User talk:Rtiztik

This is Rtiztik's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1

Archives

April 19, 2006–September 7, 2008

RE:

Ah so you've found a leak? (Sorry if there's any typos, one of my hands and all the fingers on it are numb). --The Guy _complain ^edits 01:31, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I got mine yesterday, I'm just excited to see how the album does popularity-wise :D. --The Guy _complain ^edits 01:56, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll edit it tomorrow, I have to go do homework right now, so I'll expand it tomorrow. See you dude. --The Guy _complain ^edits 02:21, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Personal pages

Hi. I've noticed you've put a few personal articles in your user space such as here and here. Now, you should be aware that such pages are a violation of (mainly) Wikipdia's policy on personal webpages as well as guildlines on user pages. Now, I don't want to be a kill joy personally but you should be aware that such pages are most likely candidates for miscellany for deletion. Perhaps you'd like to address the issue yourself. Rehevkor ✉ 19:24, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dating

Just a little protip here; the dating system used in Wikipedia allows for any input of standard dating (such as the European D M Y [12 November 2008] versus the American M D, Y [November 12, 2008]) and it will output in whatever your preference is set to display. If the code is written as [[12 November]] [[2008]], it is not necessary to always change it to [[November 12]], [[2008]]. --Jacob ^Talk 17:22, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think every date in the entire page needs to use the {{start date}}? I would say only in the infoboxes, and tables.--Jacob ^Talk 22:26, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

4:13 Dream

The wikilinking of dates is deprecated, so they should be unlinked as per MOS:SYL. Also WP:DATES#Dates states that the date format in the article should be consistent: "Dates in article body text should all have the same format." They weren't, so I've changed them to be consistent and, as is usual for non-American articles, I've used the British date format. Being consistent with other articles related to The Cure isn't necessary, especially when date formats aren't used consistently across such articles. Please stop reverting to inconsistent formats and to deprecated wikilinking. I will consider any such further reverting to vandalism and this may result in your account being blocked. --JD554 (talk) 14:04, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm curious as to how you're defining "best articles". If you look at Category:FA-Class Album articles (which is how the best album articles should be defined) you'll see that there are currently 46 of them. Of those 46 albums there are 12 that are by non-North American singers/bands—that includes one by The Cure (Disintegration). All 12 of those articles use day month year as the date format and that includes the use of the {{Start date}} template in the infobox as you can use the df=yes parameter to put the day first. So please stop changing the dates from day month year to month day year. --JD554 (talk) 06:41, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The "Empact"

Hey, I've commented at Talk:Eminem's sixth studio album#Empack/Empact.; the sources in question are ultimately insufficient to justify the addition of that information, especially since the two people couldn't even agree on the spelling. There is no hurry to have the info added, wait until it's been officially confirmed. GlassCobra 09:56, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cut & paste move of Saw: The Videogame

I noted you did a cut & paste move. Doing this violates the GFDL and Wikipedia policy. If you believe a page move is justified, please follow the instructions at wikipedia:requested moves. Thanks. --Rogerb67 (talk) 01:58, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sputnikmusic

As there are now 10 reviews on 4:13 Dream I won't re-add the staff review from Sputnikmusic. But if you look at WP:ALBUM#Review_sites you'll see that staff reviews are allowed. Please make yourself aware of guidelines that have been in place for a long time before making such statements as "Sputnikmusic is not professional. Stop adding it." Thanks, --JD554 (talk) 16:01, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As you are aware of the guideline then you should have WP:AGF and followed the link to see. Yes, other Sputnikmusic reviews do get removed when they are not staff reviews, but staff reviews are allowed. Please be more careful in future. --JD554 (talk) 17:09, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relapse

