User talk:Runwayz

Welcome!

Hello, Runwayz, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! JarrahTree 14:54, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kelley Wise

Hello, Runwayz. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Kelley Wise, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Kelley Wise to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:52, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kelley Wise

Hi. Is there anything else for which she is known? Being a patent holder isn't enough to establish notability. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:59, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but it appears you have written or added to an article about yourself, at Kelley Wise. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 01:36, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits to Talk:Kelley Wise could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 03:23, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is harming the rights of inventors and allowing defamation and disparagement to occur by allowing unqualified moderators to make comment on constitutional law and the legal validity of patents that are already issued by the United States US patent office. Runwayz (talk) 03:32, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unqualified editors have no right to comment on patent law if they are not patent lawyers and are automatically disqualified for making such statements on Wikipedia regardless of the terms of service of Wikipedia it is still a violation of Law and a cause of action in any civil court making note of those statements is not a threat and it shows furthermore how unqualified the editors of Wikipedia are to make comments about any kind of patent law and inventors for that matter. Runwayz (talk) 03:33, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article about Kelley wise contains statements of fact provided by the US government which show without a doubt that Kelly was invented streaming to a browser and streaming to a buffer and streaming to a virtual machine in 2002 and all recent patents issued are just continuations of the same 2002 patent as per US law Runwayz (talk) 03:37, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Legal threat at Talk:Kelley Wise

Per guidelines, since there was a legal threat, have reported it at ANI, and am informing you. Take care. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:29, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. Someguy1221 (talk) 03:36, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Runwayz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #17292 was submitted on Jan 08, 2017 03:54:55. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 03:54, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]