User talk:Rupeshbhojne

Rupeshbhojne, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Rupeshbhojne! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Rupeshbhojne, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Rahul Chahar have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page.

Also note that Wikipedia articles must be written in a neutral tone. The text you added would have been inappropriate even if it wasn't copyrighted, because it was promotional. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 06:44, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Rupeshbhojne! You created a thread called New article review at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cricket, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bowler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Links

Hi,

I just removed the wikilcnks you'd added to Dinesh Karthik. The reasons for this are:

Ranji Trophy is already linked in the article - and in that section of the article. So it's not appropriate to link it again. See WP:OLINK for details
the two links to locations (Tamil Nadu and Punjab) were linked to the actual geographical locations, not to the teams he played against. If they haven't already been linked in the article (I suspect Tamil Nadu has) then it might be appropriate to link to the actual teams involved.

I hope that helps explain why I changed your edits. Blue Square Thing (talk) 12:04, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You really need to read this ^ and try to understand what I'm saying about what to link and what not to link. I appreciate that English may not be your first language, but you can always run it through Google Translate or ask someone who speaks better English if necessary. Blue Square Thing (talk) 12:11, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It might be helpful if you could give me any form of response here to show that you understand. Just a "Yes, I understand" is OK. I know you're trying to help, but you could use trying to think first really. Blue Square Thing (talk) 12:49, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chris Hemsworth. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 12:31, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Chris Hemsworth, you may be blocked from editing. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 12:44, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Men in Black: International. bonadea contributions talk 14:34, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Rupeshbhojne. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 23:03, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Aamir Khan. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Begoon 12:04, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Aamir Khan. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Begoon 12:05, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: regarding this, please have a good look at wp:OVERLINK. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 13:16, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of OMH (Oh My Hrithik)

Hello Rupeshbhojne,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged OMH (Oh My Hrithik) for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

MrClog (talk) 15:18, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Hello Rupeshbhojne. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to OMH (Oh My Hrithik), but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Rupeshbhojne. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Rupeshbhojne|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. MrClog (talk) 15:21, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Edits made by me was not done for any promotional use. I don't receive or expect to receive any compensation for my edits. "The page should have not got deleted because it was regarding women fantasies. The reason behind creating this page is to remove the stigma and guilt attached to female self-pleasure and fantasies".

I make sure that I will follow all the Wikipedia rules before submitting any article to Wikipedia.

Speedy deletion

Hey! Before I get into OMH, please read the above message about undisclosed paid editing and respond to it, thanks. :)You said: "The page should not get deleted because it is regarding women fantasies. The reason behind creating this page is to remove the stigma and guilt attached to female self-pleasure and fantasies". Please note that the page was deleted because it was exclusively promotional, so if you believe there should still be a page, I advise you to one via the Article wizard. Thanks, MrClog (talk) 08:24, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Mrunal Thakur.

As advised above, you need to read WP:OVERLINK, and you absolutely must not add wikilinks to incorrect or misleading pages.

Even more importantly: You have to address the question of paid editing - you were asked not to make any more edits until you had addressed that. bonadea contributions talk 07:20, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Your addition to Ritesh Sidhwani has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:11, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sanya Malhotra. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:16, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Justification for creative commons

You uploaded this image as File:Ananya panday.jpg and claimed that it free to use under Creative Commons Licensing. How do you justify that when there is no Creative Commons release? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:51, 27 February 2020 (UTC).[reply]

The source of the this image is of her official Instagram account. Ananya Panday info image to be updated as she has been awarded best debut actress filmfare awards. Thus this professional looking image is free to use.

What do you mean by "Ananya Panday info image to be updated ". Are you getting paid by her? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:01, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The source of the this image is of her official Instagram account ... Thus this professional looking image is free to use. Rupeshbhojne, you clearly have no idea what you are talking about, as you seem to lack even a basic understanding of copyright restrictions. The person who takes a photo is the person who typically holds the copyright, not the person in the photo. And by default, we assume that any creative work, whether it is a photo, a song, a book, a TV show, or even advertising copy, is copyrighted unless explicitly released for other use. Panday using this image on her Instagram page does not mean she owns the copyright, it does not mean that she even has a legal right to use the image, and it does not mean that the image is free to use. So making that assumption without actually knowing what you're talking about or seeking out a proper copyright license is totally unhelpful and exposes Wikipedia to potential copyright violation. If you make any more changes like this or upload any more problematic images, you're going to wind up with your editing privileges revoked. I strongly recommend you quickly verse yourself with our copyright policies on the matter or avoid this area entirely. Further, if you are somehow connected to Panday, you should not be editing her article, as that would represent a clear conflict of interest. And if you are being paid by her or anyone else to maintain articles, you must disclose that fact per WP:PAID. If you wish to respond, please do so below, not on my talk page. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:27, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nadiadwala Grandson Entertainment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Best Director (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:32, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion, for your routine injection of non-neutral, promotional language into articles, including here and here and here.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:38, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rupeshbhojne (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will make sure to follow all the wikipedia guidelines for editing or creating a page and may not repeat my mistake Rupeshbhojne (talk) 07:13, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I see on this page that you have said that before, and failed to do so, so your mere promise is insufficient. You also have not addressed your promotional editing. You will need to demonstrate your understanding of guidelines by explaining specifically what you did wrong, how you will not do it again, and what contributions you will make going forward that comply with guidelines. I am also aware through evidence that I am not allowed to share publicly that you are a paid editor and/or have a conflict of interest that you have not disclosed. You will need to disclose that as well. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 11:02, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rupeshbhojne (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will be Be clear, Be as concise as possible, Emphasize the spirit of the rule, Maintain scope and avoid redundancy, Avoid overlinking and Not contradict each other Yes I agree that I have made promises earlier as well but here and here and here I have only updated the content as per my knowledge and research done by me. My only purpose was to update the section with the knowledge I have and share it on Wikipedia so that everyone can grab the knowledge. I had not done any advertising or promotion for any of the edit, but Yes I made mistakes in not Omiting needless words but I make sure it won't happen again. Rupeshbhojne (talk) 06:50, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Nowhere near sufficient, plus this demonstrates you lack sufficient ability to write grammatically correct English to be unblocked. Yamla (talk) 11:02, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.