User talk:Rschen7754/Archive 5

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

→

Archive 10

I-94 Interchanges

User: Appraiser created this article on 7 December 2006 with the hopes of consolidating space on the main I-94 article. I took the liberty of moving the detail to individual state pages:

Interstate 94 in Montana Interstate 94 in North Dakota Interstate 94 in Minnesota Interstate 94 in Wisconsin Interstate 94 in Illinois Interstate 94 in Indiana Interstate 94 in Michigan

thus the interchange page is not necessary and IMHO should be deleted. I can notify Appraiser of such if necessary, but I wanted to get an opinion of a more experienced editor as well. (Not to say Appraiser isn't experienced? I don't know)

Since it was only linked to I-94, There wouldn't be a reason to bring it up to debate first IMHO.

Could you get back to me at your earliest convience - and I hope you had a good vacation. • master_son^{Lets talk} 03:36, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

I support your actions. You can probably {{prod}} it. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 02:41, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

A copyvio problem

Hey Rschen. A user, 512theking, has been uploading pictures stolen from state-ends.com and releasing them into the public domain as their author, which is most certainly not the case. I would not bring this up here except for the fact that this user is the same one as Albertotineo10 and Kingofpitching10, the former of which committed the same copyright violations. What should be done? --TMF ^{Let's Go Mets - Stats} 06:24, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

How do we know this? Has a checkuser been done? --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 06:25, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

No, but I believe that this edit is implicating enough. The target of the two users' contributions (PA-related articles) are almost identical as well. --TMF ^{Let's Go Mets - Stats} 06:28, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

That is a bit suspicious. And how Albertotineo10 suddenly gave up and left? The problem is what to do, however... I'll consider blocks but this may need to be taken to a higher level. I'd say take this to ANI and see what they say. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 06:36, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Agreed. That seems like the best approach at this point. --TMF ^{Let's Go Mets - Stats} 06:37, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Yeah... present all the evidence and see what they say. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 06:39, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Infobox standards

I did out of curiosity a study of the current infoboxes on all of the routes and found the following: 5 states use boxes that are not in any way tied to infobox road - meaning that they were independently built. Illinois Kentucky Maryland Minnesota Oklahoma 8 States more than likely don't use any infoboxes (not a big deal to me though) Arizona Arkansas Idaho (no routes exist) Mississippi Montana New Mexico Oregon South Dakota All of the rest (including several states that have their own boxes - which are partly filled Infobox roads) use Infobox road. The concern I have with a state or two: Minnesota has all shields made in .png format - Do we still have to make svg's? could we just set up the infobox and browse boxes to match the PNGs? The current infobox is present on each route - it mirrors Missouri's box - so conversion should be easy without compromising (in the sandbox first of course :) ) Illinois is a good example of a state that has all articles completed with what I believe their infobox - I would not dare touch that without notifying LpAngelRob or another Illinois SR WikiProject member since that's basically doing things all over again. Anyhow - That's my two (hundred) cents. I brought this up since all of the browse boxes comply with WP:USRD now but if I tried to use it in certain places - problems may arise. Thanks in advance. • master_sonLets talk 00:41, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

User:TwinsMetsFan has been working on this at User:TwinsMetsFan/browse for a while... with regards to Illinois I would say offer them the chance to change their infobox (maybe it can be converted without changing too much?) but don't force them. Shields are supposed to be SVG though so MN does have to switch over... but ask shields subdepartment to make sure. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 00:55, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Oklahoma could be converted with minimal effort, I've left a note on their WP page. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 01:05, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

not to worry - I'm not going to press the issue with them right now unless TMF or you would like me to. I'm trying to get a hold of Sable232 since he has done some already. Then kill two birds with one stone - converting the infobox -which should go easy since it's essentially a carbon of Missouri's. • master_son^{Lets talk} 02:25, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Assessment

I can take care of the New Hampshire articles; I've been cleaning them up to WP:NHSH standards as I go down the unassessed list. --TMF ^{Let's Go Mets - Stats} 22:47, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, I appreciate the work... I'm trying to balance not overloading the category yet still getting all the articles assessed (I estimate there's at least 1-2K that need to be assessed that aren't in the category yet.) --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 23:03, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for tagging all of the WV articles. I can handle these as well - all of them need massive cleanup before they get assessed. --TMF ^{Let's Go Mets - Stats} 08:52, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Unused highway

