User talk:Ryulong/Archive 57

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Ryulong. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 50

←

Archive 55

Zoroark: Master of Illusions Plot

Hello, I'm new to wikipedia. I recently (couple hours ago) finished watching the movie on Cartoon Network On-Demand. Should I post the plot or just wait until the airing occurs?174.29.90.139 (talk) 20:27, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

You can go right ahead. Just don't make it very long.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 20:28, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

I just posted the plot (ignore my comments i was nervous and overjoyed). I was wondering if you could proof read/fix it174.29.90.139 (talk) 20:52, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

How does one add a recent air template like those on recently dead telling readers that the article will constanly be edited.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.29.90.139 (talk • contribs)

You don't have to.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:59, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Sentai 199

You said not to make the character's page, but what about the Super Sentai 35th anniversary film? ~Marvelous2011~ ( ★ AlienX2009 ★ ) 02:06, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

No. We only have one independent source on it.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 02:22, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

New revealed Pokemon

[1] [2] Could you take care of this? Thanks, _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 03:51, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Just say that advertisements are not reliable sources. Official Nintendo Magazine UK is questionable though.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 03:54, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Well, they are on IGN as well. Does that count any more? _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 17:16, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

If they're just screencaps in an article, don't use them.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 17:38, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

I hate Facebook Idiots

I got an offending message from the Pretty Cure Club in Faceboob HERE in my Wikipedia Talk PAGE! Their message:

Please stop deleting the Suite Precure Rumor character page. It's the real official rumored Pretty Cure characters from the official Anime 2010 magazine. The proof of source is located here:

Reference source

http://www.facebook.com/search.php?q=cure+beat&init=quick&tas=0.12518590717357503&type=groups#!/photo.php?fbid=198573373489664&set=o.170419669664221

If you continue to misbehave and continue to delete the rumored section, we, the Pretty Cure Fans leader, will complain your misknown deletion to the wiki admin. Because you don't know the rumored characters, we Precure Fans will give you a chance to change your deletion behaviour.

From the Pretty Cure Fans

What are they thinking?? Are they adding thing that are just rumors in the Suite PreCure because they're leaked and considered official?? JEEZ! Don't make me pull out a shotgun...do something about this! What rule are these people breaking?? DO SOMETHING!!!!!--Blackgaia02 (talk) 11:27, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

I will request that the page be protected.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 17:37, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Best Wishes

Do you know how to fix the " PokCharacter not recognized by string_indexmon</f " part at the top right of the page? I'm talking about on the pokemon best wishes page. SimpsonsMan1234 7:31pm February 9th, 2011 (UTC)

I don't see it.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 17:45, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

I see it. I don't know why, but the season name parameter does not like the "é" symbol. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 17:52, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

That's a new one.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 17:55, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

I've fixed it. Someone edited the template and it broke it.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 17:58, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

I've been unable to reproduce the problem described above, but I know for sure that the (hidden) link and font tags are not helping. Would it be acceptable to remove the link, use fgcolor, and give it another try? —LOL ^T/_C 19:44, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

If it wasn't broken for the longest time, why fix it in the first place?—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 19:49, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Because for the longest time, it incorrectly italicized text within parentheses. —LOL ^T/_C 21:46, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Well, that seems to affect all of the Pokémon episode lists because they are formatted differently.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 21:48, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

I discovered the issue. However, will your edit deal with the "List of X episodes" formatting?—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 21:56, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

What do you mean by "List of X episodes" formatting? My changes only involved the {{{season_name}}} parameter. I'm hoping to create a temporary category to track down articles that pass in > or [ characters. —LOL ^T/_C 22:03, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Well, I believe the issue with the template was how it was using a piped link rather than the font tags, as it was affecting all of the Pokémon episode lists.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 22:21, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Piped links are fine, as you can see here, but if the link target contains a left parenthesis then the code I added would fail. I don't believe links should be passed into {{{season_name}}} anyway because a link to the series page should be in the lead. How about we give this another try and see if the 'é' causes any problems? —LOL ^T/_C 23:28, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Well, I've removed all the piped links. And <br> tags putting the names on two lines. Go ahead.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 23:38, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Just fyi, it turns out that font tags are fine, but we should still be using fgcolor. I previously thought that they would contribute to the problem because equal signs are special characters, but MediaWiki has some tolerance. The only problem was having a piped link whose that contained a parenthesis. I had the infobox on my watchlist, but thank you for messaging me about the problem instead of simply undoing the edit. —LOL ^T/_C 01:00, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Barnstar!

