User talk:Rypcord

Leave a new message. Unless you request otherwise, I will respond here.
If I left a message on your talk page, please respond there. --User:Rypcord

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on User talk:MikeWazowski. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. MikeWazowski (talk) 15:05, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Like a little child crying and taking his ball home on the playground. The Rypcord. 21:18, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Minor edits

I notice you have marked many if not all your recent edits as minor -- however, few if any are what Wikipedia considers minor edits. Please be more circumspect in clicking in that checkbox, or change your default settings so that "mark all edits as minor" is no longer the default. Thank you! --EEMIV (talk) 01:31, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:HUM-Front.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:HUM-Front.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:46, 20 July 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 04:46, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Large hummlibrary.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Large hummlibrary.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:47, 20 July 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 04:47, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:OldHummelstownLibrary.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:OldHummelstownLibrary.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:58, 20 July 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 04:58, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:HUM-Front.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:HUM-Front.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:40, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Large hummlibrary.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Large hummlibrary.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:41, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:OldHummelstownLibrary.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:OldHummelstownLibrary.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:41, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:LDFalcons.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:LDFalcons.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk 03:36, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Hummelstownclimatechart.png

Thank you for uploading File:Hummelstownclimatechart.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk 03:41, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:LDHS-overhead.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:LDHS-overhead.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk 03:41, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:BPplayground.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:BPplayground.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk 03:41, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:BPpavilion.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:BPpavilion.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk 03:41, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Lollidrop.GIF

Thank you for uploading File:Lollidrop.GIF. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk 03:42, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:SwateracreekinHTown.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:SwateracreekinHTown.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk 03:42, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Parish house museum1.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Parish house museum1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk 03:42, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Doesn't make a difference how long they've been here - they files above don't have a copyright tag/template. From what you've stated, you can add either the tag {{GFDL-self}} or {{PD-self}} to the image page and remove the proposed deletion tag. There's just a slight difference between the two licenses - just click on them to read the details. (if you're cutting and pasting the templates from here, remove the t| )Skier Dude (talk 02:42, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Lollidrop.GIF

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lollidrop.GIF, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --MGA73 (talk) 08:20, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:53, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Ludwik Kowalski

Hello Rypcord. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Ludwik Kowalski, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 22:39, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Related shows

Hi. Per, Template: Infobox television the field is for "Related TV shows, i.e. remakes, spin-offs, adaptations for different audiences, etc." Futurama is not a related show to The Simpsons. Just because they were both created by Matt Groening does not meant they are actually related. Many people make many shows. Felicity and Lost were both created by J.J. Abrams but are not related in any of the ways listed above. You state "both reference each other numerous times, use the same chronology, and have shared characters, creators, writers, and animators." 1. Referencing another show does not mean it is related: The Simpsons has referenced hundreds of shows, and been referenced on hundreds more. 2. They do not use the same chronology: on Futurama, The Simpsons is frequently stated to be just a TV show and vice versa. 3. They do not have shared characters: Some, such as Bender, have appeared in very minor roles on The Simpsons. That is not a 'shared character'. The characters from Cheers, The X Files and 24 appeared on The Simpsons in far bigger roles. Should they be listed as 'related shows' as well? And 4. As stated about Groening, many writers and directors work on many different shows; a lot of old staffers work on Family Guy and The Cleveland Show now. That's not what 'related shows' means in this context. Gran² 15:20, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

• • Wow, your beyond hopeless. But whatever lets you feel big-boy pants on Wikipedia. I don't really care. But have at it. It's not something to get over. But I'll just point to the Futurama article itself on here and how it says its related to Simpsons, to numerous director/writer commentaries on the DVDs of both Simpsons and Futurama, as well as interviews, etc, from writers stating that Futurama shares the chronology/timeline inherited from Simpsons. See: Jurassic Bark etc.

But like I said. Enjoy your internet big boy pants. Ciao. The Rypcord. 16:35, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

That kind of tone is really not necessary. Please read WP:CIVIL. I was attempting to constructively explain why I believe that they are not related, based on Wikipedia's definitions of what a related show is. You know, because this is an encylcopedia, for facts and stuff. I have no intention to "feel big-boy pants on Wikipedia" as you, eloquently, put it. If you disagree with me, then I suggest you start a discussion on the talk page. Gran² 17:03, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Pennsylvania Farm Show (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to East Hanover, Grantville, Campbelltown, Derry Township and Londonderry Township

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited WrestleMania XXVIII, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Big Show (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library!

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!

Hi Rypcord! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! SarahStierch (talk) 14:33, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Rypcord. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: TheBeerThrillers (December 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SportingFlyer were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:TheBeerThrillers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:TheBeerThrillers, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SportingFlyer T·C 23:36, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Rypcord! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SportingFlyer T·C 23:36, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:TheBeerThrillers concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:TheBeerThrillers, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:TheBeerThrillers

Hello, Rypcord. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "TheBeerThrillers".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:59, 4 June 2020 (UTC)