Now sourced from a bajillion different sources -- Unused highway. Does this satisfy user:B.Wind's criteria? Is there a way to condense the references or put the code somewhere else? The page looks VERY jargled. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 05:39, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

NYSR-NYCR Newsletter - Issue 2

The New York State and County Route WikiProjects Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 2	15 January 2007	About the Newsletter
Departments: Features: Project News Status of 531 extension updated Member News Plans for improvements to 104 to be unveiled From the Editor Routes 5 and 20 to receive upgrades
Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line Shortcut : WP:NYSR/N

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. --TMF ^{Let's Go Mets - Stats} 22:33, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:TemplateName

Template:TemplateName has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. --• master_son^{Lets talk} 05:41, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

UT SR Page question

Hey. I recently added an infobox on the Utah State Route 68 page. Everything is well, except the image of the SR-68 shield doesn't show up. Instead, the normal gray background just stays there. Can you check the page to see if you have the same problem? Thanks -   •The RSJ•   Talk | Sign Here 04:10, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

the thumbnail program still has bugs - if you follow the image into wikiCommons - then tack on "?action=purge" to the end of the url, it will refresh the thumbnail. I just did that and it shows up now. • master_son^{Lets talk} 00:36, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Cool. :) --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 02:55, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, it works now. Woohoo :D   •The RSJ•   Talk | Sign Here 22:45, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

How Come?

How come you and that TMF guy talking about me stealing images. Listen i did you guys a great favor on a lot of Pennsylvania Highways that need help if you guys want to block me, be my guest. But next time say it in my talk page instead of talking to one of your friends about it first. What is this the Wiki:Police, don't make me laugh i'm leaving and never doing this again and by the way, i'm not albertotineo10 or the other guy. -- The King is done (512theking)

Additional info

Just to let you know, User:512theking told User:Prisonbreak91 to pick up where he left off. Also, if you check 512theking's page, it says that 512theking quit and never coming back. This was just a heads-up if you didn't look yet. V60 ^{VTalk - VDemolitions} 05:26, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

OK, WOW! Looks like we have a sockpuppet amongst our pages from the looks of it involving the users you mentioned in this section and in the Copyvio problem section above (obviously) And for sure - it looks like User:Prisonbreak91 is also User:512theking - (the former is the one that put this section in your page. :-Z. Why - and how - did he sign with the latter's name instead?) Are you guys having their IPs checked if possible to see where they're contributing from? • master_son^{Lets talk} 03:55, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

We have to run a checkuser for that- I'm waiting to see what WP:ANI (if they care?) says. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 04:00, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Checkuser...and possibly a block on both... V60 ^{VTalk - VDemolitions} 04:15, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Update: I have yet identified two possible socks. 172.146.169.214 added "Can someone help me create road maps" (look here) and contributed to PA Route articles. 209.244.30.249 has added the "I QUIT AND NEVER COMING BACK!" line (look here) and also contributed to PA Route articles. Just a little bit more research on the page history. V60 ^{VTalk - VDemolitions} 04:27, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

I noticed all of those two - but didn't think about that. The guys were using the MTF Talk template on their pages as well. • master_son^{Lets talk} 05:02, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Oh - and even though he says leave Prisonbreak91 out of it, that user is as guilty as the rest of them IMHO • master_son^{Lets talk} 02:27, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Rschen, block the users below NOW! You're the admin; you should do something about it (I hope what 512theking10 said was true)! V60 ^{VTalk - VDemolitions} 01:11, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Agreed fully - I got one of these vandal edits myself - [1] • master_son^{Lets talk} 02:26, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

My thanks to everyone for taking care of this issue. I've been busy lately, so I haven't been able to edit/monitor that much. Glad to see this is finally being resolved. --TMF ^{Let's Go Mets - Stats} 04:17, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Blocks

Effective immediately, I am blocking the following users and IPs for abusive sockpuppetry, trolling, image copyright violations, MOS problems, etc. With the exception of Prisonbreak10 and the IPs, all will be blocked indefinitely. The ones not blocked indefinitely will be blocked for 48 hours. However, with any further violations, the aforementioned accounts and any socks will be blocked indefinitely on sight. Let this serve as a final warning to the person behind all of these accounts:

• User:Prisonbreak91
• User:512theking
• User:512theking10
• 209.244.30.249
• 172.146.169.214
• User:Kingofpitching10
• user:Albertotineo10

