User talk:Rukkiet

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Rukkiet (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Disruptive editing

Blocking administrator: Lord Roem (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You are now directly blocked because of your abuse of multiple accounts to continue your disruptive editing. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:18, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rukkiet (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is my single account. I have connect internet from my university Boing! said Zebedee please unblock me now!!

Decline reason:

You post an unblock request in which you claim that you have not used any other accounts, and when you are presented with evidence showing that you have, you admit that you did so in order to hide what you were doing from other editors, and you think that is a reason to be unblocked??? Consider yourself lucky that I have decided not to block you indefinitely, since you have made it clear that you are not to be trusted. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:35, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Here's the way it looks to me...

You created a number of unusual templates, containing content taken from Wikipedia articles, and when they were nominated for deletion you blanked them. One example is Template:2017 Chang FA Cup (I have since deleted them in accordance with WP:G7 but admins can still see them). At about the same time, User:RKC36 started creating exactly the same kind of templates (eg Template:2017 Chang FA Cup C1), and was blocked. And then User:RKC37 was created, and immediately started creating exactly the same kind of templates (eg Template:2017 T3 Lower C2). All of these accounts appear to be operating from the same IP address or address range (I can't see those IP addresses as I do not have sufficient access rights, but the IP unblock appeals make it clear). Can you explain all of this? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:42, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Boing! said Zebedee I create the template to draft my updating and send all of data to main article. What can I do now.

What you can do now is explain the connection between those three accounts. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:22, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Boing! said Zebedee(talk) All is my new account but I created all of them to help unblock my drafting page. Unblock me!! There are many Thai football page that I must to update now. Results of 2017 SCG Muangthong United F.C. season 2017 Bangkok United F.C. season 2017 Chonburi F.C. season 2017 Ratchaburi Mitr Phol F.C. season 2017 Sukhothai F.C. season 2017 Chiangrai United F.C. season 2017 Police Tero F.C. season 2017 Suphanburi F.C. season still not updated. If you still block me, all of these will not updated.

When your edits are contested, is is not acceptable to blank them and continue doing them from another account. In order to be unblocked, we would need an unblock request that explains what you were doing and why you were apparently trying to evade scrutiny by using different accounts, and which convinces a reviewing admin that you will stop your problematic behaviour and will discuss things and try to reach a consensus instead. And those strange large templates you were creating by copying content from existing articles are certainly unconventional, and they would need explanation and consensus. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:07, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Boing! said Zebedee(talk) I do that because I need to hide my drafted template from public to prevent confusion if someone is involved my drafting. You understand, don't you? I have improve many article about Thai Football League for long time such as results, statistics, developments, references, and etc. I am an expert abut all Thai football system. My editing is always reliable. I have up loaded official logo of Thai football league such T1, T2, T3, and T4 with sponsored. I have a lot of grace with articles about Thai football. You have better ways if I need to draft my site before add it to public articles, haven't you? Before edit public articles I must to drafting it to check any mistake. In my draft, I need privacy. Update data about Thai football is my happiness but it had broken down by your blocking. Many Thai football articles waiting for me.

บอกแล้วว่า อย่าเปลี่ยนแปลงเยอะ เพราะพวกแอดมินคนอื่นเขามองเพจบอลไทย ความดังยังไม่เยอะพอที่จะทำตามแบบสากลทั้งหมด

ไอ่ที่จะสร้างเพจลูก เช่น ตารางคะแนน รายละเอียดการแข่งขัน ไปไว้ต่างหาก, เปลี่ยนการใช้รูปแบบตารางและเรียกชื่อย่อ เป็นต้น ไม่ใช่ผมไม่เคยทำนะ ผมเคยทำโดยเฉพาะสร้างเพจลูก ตอนรายงานบอลถ้วย 2016 Thai League Cup แต่โดนปฏิเสธ เพราะ บอลไทยดังไม่พอที่จะทำแบบนี้ ดังนั้นเพื่อเซฟตัวเองให้สามารถเป็นหนึ่งในทีมงานแก้ไขต่อไปได้ เห็นรูปแบบปีที่ผ่านมาสร้างแบบไหน ก็สร้างแบบนั้นละครับ ผมเตือนท่านหลายครั้งเรื่องนี้ แต่ท่านไม่เคยฟัง คนอื่นเขาไม่ใจดีแบบผมนะครับ ที่อะลุ่มอะล่วย พบกันครึ่งทาง เขารวมรวบข้อมูลส่งให้แอดมินใหญ่ตัดสินแบนเลย ไม่มีคุยกันก่อน ที่เห็นคนอื่นเขาไม่ว่าอะไร แต่ลับหลังคุณ เขาทำแบบนี้แหละ Aquaelfin (talk) 2:14, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Aquaelfin (talk)ที่ผมโดนแบนไม่ใช่เพราะผมพยายามทำบอลไทยให้เป็นสากลหรอก มันเป็นสิ่งที่ควรทำอยู่แล้ว เพราะอีกหน่อยบอลไทยก็จะกลายเป็นศูนย์กลางอาเซียน ผมรักบอลไทย ผมก็อยากจะให้การนำเสนอข้อมูลเป็นอย่างมืออาชีพ แม้แต่ลิ้งรายงานผล แทนที่จะเป็นหน้าข่าว ผมก็อุตสาห์ไปควานหาใบสรุปผลการแข่งขันของสมาคมฟุตบอลมาแปะ ผมใส่แม้กระทั่งจำนวนผู้เข้าชมและชื่อผู้ตัดสินด้วยซ้ำ แต่ที่ผมพลาดคือผมอยากสร้าง Template ที่ไม่มีใครมองเห็นขึ้นมาเพื่อเป็นกระดาษทด ตรวจสอบความถูกต้องก่อนจะก็อปข้อมูลที่ผมตรวจสอบแล้วไปลงในเพจจริง ทั้งผลการแข่งขัน สถิติผู้เข้าชม คลีนชีท ฯลฯ ผมอยากสร้างกระดาษทดเป็นของตัวเอง แต่ก็ดันมีคนเข้าไปเจอจนได้ พอผมย้ายหนีก็ยังมีคนตามไปจับผิด ทั้งๆที่ผมก็ไม่ได้แท็กอะไรให้ใครมองเห็นเลยด้วยซ้ำ ผมแค่อยากได้ความเป็นส่วนตัวในพื้นที่ใดพื้นที่หนึ่งเพื่อตรวจสอบความถูกต้องของข้อมูลก่อนที่จะนำเสนอมันออกสู่สาธารณะชนก็เท่านั้นเอง Template ที่ผมสร้างขึ้นเป็นกระดาษทดนี้ไม่เกี่ยวกับ Template ของตารางคะแนน เพราะ Template ตารางคะแนนผมแท็กเป็นสาธารณะทุกคนสามารถเข้าไปแก้ไขได้

