User talk:Ryujg

Speedy deletion nomination of Solar salt

A tag has been placed on Solar salt, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. —Largo Plazo (talk) 02:31, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional material to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Acroterion _(talk) 03:40, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ryujg for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. —Largo Plazo (talk) 08:02, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusive use of alternate accounts and repeated addition of promotional material.. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 08:22, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

appealling my block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ryujg (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not advertising the solar salt, I just give the information about the solar salt to everyone using the wikipedia. Please unblock my page

Decline reason:

Unfortunately, a review of your edits suggests otherwise. Identifying the subject as "...the best gift from the nature" is clearly promoting that particular variety of solar salt. Articles must be neutral in tone. The sockpuppetry is more problematic; if you have an issue with other editors, you must discuss it with them. You cannot simply create extra accounts to push the issue or create the illusion of consensus. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 15:26, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note: Your article wasn't a general explanation of solar salt. It was a look specifically at Korean solar salt and spoke of how wonderful it is, and how it's better than any other solar salt. In other words, it was promotional. Further, you ignored the instructions when your article was originally put up for deletion, and kept removing the speedy deletion tag no matter how many times it was restored and you were warned, and then after you were blocked you created two new user accounts to evade the block. The entire time, you didn't respond a single time to any of the messages left for you, and showed a complete disregard for Wikipedia's policies and procedures. —Largo Plazo (talk) 12:22, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]