Talk:X-Men: First Class

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the X-Men: First Class article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 90 days

X-Men: First Class has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 6, 2010	Articles for deletion	Kept
January 7, 2011	Peer review	Reviewed
July 1, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 12, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the planned Marvel Comics superhero film, X-Men: First Class is intended to take place during the 1960s and will parallel the history of Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X?
Current status: Good article

Film: British / Comic book / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Comic book films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Comics: Marvel / Films Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related work groups:
/
	This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group.
	This article is supported by Comic book films work group.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Cinema Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

2010s Low‑importance

	2010s portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject 2010s, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2010s on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.2010sWikipedia:WikiProject 2010sTemplate:WikiProject 2010s2010s articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2011.

Polish death camp

"In 1944, in a Polish death camp (...)". Politically incorrect. Polish government might get very angry after seeing this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.40.217.206 (talk) 09:24, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on X-Men: First Class. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=xmenfirstclass.htm
Added {{dead link}} tag to https://m.cinemascore.com/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://boxofficemojo.com/news/?id=3179&p=.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150704001210/http://www.lafca.net/years/2011.html to http://www.lafca.net/years/2011.html
Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/65olbBrXC?url=http://www.saturnawards.org/nominations.html to http://www.saturnawards.org/nominations.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:40, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on X-Men: First Class. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:22, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading Description of Box Office Performance

From the main page: "First Class premiered on Ziegfeld Theatre on May 25, 2011, and was released in the United States on June 3, 2011. It was a box office success, becoming the seventh highest-grossing in the film series, and received positive reviews from critics and audiences, who praised its acting, screenplay, direction, action sequences, visual effects, and musical score. "

At the time, it was the fifth film released in the series. First Class ended up 4/5 in worldwide gross and the least profitable X men at the time BigFDawg (talk) 00:17, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"X-Men 0" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect X-Men 0 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 18 § X-Men 0 until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 18:09, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to lede

Dark4tune has tried to force through edits to the lead three times now, reverting two other editors in the process. He has promised to discuss the issue on the talk page provided his version stays in situ. That is not how editing on Wikipedia works per WP:BRD and WP:STATUSQUO. The burden falls upon him to obtain a consensus for changing the lede. IMO, the revision offers less clarity and introduces WP:JARGON per "soft reboot". It is not apparent to the reader what a "soft" reboot means in this context. The original version adopts a real-world perspective and explains precisely how what was intended to be a reboot, was ret-conned into a prequel by later films. The original version is clear and factual, whilst the proposed revision introduces ambiguity. If Dark4tune really thinks his re-write is superior, then he should initiate a discussion and find support for his proposed version. Betty Logan (talk) 19:23, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this, Betty. Agreed that the previous version is better as it touches on the change from the initial plan. The fact that a third editor immediately came in and revised the initial rewrite when Dark4tune first made it gives weight to the fact that the revision did not, in fact, improve clarity.

In addition to the edits on this article, Dark4tune, these other edits suggest you are pushing a personal interpretation of the film franchise and its continuity that isn't supported by the longstanding versions of the articles. I'm tempted to restore the WP:STATUSQUO version of these. Betty Logan, thoughts? Grandpallama (talk) 20:02, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]