If anyone has concerns regarding these blocks, please contact me on my talk page. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 04:05, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Rschen, I just removed trolling from the 209... IP. He just said that he'll create another account and vandalize more. So just as a precautionary measure, block his IP from creating accounts (and of course editing pages). V60 ^{VTalk - VDemolitions} 23:04, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Actually the IP is 209.244.30.229. Now block him indefinitely from creating accounts and editing pages. V60 ^{VTalk - VDemolitions} 23:07, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

According to the blocking policy, "Indefinite blocks should not be used on IPs; many IPs are dynamically assigned and change frequently from one person to the next, and even static IP addresses are re-assigned or have different users." Also, do we know that the recent ones are the same person? It could just be someone familiar with the case and wanting to stir up trouble. If you want to do a longer-term block on the IP, you should probably ask on requests for checkuser to ensure that they are the same person. --NE2 23:21, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Agreed, but I don't think there's much doubt that these IPs are the same person as the users listed above. See their contributions for evidence. I'm not saying that a checkuser isn't needed - I'm just saying it's extremely likely that a checkuser would come up positive. --TMF ^{Let's Go Mets - Stats} 23:28, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Specifically, it's not clear to me that 512theking10 is the same as the other people. It's certainly likely, but could be a troll stirring stuff up. --NE2 23:41, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

What other actions are available to deal with IPs? It seems that would be very difficult to block one because it's variable • master_son^{Lets talk} 23:57, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Blocked Special:Contributions/209.244.30.229 for one week. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 02:32, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Blocked Prisonbreak91 and other IPs for a week as well. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 02:36, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Could this IP be a sock as well? Special:Contributions/163.238.61.156 --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 02:41, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Not again... User:Pahighways. Vandalized my page. Blocked 1 week. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 02:54, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

What was I thinking? Reblocked indef. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 03:05, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

User:Pahighways is a blatant vandal, modeled after Jeff Kitsko's PAHighways. Jeff uses the nickname online, such as on IRC, and this is not the same user (verified through direct communition with him tonight). As such, this user needs to be blocked ASAP; CheckUser first would be nice. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 03:40, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

He was already blocked. I'm thinking of filing for a checkuser to see if there's more... looking into it now. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 03:42, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

All the user contributions (images) are copyright vios. I am tagging them right now, but this is getting out-of-hand. More action may be necessary in the future. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 03:43, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

And now the copyright vios are being posted on Commons -- [2]. Can these be speedy deleted? Seicer (talk) (contribs) 03:46, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

I tagged it there (I'm not an admin at Commons). --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 03:58, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Also found Image:I-81 va exit 3.jpg, Image:I-81 s near I-64.jpg, Image:I-081 sb exit 300 03.jpg at commons. They're probably here too. `Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 04:00, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Discussion has been moved to WP:ANI. Please only leave urgent messages here.

Copyright vios

I took care of the copyright violations you posted about on WP:ANI. The user is clearly a sockpuppet of the earlier user, so you might want to take administrative actions. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 18:45, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

3di2

this template was added to WP:TFD thought I'd let you know - I just discovered that this morning • master_son^{Lets talk} 13:35, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

I added it to Deletion Debates also • master_son^{Lets talk} 13:36, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

The I-95 in DC theory

Hey Rschen. I think this goes right along with the I-95 in DC theory. Your thoughts are appreciated. --TMF ^{Let's Go Mets - Stats} 17:46, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

FYI

Wikipedia talk:Block log#Block? What is a sock? Hesperian 03:03, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation, but I wasn't asking for one; I trust you. I just wanted to draw your attention to that message. Hesperian 03:09, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism

Yeah, it sure is. Speaking of which, a vandal not related to ours vandalised my user page yesterday. Isn't that nice? V60 ^{VTalk - VDemolitions} 23:17, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

User talk page vandalism

[3] and [4]. Pretty intimidating. V60 ^{VTalk - VDemolitions} 04:00, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Just a thought - I joined the CVU after our last barrage and haven't been touched since ;) • master_son^{Lets talk} 14:29, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Pennsylvania Route 43

TMF and I are trying to fend off a violation of WP:NOR and possibly WP:VERIFY by an anon editor. The trouble is, that editor claims that he/she has been on the road frequently, but I said repeatedly that reliable sources are the content that can be on Wikipedia, and that original research is prohibited at all times. Since you are the "resident admin for WP:USRD", and tell him/her that original research is unacceptable, that would be great. V60 ^{VTalk - VDemolitions} 00:46, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

