User talk:Ruskie kid

Welcome!

Hello, Ruskie kid, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Roberts list of greatest presidents, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- $Σ talk contribs$ 07:09, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Roberts list of greatest presidents

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Roberts list of greatest presidents, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- $Σ talk contribs$ 07:09, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that this is not promotional, and I have declined the speedy deletion nomination; but I am afraid it is still not suitable. You wrote: "This is a webaite where the voiceless can have a voice, so I should be allowed to express how I feel for all to see." Sorry, there are plenty of websites where you can express your opinions, but Wikipedia is not one of them: it is a project to build an encyclopedia, and one of its key policies is Wikipedia:No original research. If your read that policy, you will understand why I have proposed your page for deletion - formal notice below. The links in the Welcome notice above will tell you more about Wikipedia. JohnCD (talk) 08:50, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Roberts list of greatest presidents

The article Roberts list of greatest presidents has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

this is an individual's opinion, but Wikipedia does not publish original research.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JohnCD (talk) 08:50, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Roberts list of greatest presidents for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roberts list of greatest presidents is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roberts list of greatest presidents until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JohnCD (talk) 21:01, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to House music, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dawnseeker2000 01:55, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at House music. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dawnseeker2000 04:08, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to House music, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: House music was changed by Ruskie kid (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.963216 on 2011-11-05T03:04:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:04, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at House music, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dawnseeker2000 03:07, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Kinu ^t/_c 03:20, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]