แต่เท่าที่อ่านพวกแอดมินเข้ามาแบน เขาบอกว่าคุณแก้ไขแบบโดยพลการ ไม่ได้ปรึกษาคนพวกนี้ (Disruptive editing) และทำเพจลูกที่คุณเรียกว่า template โดยไม่ได้รับอนุญาต ตราบใดที่คุณยังไม่ได้เป็นแอดมินใหญ่คุมเรื่องการสร้างเพจบน wiki ฝ่ายกีฬา อย่าไปเปลี่ยนแปลงอะไรเยอะ ไม่งั้นเดี๋ยวเขาก็มีเรื่องมาแบนคุณอีก แล้วคราวนี้เขาจะแบนคุณนานกว่าเดิมด้วย ถ้าคุณคิดอยากจะลงข้อมูลต่อไป ก็ทำตามที่เขาอยากให้คุณทำก่อนครับ หรือสิ่งที่ผมแนะนำจากประสบการณ์เคยเจอกับตัวเอง จนกว่าคุณเป็นแอดมินใหญ่ตามที่ผมบอก คราวนี้จะทำอะไรก็ตามใจคุณเลย (ก็คุณและผมเป็นแค่ลูกน้องเขา จะทำอะไรมากได้ครับ) ปล. แท็ก template ที่คุณใช้ ไม่ใช่คนไปแก้ไขง่ายๆ นะครับ ถ้าเอาคำไปแป๊ะที่ google หลายครั้งก็หา template นั้นไม่เจอ นี้ผมเก็บ link template นั้นไว้เลยถึงเข้าไปแก้ไขโดยง่าย Aquaelfin (talk) 7:11, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Aquaelfin (talk) ไม่ใช่หรอก เรื่องมันเป็นแบบนี้ ผมสร้าง draft ขึ้นมาในรูปแบบของ template เพราะผมไม่รู้จะ draft ไว้ตรงไหนดี แล้วดันมีคนเข้าไปเห็นแล้วมาต่อว่าผมว่าใช้ template ผิดประเภท แล้วแท็กผมไปคุยใน discussion ประจำวัน ผมไม่อยากยุ่งกับพวกเค้า ผมเลยสร้าง account ขึ้นมาแล้วย้าย draft หนี ก็มีคนตามไปจับผิดว่าผมใช้หลาย account เพื่อหลีกเลี่ยงที่จะตอบโต้กับพวกเค้า นี่ผมก็เพิ่งรู้ว่าเค้ามีวิธีสร้าง draft ของตัวเองขึ้นมาโดยเฉพาะ ไม่ต้องไปยุ่งกับ template เพราะ template มันคือแม่แบบที่เอาไปแปะในหน้าหลักต่างๆ การแก้ไข template ตารางคะแนน ไม่ต้องเซฟลิ้งไว้ก็เข้าไปแก้ได้โดยกดตรงตัว E ที่อยู่มุมตาราง แล้วมันจะเข้าแก้ยัง template โดยตรง สำหรับ template ที่เป็นตารางคะแนนต่างๆไม่ได้มีปัญหาอะไร ที่เป็นปัญหาเพราะผมเอา template ไปสร้าง draft ซึ่งมันเป็นการใช้งานผิดประเภทเท่านั้นเอง อย่างที่คุณว่าแหละคนพวกนี้จ้องแต่จะจับผิดคนอื่น ไม่ได้ดูหรอกว่าเค้าสร้างอะไรไว้บ้าง

Orphaned non-free image File:Surat Thani City, 2016.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Surat Thani City, 2016.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:50, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Rukkiet. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Banbueng 2017.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Banbueng 2017.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Thai Honda, Feb 2017.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Thai Honda, Feb 2017.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Krabi FC 2012.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Krabi FC 2012.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:54, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:M-150 Championship 2017.png

A tag has been placed on File:M-150 Championship 2017.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ‑‑V.S.(C)(T) 09:00, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Nakhon Ratchasima Mazda, Feb 2017.png

Thank you for uploading File:Nakhon Ratchasima Mazda, Feb 2017.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:13, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Watcharapong Janngam for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Watcharapong Janngam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Watcharapong Janngam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 21:32, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]