User talk:S-i-m-o-n

Edit war

You are edit warring rather than discussing, and are close to WP:3RR, which can be reported to an admin and result in a day's block. As you are a new user, I ask that you read and understand WP:PLOT and WP:FILM guidelines. We discuss things on talk pages, rather than edit-war.--Tenebrae (talk) 20:42, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That is only your interpretation. I'm sorry you feel that yours is the only correct interpretation. But it is only your POV. The movie does not specify. Since you feel the need to continue edit-warring after I asked for discussion, I am seeking admin intervervention. --Tenebrae (talk) 21:04, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are over-reacting by suggesting an Edit War, however, the accusation is becoming increasingly more reasonable if directed at yourself, consider your tone in such a short space of time. Please review the scene before continuing and avoid handing out warnings.

You have disparaged interpreting yet you are doing exactly that, or at least misinterpreting matters. The scene clearly shows him raise his finger to his temple to apply his ability as it did throughout the film, to ignore this for just one scene makes no sense whatsoever. As also stated, his dialogue also supports his actions, she promises not to reveal them and then he confirms with, "I know you won't". Should we therefore discount each and every instance of Charles's use of powers? The answer is No, of course. If MacTaggert stuck to her word, she would have given NO information but instead she recounts what fragments are left. If you feel this is worthy of a debate on the Talk page, you should start one. Don't be too proud to concede you might be wrong. Thank you.

S-i-m-o-n (talk) 21:38, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it is the start of an edit war. And you've made it clear that any removal of what you want in will be reverted with out discussion. Use the article's talk page to hash out what should and should not go into the plot summary - what is supposed to be a summary of limited length.

Also note that you have reached the point where WP:3rr comes into play and you have more than one editor contesting your addition.

- J Greb (talk) 21:53, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of WP:AN/EW report

Hello S-i-m-o-n,

This is an automated friendly notification to inform you that you have been reported for Violation of the Edit warring policy at the Administrators' noticeboard.
If you feel that this report has been made in error, please reply as soon as possible on the noticeboard. However, before contesting an Edit warring report, please review the respective policies to ensure you are not in violation of them. ~ NekoBot (MeowTalk) 21:45, 6 June 2011 (UTC) (False positive? Report it!)[reply]

June 2011

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:X-Men: First Class. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 22:42, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A summary of some guidelines you may find useful

Always cite a source for any new information, using <ref>reference tags like this</ref>, containing the name of the source, the author, page number, publisher or web address (if applicable).
Truth is not the criteria for inclusion, verifiability is.
We do not publish original thought nor original research not personal interpretation.
Reliable sources typically include: articles from magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards. User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided. Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment). Ian.thomson (talk) 23:00, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for that, Ian.

S-i-m-o-n (talk) 23:22, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 Hours for Edit Warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. FASTILY ^(TALK) 23:37, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]