currently active block. You are free to make a new request. WP:GAB explains how and you'll want to read that before you do so, as your unblock requests so far won't convince anyone. --Yamla (talk) 17:15, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:59, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]