User talk:Russellsaccount

Welcome!

Hello, Russellsaccount, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Copper Ibuprofenate, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! A More Perfect Onion (talk) 18:09, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Copper Ibuprofenate

The article Copper Ibuprofenate has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not even stub grade information; conflict of interest by article's creator noted on talk page; article openly admits that little information is available.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. A More Perfect Onion (talk) 18:09, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Copper Ibuprofenate

I have nominated Copper Ibuprofenate, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Copper Ibuprofenate. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. A More Perfect Onion (talk) 18:15, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The result of the discussion was Keep. Swarm^(Talk) 06:25, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sign your posts

Greetings. It would be helpful if you signed your posts on talk pages with 4 tildes (~~~~). Regards, PDCook (talk) 19:42, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I was wondering how to to do that Russellsaccount (talk) 19:58, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copper Ibuprofenate

Please be sure that you cite reliable sources when you make additions to the Copper Ibuprofenate article, and that you understand Wikipedia's policy on original research. Thanks, PDCook (talk) 20:06, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Questions

{{helpme}} I am looking for more information on how to best help combat wiki vandalisim. I have herd of software, but I am lost about how to use it... or even download it.

Consider joining the CVU. You can always undo bad edits at NPP (found at Special:NewPages). For tools, consider using Twinkle, and when you have enough experience, apply for Rollback rights so you can use Huggle, which is easier to use. fetchcomms☛ 03:41, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your responce, I have read about htis stuff, but I was wondering if I could get some instruction on how to join the CVU, and download the tools or use the tools

There is nothing to do to "join" the CVU, just start undoing bad edits. To use Twinkle, go to Special:Preferences, and under "gadgets", check the box for "Twinkle". Then you will get some extra buttons allowing you to remove vandalism faster. The Twinkle page explains in more detail. Basically, go to Special:RecentChanges and click on "diff", allowing you to see the changes made in the edit. If the edits are vandalism, then you can click "undo" or, when Twinkle is installed, click the "rollback" button. Nothing to download for Twinkle! fetchcomms☛ 03:54, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} What is the most effective way to find vandelisim and remove it? my computer is now off, so please just leave responce here

The most effective way is Huggle, which camps out on recent changes. Josh Parris 05:07, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Russellsaccount! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:05, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

New deal for page patrollers

Hi Russellsaccount,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Andrew Pelling

Hello, Russellsaccount. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Andrew Pelling".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:32, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]