User:JohnDoe15

Could you please unblock that user? It appears that he is not a vandal, although he is using the same IP as our's. Plus, by me saying those, it implies that he is not a sock of our vandal, either. It's just an AOL proxy that's confusing us. V60 ^{VTalk - VDemolitions} 03:01, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

That link really doesn't imply anything meaningful. If you can, please check the IP's talk page. The AOL proxy probably had a glitch and made that user and 512theking have the same IP. V60 ^{VTalk - VDemolitions} 03:33, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

True, this could be disputed. WP:RFCU won't do anything, but what will? V60 ^{VTalk - VDemolitions} 03:39, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

New user: User:JohnnyAlbert10. Don't block him, though, since I told him to actually contribute, not vandalize. Give him an hour to not vandalize, then make the decision to block or not. V60 ^{VTalk - VDemolitions} 01:51, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

!

CELEBRATE!!! 512hteking is GROUNDED! V60 ^{VTalk - VDemolitions} 02:13, 5 February 2007 (UTC)—I am usually not this crazy, but the vandalism problem @ USRD is over!!!

Uh...

Please don't block the new user. He will learn how to edit very well, just like I did in the early days of me contributing. This applies even though the new user's brother is the real vandal. V60 ^{VTalk - VDemolitions} 20:19, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

The Prisonbreak91 thing is because the vandal forgot to log out and so JohnnyAlbert did PA 897. V60 ^{VTalk · VDemolitions} 22:48, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

WP:NJSCR Newsletter 2

The New Jersey State and County Route Newsletter Issue 2 – February 2007

Issue #2 The second issue of the WP:NJSCR newsletter celebrates the promotion of Interstate 295 (Delaware-New Jersey) to good article status, as well as changes to the project on the county routes side.

Project News Interstate 295 (Delaware-New Jersey) was upgraded to good article status. Thanks to everyone who helped out with the good article review, and the discussions on WT:IH and elsewhere. Northenglish and EaglesFanInTampa have undertaken a project to put infoboxes on all NJSCR articles. In addition, the County routes in New Jersey article has been split into lists by county, and the infobox format for county routes has changed slightly. For all non-500-series county routes, the state is NJ County_name, and the type is blank. Infoboxes are set up for the following counties: Sussex, Ocean, Mercer, Cumberland, Bergen, Middlesex, Atlantic, and Monmouth. The following counties have a full set of shield SVGs: Middlesex, Monmouth, Ocean, and Sussex If you need help -- such as an infobox for another county, or more shield images -- don't hesitate to let Northenglish know. If you create an infobox that doesn't work properly (lots of redlinks), enclose it in an HTML comment (<!-- -->), and we'll get it working ASAP. Member of the Month The member of the month is EaglesFanInTampa, for his tireless work adding infoboxes to the 500-series county routes.

08:23, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Highways

Ah, that would be several months ago. There were several proposals and polls, as well as an arbitration case about it. I believe it's not really in dispute any more, that page is rather outdated. >Radiant< 08:23, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

"One-way" Highway question

U.S. Route 7 Alternate, is a southbound-only road. Does the normal convention of listing roads south to north apply to this type of road? (The road is listed south to north in the VT route log.)

TIA, SkipperRipper 05:17, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Not sure on that one. I would bring it to the VTSH talk page or the USRD talk page. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 05:21, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks (and done), SkipperRipper 18:21, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

U.S. Roads Newsletter Issue #1

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 1	10 February 2007	About the Newsletter
Departments: Features: Project News Notability of state highways is challenged Important deletion debates Featured subproject Featured member From the editor
Archives  |  Newsroom   Shortcut : WP:USRD/N

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 20:45, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

