User talk:S10787091

S10787091, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi S10787091! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:15, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm Onel5969. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to The Who discography because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Onel5969 (talk) 03:00, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to The Who discography, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —Frosty ☃ 01:09, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Who

The Who is up for a peer review here. Please have a look. A number of longstanding editors have looked at the article carefully and fixed many faults. All content is currently verifiable to reliable sources, so please don't add any unsourced content as it is likely to be challenged and reverted. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 07:44, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Who discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Seeker (song). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Won't Get Fooled Again, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 21:38, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Who

I'm sorry to say that all your recent edits to The Who have had to be reverted.

Are you having difficulty using the Wikipedia interface or do you need help with locating information so it is verifiable? You may find the teahouse can offer assistance. As it is, the article is being worked on to be a future featured article candidate, so adding unsourced edits with no edit summary are highly likely to be reverted. Please respond here or on the article's talk page. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 08:40, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of number-one singles in Australia during the 1970s, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Squeeze Box. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:09, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The Who. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 20:53, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lenny Kravitz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Queen. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent disruptive editing, as you did at Green Day discography. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:48, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stop vandalising pages with fake sales figures. Or go buy a million copies of a CD to get its numbers to what you want. Noreplyhaha (talk) 02:54, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

S10787091 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

its been over a year now and i have my lesson to make up false information and make up lies, i would really like another chance

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 03:42, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, S10787091. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]