I don't know which paragraph your looking at, but the paragraph under the one you deleted is not better than the one you deleted. Plus, Dr. Dre and DJ Premier rap and produce, so they deserve to be on there as well. Hairy Perry 18:39, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for the explanation, but some people have the same views as me, so watch out it might get changed again, just a heads up, thanks, Hairy Perry 18:49, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously dude, everytime I throw out a suggestion you don't have to get a smart ass attitude, it is just a suggestion. I try to be civil then people like you ruin it for people and you are really starting to get on my nerves. So, why don't you be more cool, calm, and collected towards things before you make another smart ass remark. Hairy Perry 14:16, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't recall calling you any names, I called your attitude smart assed sure did. Just because you didn't roll with my suggestion thats not why I'm mad you've been making smart ass remarks since the day that I saw you on here when Apawk was harrasing you on the Relapse Talk Page, you've been nothing but rude to me even though I try to be the best editor I can be, but you on the other hand want to make it hard for people when all I want to is make a suggestion if it gets turned down thats fine, but if it doesn't then thats cool too. But when somebody says "Or we could just leave it like it is" or something to that extent then thats what gets on my nerves. Hairy Perry 15:26, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your a smartass person in nature, but I've had really rough morning and i don't think you would care if you had offended a thousand people cause you only care about yourself and back on the Relapse talk page, Apawk said "Rtiztik go take a bath in shit" because I went after him for saying that and eventually got him blocked as a sock puppet and puppeteer. So yes he did, but I'm going to stop right there cause I have much more to say but I will not because this is not the time nor place for it. Hairy Perry 16:02, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Yeah he wasn't talking about you was he? Scroll all the way down to the last comment and it was made by Apawk directed at you. Hairy Perry 16:28, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your right dude, my bad i don't know you, but the way I read it it sounded like a smart ass remark, its my fault man i haven't met any real dicks on here yet but i'm sure I will. My bad for the inconvinience. Later, Hairy Perry 18:20, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah man definetly no hard feelings, I just had a really rough morning and then got on here, man I regret getting on here this morning, I should have just cooled off and then got on. I knew that I was going to read something the wrong way it is all totally my fault, you did everything right, its my bad that I said all that, btw it sounds like I'm the one who is smart assed nature not you. Hey would you mind if I added you to Users I'm Cool With on my user page? Hairy Perry 19:59, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Capitilization

[2] Why did you make this edit? Hip Hop needs to be capitilized. Thanks, Hairy Perry 18:33, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dude really, theres no need to get all smart. Just asking why. A simple explanation would have been a lot nicer. Hairy Perry 19:18, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Old Stuff, Part Two

An article that you have been involved in editing, Old Stuff, Part Two, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Old Stuff, Part Two. Thank you. Neelix (talk) 18:43, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Image-IllBillTheEarlyYears.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Image-IllBillTheEarlyYears.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 06:53, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Oldstuffparttwo.jpg)

You've uploaded File:Oldstuffparttwo.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:24, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Theearlyyears88-91.jpg)

You've uploaded File:Theearlyyears88-91.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:22, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Punisher - Punisher:Frank Castle

Even when a comic has a name change, the issues that already came out do not change title. The artwork used in the punisher article is from "Punisher 31" - it cannot be from Punisher:Frank Castle 31 because such a comic does not exist. Only issues and artwork going forward correspond to that title. --Cameron Scott (talk) 11:29, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Punisher-The end.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:Punisher-The end.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 05:03, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Punisher-The end.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:Punisher-The end.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 05:03, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Criminal Intents / Morning Star: Double Feature EP

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Criminal Intents / Morning Star: Double Feature EP, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non-notable unreleased album with little or no media coverage of substance. Fails WP:NALBUMS.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. TheJazzDalek (talk) 20:44, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Another E.P.

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Another E.P., suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

notability is not established

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Boston (talk) 03:18, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Anotherep.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Anotherep.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:11, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Schumin

Don't worry about Ben. The man has a history of abusing adminship and obesity. Don't take his flabbiness to heart. 86.40.221.93 (talk) 11:45, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Secret Society (album)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Secret Society (album), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non-notable unreleased album with little or no media coverage of substance. Fails WP:NALBUMS.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. TheJazzDalek (talk) 00:12, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Sonsofbutcher.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Sonsofbutcher.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 10:26, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Sonsofbutcher.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sonsofbutcher.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 10:26, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Sonsofbutcher.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Sonsofbutcher.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:27, 29 May 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 10:27, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:88songep.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:88songep.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:55, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Anothersplitep.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Anothersplitep.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:58, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Defendersofthehate.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Defendersofthehate.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:59, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:5643songep(alt-1).jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:5643songep(alt-1).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 12:36, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of What's Wrong with Bill?