		The Pokémon Barnstar
		For your efforts in keeping articles like List of Pokémon: Black & White episodes, List of Pokémon (494–545), (546–598) and (599–649) current and without un-sourced info in a hectic time where people are constantly trying to go against guidelines. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 04:24, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Most Recent Edit; Reliable source?

I have already made some minor edits, but as a fan of Pokémon, I am now questioning whether to add the link in the subsection of the article, Pokémon (anime), in relavance to the start date that I have confirmed on the official U.S. website.[3] I have not added this link because I fear that the URL that I was going to provide may not be a reliable source. CHAK 001 21:02, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

The episode came out, so its broadcast is enough of a reliable source.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 21:12, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for clarifying. CHAK 001 21:15, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

English dates in Japanese origin film infoboxes

Can I get your comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pokémon#English dates in film infoboxes? Thanks, _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 16:44, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Preemptive strike against the English release.

In the "List of Pokemon (xxx-xxx)" articles, I was going to change every name template from {{nihongo|Janovy|ジャノビー|Janobī}} to {{nihongo||ジャノビー|Janobī|Janovy}}, but realized it reordered the text and italicized it incorrectly. Would this warning be appropriate for the top of the three pages? (edit the page to see the code) _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 23:00, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Yeah that looks fine.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 23:06, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

The sad thing is, most IPs edit individual sections, so they won't see the notice in the lead. That's why I wanted it in every single nihongo template. Oh well... _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 23:16, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Hmm. I could set up an edit notice and bug someone to impliment it.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 23:18, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Copyright violation

Regarding Pokémon: Zoroark: Master of Illusions's plot, it has been copied from Bulbapedia without taking permission from the respective site and it's counted as a violation of Bulbapedia's policies. I would like to suggest you to remove the copyrighted from the respective article since you're an experienced user and know about the copyrights, thank you. ♫♪Adyniz♪♫ 14:24, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Blake took care of it.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 18:41, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Vector Marketing

Hey, there has been some revisions to Vector Marketing again that seem fishy. Would you care to have a look? The user is using the same pictures that AkankashaG used in our previous article dispute, so I am kinda worried. Phearson (talk) 02:06, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Reverted flat out.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 02:10, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Looks like we have another COI editor.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 02:19, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Sigh... I am exhausted with this. Would you in anyway think AkankshaG might be Sock-puppeting? Phearson (talk) 04:38, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

You can put forth an SPI report if you want.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 04:43, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Given the severity of last time, yes. I'll do that as soon as I am done typing up the COI-Notice. Phearson (talk) 05:51, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Done [4].
Editor seems to have left to create another account. CU has declined to check the account. Phearson (talk) 15:17, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Peru

When you wrote the following,

Non-notable school district (if that is possible).

did you actually mean something along these lines:

Non-notable school district (if a "notable" school district is even possible).

If you meant the former, it seems to me that you undercut your own point. HuskyHuskie (talk) 03:18, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

There is a long standing issue concerning the notability of schools on this project.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 03:27, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Oh, yes, I understand that, and am sympathetic to the argument. I'm talking about your choice of words to make your point. When you say, "if that is possible", it reads as if you are questioning whether a school district can be "non-notable", as opposed to what I suspect you mean, that you question whether or not a school district can be notable. Regardless of what you actually mean, your intention is very unclear. HuskyHuskie (talk) 15:04, 26 February 2011 (UTC)