User talk:Rwadhaawa

This is Rwadhaawa's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome

Hello Rwadhaawa and welcome to Wikipedia! I am Ukexpat and I would like to thank you for your contributions.

Getting Started First steps • FAQ • Article creation wizard Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting help Community Portal • Help desk • Teahouse • Village Pump Where to ask questions or make comments • Request administrator attention Wikipedia: The Missing Manual Place {{helpme}} on your talk page and a small message explaining the problem The Commmunity Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists		Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Click here to reply to this message.

ukexpat (talk) 14:15, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have Submitted Created Article For Review, Now What?

Dear Editors,

First of all, I would like to thank you all to help me in create my first article with your valuable feedback. Here, I have gathered and submitted possible sources for notability. Now, I have submitted my first article for review, but what now? should I have to wait, or shall I keep making possible edits?

I am new to Wiki, so it would be great if you can help me to improve it further to provide best possible information to the readers. here is the link where I have submitted my article for review. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Shriram_Automall_India_Ltd.

your feedback will be great help. thanks in advance Rwadhaawa (talk) 10:52, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shriram Automall India Ltd. has been accepted

Shriram Automall India Ltd., which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Mr RD (talk) 19:45, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

merge

Yes, see Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). Content about a company, its subsidiaries and its products should all be located together until the main article becomes too large or until the detailed coverage of one aspect is such that including it in the main article would be WP:UNDUE and a WP:SPINOUT article on the sub-topic can be created.

Given that currently, there are merely two stub articles, they should be combined. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 11:56, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The general process for a merge is outlined at WP:MERGE . Essentially, some or all of the contents of one article are added to a different article, and then the resulting article is continued to be edited make the article make sense while following the sources and complying with the policies and guidelines. The article that is merged is generally kept as a WP:REDIRECT so that someone searching for it gets sent to the new page where the content has been moved. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:19, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Thanks for your valuable suggestions. I'll try my best to add reliable information in this article to expand it further, if possible. otherwise merging would be the option. also, what is the procedure if some other editors from Wiki wants to improve it further? I mean, in that case, shall i have to provide them more information or will they search by themselves and improve it further? as I understand editors don't have that much of time for each and every individual article. kindly suggestRwadhaawa (talk) 11:51, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unless there is an overwhelming consensus before, timeframes for official processes on Wikipedia generally range from 1 week to 30 days. The official guidance Wikipedia:Merging#Step_4:_Close_the_merger_discussion_and_determine_consensus says a week and then uses 30 days in all of the specific advice, but since merger process is not one of the processes timed and tagged for official closure, they often remain "open" for a long time until someone decides to act.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:08, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, If in case I'll search and provide some more information to expand it further, then, In that case, the merge tag will be removed automatically or any editor has to remove the merge tag? as the link you shared, there is mentioned that within 1 week or a month if no discussion will happen, the merge will take place. what kind of discussion Wiki is referencing there?Rwadhaawa (talk) 12:28, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please Help Me in Creating A New Page

Hi Editors,

I am a mass communication student and learning about various verticles of media. Today, I would like to create a new Wiki page on renowned Indian media celebrity Pranav Sachdeva. I am new to this community and don't have much knowledge of creating a Wiki page, but I have tried my level best to citing reliable sources and seeking your help in this. Kindly help me out in creating this Wiki page where Indian media readers can get the useful information about this renowned person.

Here is the page draft for your kind reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Rwadhaawa/sandbox/Pranav_Sachdeva

Thanks in advance Rwadhaawa (talk) 17:21, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Need Valuable Suggestions in Creating A New Article

Hi Editors,

As a part of my recent research project on “how public relations impact the growth of a business”, I am looking forward to creating a Wiki page on renowned Indian PR strategist Vvihan Gulati.

I understand a few rules and regulations of Wikipedia, and thus I have tried my level best to citing reliable sources and now seeking further help from experienced editors on this.

Kindly help me creating this Wiki page where upcoming students/authors from the PR industry can get useful information about this person from the same industry.

Please share your useful thoughts to improve this information further. Thanks in advance!

Here is the page draft for your kind reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Vvihan_Gulati

Thanks in advance! Rwadhaawa (talk) 09:29, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vvihan Gulati (January 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tagishsimon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vvihan Gulati and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vvihan Gulati, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tagishsimon (talk) 12:46, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Tagishsimon: for your review! Unfortunately, my submission has been declined and I completely respect the decision you have made. But, it would be great if you can help me improve this article further by let me know a bit in detail what kind of proper notability would be required to improve the article or what changes I can do in terms of content as well to which helps in improve the article overall.

Looking forward to your positive response!

Rwadhaawa (talk) 15:29, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rwadhaawa! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tagishsimon (talk) 12:46, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can a Youtube Link from Renowned News Publications Consider as Notable Source?

Hi All,

I would like to know if a Youtube link from some renowned independent new source would be considered as a notable source or not? As there are a few authentic news links I have that I can provide to cite more notability to my submission, but those are video news from a renowned news channel on Youtube.

Please suggest! Rwadhaawa (talk) 11:45, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Saurabh Arora has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Saurabh Arora. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:10, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Rwadhaawa! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Need Suggestions & Help to Improve My Article Draft, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saurabh Arora (April 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kashmorwiki was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Saurabh Arora and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Saurabh Arora, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 16:57, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samira Gupta (May 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DGG were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Samira Gupta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Samira Gupta, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 08:30, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vvihan Gulati

Hello, Rwadhaawa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vvihan Gulati, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samira Gupta (July 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Samira Gupta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Samira Gupta, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 15:02, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Saurabh Arora

Hello, Rwadhaawa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Saurabh Arora, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Saurabh Arora

Hello, Rwadhaawa. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Saurabh Arora".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:49, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]