The great highway deletion debates

has anyone ever noticed something about the experience of these users who are putting up the AfDs like User:Inkpaduta. Who are they to come in do this? Many of them have hardly been here long enough. • master_son^{Lets talk} 16:03, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Injustice of course. We get people not from WP:USRD telling us what to do. But eventually ... well all the problems we've had with that have gone our way, except for stubs. Those editors won't budge. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 01:43, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi. In relation to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minnesota State Highway 127, doing "random article patrol" is a housekeeping project to find unsourced stubby articles, vanity articles, hoaxes, nonsense articles, and commerical spam articles. I click on a "Random article" and sometimes find an article which needs sources. If it is a stub and it looks like sources cannot be found to make it more than a stub, I may nominate it for deletion. I looked it up in Google, I studied iits satellite image and map at Google map, and I could not see how it could ever make an encyclopedia article on its own. Random article patrol means I may nominate a Polish rap group, then a porn actor, then a short piece of highway. I am sorry if I got ego involved in this one AFD, because the intention is just to have all the articles be well sourced non-stubs and which have evidence of notability. Was this Minnesta highway AFD mentioned on a project page or noticeboard? It seemed like several editors came trooping in to say "all roads are notable." References of a map and being on a bid list satisfy the WP:RS and WP:V issues, but there are lots of things which exist without belonging in an encyclopedia. And there is the question of where you draw the line: if any tiny piece of the state road system is notable, (some of the sections are pretty short and there does not seem to be much you could say about them) what about county roads and city streets? Some of these stubs would do better is a list which collected them than in individual articles. On the project page Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Highways I see discussion of merging extremely short sections, and that still seems like a good idea, just because there is not much to be said in the article. Regards. Now I'll just wander on down the road to another random article. Inkpaduta 20:02, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Please read the instructions at the top of the page and put new posts at the bottom, because I didn't notice this post the first few times around. It is fair game to inform other editors about such deletion. Per consensus, state highways are notable, whether you agree or not. One of the major philosophies on Wikipedia is going along with consensus and yielding to it, whether you agree with it or not.. As I see you have been here only a week, I would strongly advise that you learn this early on, for you will most definitely run into situations like this again. County roads have been deemed notable, but streets have not, except for famous streets in places like Manhattan.

Another point to mention is that if you don't believe highways are notable, then you take it to a place like WT:USRD. You don't start nominating articles for deletion. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 00:09, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

User:64.90.95.53

I see I'm not the only one having issues with this editor. I've had to clean up after him on several occasions (as you may see on his talk page :) • master_son^{Lets talk} 03:43, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, that's why I decided to block. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 03:49, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Kudos from me, too. The only reason I requested semi-protection for I-90 is because I couldn't think of anything else. You certainly took care of it. -- NORTH ^talk 22:18, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

The newsletter...

Please unsubscribe me from the road project newsletter. Cheers. youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 13:15, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Done. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 00:09, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

This is a automated to all bot operators

Please take a few moments and fill in the data for your bot on Wikipedia:Bots/Status Thank you Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 19:46, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Dumb internet connection... I'll take care of it at home. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 00:09, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Florida State Road 500A

You know about highways. Are there sources which could be added to this to make it a better article? Sould it be merged? With what? I found it in random article patrol, but don't want to just jump in to the AFD thing on a stub of a road article again so soon. Regards. Inkpaduta 21:02, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Notify WT:FLSH, or wait and eventually someone will add to it. I can routebox it when i get home (I'm currently using a display computer at Circuit City.) --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 23:55, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

My bad

Opps, my mistake i though the edit summary was optional. Okay i'll provide a summary. -- JohnnyAlbert 13:25, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Not a problem, I frequently forget. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 23:53, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Quick speedy

Could you delete Image:Pennsylvania Turnpike logo.svg? The {{db}} is already there. Thanks!  V60 ^{VTalk · VDemolitions} 00:11, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Done... it's properly licensed at commons? I thought it was fair use. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 00:19, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

It was fair use, but is ineligible for copyright.  V60 ^{VTalk · VDemolitions} 00:29, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

NYSR-NYCR Newsletter - Issue 3

The New York State and County Route WikiProjects Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 3	15 February 2007	About the Newsletter
Departments: Features: Project News Newest state route to go airborne Member News Tappan Zee study progress to be released From the Editor Route 12B to receive safety upgrades Special introduction
Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line Shortcut : WP:NYSR/N

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. --TMF ^{Let's Go Mets - Stats} 06:13, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Importance scale

See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Assessment#Importance scale. Thanks! —Scott5114↗ 20:07, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

You helped choose Ridge Route as this week's WP:USRD/AID winner

Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 05:28, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Hey Rschen7754

Hi, i'm wondering what happened to all my brother's user pages:User:512theking, User:512theking10, User:Kingofpitching10, User:Prisonbreak91, and other ones. My brother is in juvy becuase he stole a car so he can't vandalize wikipedia but i'm still wondering what will happen to all of his pages? Aren't those useless pages taking up usefull space in wikipedia? Please respond on my talk page if you want to. -- JohnnyAlbert10 ^{Time to talk · My Help} 16:47, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