The article What's Wrong with Bill? has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yappy2bhere (talk) 05:06, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WhatsWrongWithBill.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WhatsWrongWithBill.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:42, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Galleryofsuicide-alt.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Galleryofsuicide-alt.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 06:39, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:5643songep.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:5643songep.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 03:57, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Six-Shooter (Puppet Master)

The article Six-Shooter (Puppet Master) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a non-notable "character" from a B-horror film.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JoelWhy? talk 20:58, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel Lamb

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Daniel Lamb, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of https://www.linkedin.com/in/daniellamb#recommendations. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Atlantic306 (talk) 03:56, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sexy Sluts: Been There, Done That

The article Sexy Sluts: Been There, Done That has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 06:16, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sexy Sluts- Been There, Done That.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sexy Sluts- Been There, Done That.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:57, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Necro (EP) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Necro (EP) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Necro (EP) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 02:44, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of I Need Drugs (song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article I Need Drugs (song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Need Drugs (song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 16:42, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TheMostSadistic.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheMostSadistic.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NoMoreHeroesOriginalSoundTracks.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NoMoreHeroesOriginalSoundTracks.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NoMoreHeroesSoundTracksDarkSide.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NoMoreHeroesSoundTracksDarkSide.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of God Is an Atheist for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article God Is an Atheist is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/God Is an Atheist until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 04:20, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Inhuman Conditions

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Inhuman Conditions requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 05:46, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rare Demos and Freestyles Volume 1 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rare Demos and Freestyles Volume 1 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rare Demos and Freestyles Volume 1 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 02:03, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Zan (Dir en Gray album) coverart.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Zan (Dir en Gray album) coverart.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bury You with Satan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bury You with Satan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bury You with Satan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 23:32, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Necro Gory Days special edition cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Necro Gory Days special edition cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Necro - I Need Drugs.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Necro - I Need Drugs.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Necro I Need Drugs censored edition cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Necro I Need Drugs censored edition cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Necro Gory Days instrumentals cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Necro Gory Days instrumentals cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Prefixdeath instrumentals.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Prefixdeath instrumentals.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SexorcistSpecialEdition.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SexorcistSpecialEdition.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Selectedscenesfromtheendoftheworld.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Selectedscenesfromtheendoftheworld.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GodIsAnAtheist.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GodIsAnAtheist.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Violent Acts of Beauty.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Violent Acts of Beauty.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BuryYouWithSatan.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BuryYouWithSatan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:NotBeingWindstorm.jpg

The file File:NotBeingWindstorm.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cannibalcorpsedemo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cannibalcorpsedemo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:InstrumentalsVol.1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:InstrumentalsVol.1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Necro (rapper) songs

A tag has been placed on Category:Necro (rapper) songs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:02, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Sexart proposed

Proposed deletion of Sexart

The article Sexart has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable, should be a mere footnote in Korn's wiki page. nothing supports the amount of detail on this page of a non-notable act

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 142.197.118.57 (talk) 02:03, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:NotBeingWindstorm.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NotBeingWindstorm.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 10:36, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Red Kings" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Red Kings and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 30 § Red Kings until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jay 💬 17:52, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"The Red Kings" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect The Red Kings and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 30 § The Red Kings until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jay 💬 17:53, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Project Militia" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Project Militia and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 30 § Project Militia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jay 💬 17:53, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"The Project Militia" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect The Project Militia and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 30 § The Project Militia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jay 💬 17:54, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Dr. Pickman" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Dr. Pickman and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 30 § Dr. Pickman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jay 💬 18:00, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Judy Sender" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Judy Sender and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 30 § Judy Sender until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jay 💬 18:00, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"The Bloodhounds" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect The Bloodhounds and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 30 § The Bloodhounds until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jay 💬 18:01, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Insane Clown Posse - Tunnel Of Love-XXX-cover.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Insane Clown Posse - Tunnel Of Love-XXX-cover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The bleeding-alt.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The bleeding-alt.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]