User talk:RunOrDie

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, RunOrDie! My name is Ryan, aka Acetic Acid. I noticed that you were new and haven't received any messages yet. I just wanted to see how you were doing. Wikipedia can be a little intimidating at first, since it uses different formatting than other sites that use HTML and CSS. In the long run, though, you'll find that the WikiSyntax is a lot easier and faster than those other ways. Here are a few links to get you started:

There are a lot of policies and guides to read, but I highly recommend reading over those first. If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Please be sure to sign your name on Talk Pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, along with a link to your user page. This way, others know when you left a message and how to find you. It's easier than having to type out your name, right? :)

I hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. We can use all the help we can get! Have a nice day. Sincerely, Acetic Acid 05:46, August 24, 2005 (UTC)

Revision of vandalism

I, Dbraceyrules, hereby give you this WikiDefender Barnstart in light of the fact that you have contributed so much to ridding Wikipedia of vandalism yet you have only been here one day.

Take care, D. J. Bracey (talk) 22:37, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Also take this Exceptional Newcomer Award as well. D. J. Bracey (talk) 22:37, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Take care, D. J. Bracey (talk) 22:37, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism patrol

Hi RunOrDie, I've noticed you reverting a lot of vandalism. Thanks! One thing, though. The criterion for speedy deletion about "nonsense" is actually quite restrictive. It only applies to things that are literally unreadable, like "EWH SDJ@ DFSDFOjjsij". An article like Penguin Prostitutes has a lot wrong with it, but it's not "nonsense" by that definition, and it doesn't qualify for speedy deletion. (I think it's actually a copyright violation from one of those emails that get forwarded all over the place.) Anyway, thanks again for your anti-vandalism! FreplySpang (talk) 02:34, August 25, 2005 (UTC)

Good Work!

RunOrDie good work on RV:ing vandalism, are You a previous user by chance?? Best for the future, feydey 22:02, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No I'm not, and thanks! RunOrDie 02:00, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting MARMOT on my page! Bishonen | talk 03:33, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Good work, thanks! --Mista-X 04:45, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Our forum

Welcome to the Romanian Wikipedia notice board! This page is a portal for all Romanian-related topics and a place for Romanian editors to gather and socialize and debate. Discussions are encouraged, in both English and Romanian. Post any inquiry under their relevant cathegory.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Romanian_Wikipedian%27s_notice_board

--Anittas 19:48, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander for Admin

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Alexander_007 ,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship#Alexander_007 . I've nominated User:Alexander_007 as admin. Let's vote for him! -- Bonaparte talk & contribs 20:12, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

False Information!

You can explain why this post was removed! This post contains information designed to protect consumers from this company and the false information they are providing about their product! Do you even use Realbasic! I want you to prove that any of this information is wrong! Want evidence of the user complaints I listed then visit Real Software's feedback system (which they did not put in their artcle) and search for "Realbasic: IDE: not listed". Want proof of the other statements then I have screen shots of RB in any version you would like. So you consider informing consumers about the problems people have with this company and its product vandalism? I didn't relaize Wikopedia was here to provide free advertising for Real Software.

Please prove anything I have said is wrong! If you want the sentance concerning a boycott gone because thats my personal request, but the rest is going to stay as its fact.

Regarding REALbasic... Wikipedia isn't your personal bashing ground. If you feel an article needs to be substantially modified, use its talk page and reach a consensus. Adding endless pages of biased complaining isn't the answer. RunOrDie 00:11, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Wikipedia isn't your personal bashing ground."

Yes, it the place for facts, so what facts are incorrect in my post? Please tell me, or don't you know because you dont even use RB?

Does RB use a Mac interface? No! (That's even confirmed in RS own information). What a complete and utter dumbass!

Nice how you edited my message, just goes to show you what type of Nazi you really are.

Your statement that the article was greatly modified is false. I simply added information to the article and left the previous content intact with my first edit. However, this additional content was removed. If you are not going to let others add facts to this article then it needs to removed.

Lets see, Does RB 2005 run on Classic? No, check RS's won web site.

Want proof of the remaining statements then look at RB 2005 and 5.5.5!

Vandal tags

Thank you for reverting vandalism on Wikipedia!

Be sure to put warning tags on the vandal's user talk page (such as {{subst:test}}, {{subst:test2}}, {{subst:test3}}, {{subst:test4}}). Add each of these tags on the vandal's talk page, in sequential order, after each instance of vandalism. Adding warnings to the talk page assists administrators in determining whether or not the user should be blocked. If the user continues to vandalize pages after you add the {{subst:test4}} tag, request administrator assistance at Request for Intervention. Again, thank you for helping to make Wikipedia better. —Tobias Bergemann 10:34, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you were reverting some linkspam. There are warning tags for this type of vandalism as well. Don't forget to place the warnings so we have good reason to block the vandals. Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam has some more info on linkspam. The first warning for spam is {{subst:spam}}. Mrtea (talk) 06:33, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Babe Ruth

I'm posting this message on you Talk Page either because you've contributed to the article Babe Ruth, or because you've edited other baseball or sports related articles. I've recently completed a revision of this article at Babe Ruth/rewrite. If you have the time, I'd appreciated it if you'd compare the articles and leave any feedback you might have on the rewrite discussion page. I'd like to reach a consensus before makeing major changes to the main article. Thanks for your help. --djrobgordon 20:24, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Romania

Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in contributing to WikiProject Romania. It is a project aimed at organizing and improving the quality and accuracy of articles related to Romania. Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 04:47, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, RunOrDie. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]