I'll remember to do that but I'm a bit quick with things. I've been really busy so when I edit an article I just save it. But you're right that's no excuse why I shouldn't be using the preview button. -- JohnnyAlbert10 ^{Time to talk · My Help} 21:10, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

The current U.S. Roads Article Improvement Drive articles are
Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Article Improvement Drive/current (improvement) and Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Article Improvement Drive/currentstub (expansion).
Last week's collaborations were: Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Article Improvement Drive/old and Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Article Improvement Drive/oldstub.
CAST YOUR VOTE for next week's article

--Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 03:13, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism by User:68.127.37.6

The recent edits by 68.127.37.6 on Interstate 630 have been rather disruptive and, as I see it, vandalism. I wouldn't have thought much of it the first time (detailed below) as I assumed a good-faith edit gone bad, but as of this second time, and after reading his talk page, I'm concerned and feel that action should be taken. Your thoughts? For all intensive purposes, I've copied this to User:Ryanpostlethwaite. First occurance Second occurance Cheers, --MPD ^{T / C} 04:02, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Automated message to bot owners

As a result of discussion on the village pump and mailing list, bots are now allowed to edit up to 15 times per minute. The following is the new text regarding bot edit rates from Wikipedia:Bot Policy:

Until new bots are accepted they should wait 30-60 seconds between edits, so as to not clog the recent changes list and user watchlists. After being accepted and a bureaucrat has marked them as a bot, they can edit at a much faster pace. Bots doing non-urgent tasks should edit approximately once every ten seconds, while bots who would benefit from faster editing may edit approximately once every every four seconds.

Also, to eliminate the need to spam the bot talk pages, please add Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard to your watchlist. Future messages which affect bot owners will be posted there. Thank you. --Mets501 04:52, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Raccoon-Fox

I'm here. Still will be. Just watch Highway 401 to see if it's me. RingtailedFox • Talk • Stalk 23:05, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Mnclink

Template:Mnclink has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. --• master_son^{Lets talk} 18:23, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Mnclist

Template:Mnclist has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. --• master_son^{Lets talk} 18:23, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Help

Please Rschen, some one has vandalized my talk page. -- JohnnyAlbert10 ^{Time to talk · My Help} 14:13, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

I fixed my talk page, but block the user responsible. -- JohnnyAlbert10 ^{Time to talk · My Help} 14:29, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

U.S. Roads Newsletter Issue #2

File:New Jersey blank.svg The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 2	24 February 2007	About the Newsletter
Departments: Features: Project News Notability of state highways is upheld Deletion debates Kansas Turnpike is now a Good Article Featured subproject U.S. Roads IRC channel created Featured member Infoboxes and Navigation subproject started From the editors
Archives  |  Newsroom   Shortcut : WP:USRD/NEWS

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

Apologies for the late delivery. Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 05:13, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Another AFD

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhode Island Route 11!!! It's sort of urgent, so please get onto IRC ASAP!  V60 ^{VTalk · VDemolitions · Editor review 2!} 00:45, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Recent articles for deletion

I have solicited a response to recent listings at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion on the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard. You are invited to come participate. --Iamunknown 05:05, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

You helped choose U.S. Route 20 as this week's WP:USRD/AID winner

--Holderca1 16:07, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

ELG

User:MPD01605/Roads/Work#Exit_list_guide_examples Go there and see if you like it. Thanks, --MPD ^{T / C} 00:49, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Concurrencies need to be multi-column; otherwise they';re too hard to see. Exit numbers don't really need to be in bold. Otherwise, I have no problems. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 00:55, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

They're definitely harder to see than a multi-column row. Whether or not they're too hard I suppose depends on personal opinion – how important one thinks the concurrencies are. In other words how important is the I-81/VA 100 concurrency that it needs a multi-column row to bring attention to it? -- NORTH ^talk 01:05, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

I personally believe they are very important: for example, what about those looking for a VA 100 exit list? sure hard to find if there's no multi-column list... --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 01:06, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

That should be on the Virginia Route 100 article. -- NORTH ^talk 01:10, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Unfortunately, that won't necessarily happen immediately, and besides, that information is harder to find with concurrencies in notes column. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 01:12, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Collateral damage

Just to tell you, there was a bit of unintentional collateral damage from your recent block of User:512theking. It would be awesome if you could take care of it. Thanks! Gracenotes^T § 05:21, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for unblocking me, i'm really sorry that my brother vandalizd your pages he told me after he came home from juvy. I'm sorry, i'm the one to blame for this becuase I should have taken care of him a long time ago. I told him if he ever edits any wikipedia article ever again, i'll tell my parents that time he skipped school 7 times, he'll be for grounded like 5 months. -- JohnnyAlbert10 ^{Time to talk · My Help} 12:25, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Specifically, this edit was conducted: [5] Per latest consensus at the U.S. Roads WikiProject, all of these socks have been blocked indef. on sight. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 20:20, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

If i see him on wikipedia with another account. I'll tell you ahead of time, OK? -- JohnnyAlbert10 ^{Time to talk · My Help} 15:23, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Anything even remotely similar to 512theking will get blocked. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 20:28, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Possibly if he uses 512theking in the name? --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 20:47, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

I tried my skipping school threat, and he don't care. But how will you know if that's him, he could be using a new name. I'll just look in his computer's history then notifying you.

Hey, could you take a good look at Pennsylvania Route 65 and tell me what else the article needs to improve. I could use some help as well. -- JohnnyAlbert10 ^{Time to talk · My Help} 15:32, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

More formal tone could be used. Beyond that, I am not sure (I am not from the East Coast and do not know much about PA highways). --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 20:47, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Ohh yeah you're from California, my bad. But i'll work on this route, thank you. -- JohnnyAlbert10 ^{Time to talk · My Help} 15:51, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Hey's Back

Hey Rschen, my brother vandalied my talk page two times good thing a had a copy of it on Microsoft Word. Lookout, he's User:Phillies 5000. -- JohnnyAlbert10 ^{Time to talk · My Help} 14:51, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for reverting vandalism on my userpage! Royalbroil ^T : C 12:51, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

About my rating for the WP:CAL

Hello, I am a member of the WP:CAL. The routes you have rated are on my Watchlist. I have contributed to them and have rated for our project. I would like to rate higher than B, Low but have guidance on this from a respected proect member on ratings. On articles of great importance to our project, I have rated up to B, Mid. This one should be that but not when stacked up against some of our other projects. Hope this helps. BTW, I added to U.S. Route 40 a source that gives great descriptions on our state routes/interstates Interstate 40. If you look at the top of the page, there is a box to type in a route number ala 68 which talks about our California State Route 68. Lots of great info. Ronbo76 03:42, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

WP:USRD/A rating is separate from any WP:CAL rating. If this does not answer your question, please clarify. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 03:44, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

USRD Newsletter - Issue 3

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 3	10 March 2007	About the Newsletter
Departments: Features: Project news Inactivity? Deletion debates Article Improvement Drive Featured subproject Good and Featured Articles Featured member From the editors
Archives  |  Newsroom   Shortcut : WP:USRD/NEWS

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

Active user verification

Hello, Rschen7754. Due to the high number of inactive users at WP:USRD, we are asking that you verify that you are still an active contributor of the project. To do so, please add an asterisk (*) after your name on Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Newsletter/List. Users without one by the next issue in 2 weeks will be removed off the list and off the respective road projects as well. If you have any questions, please contact me on my talk page. Thanks. Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 22:55, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Request Block

In regards to IP user 209.244.30.249, on 19 January 2007 you said

with any further violations, the aforementioned accounts and any socks will be blocked indefinitely on sight. Let this serve as a final warning to the person behind all of these accounts.

IP 209.244.30.249 has been used to repeatedly vandalize the Michael Corcoran article.

I beleive these IP's/accounts to be sock puppets of the same individual:

69.139.11.105
69.248.239.218
130.91.93.33
Watchmike

I ask you to follow through and block this IP and the related sock puppets indefinitely. Thanks Windyjarhead 04:03, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

This needs to be taken to WP:AN subpage, this appears to be a different vandal than the one that was blocked above. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 04:39, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

You helped choose Nevada State Route 401 as this week's WP:USRD/AID winner

Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 04:45, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Newsletter

Hey dude can I start getting the newsletter? JohnnyBGood t c VIVA! 20:21, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Hmm you're not on the list? You can go to Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Newsletter/List to sign up. (If you're not a member of a highway WP you might have been missed.) --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 21:46, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Request for bot approval

Hi. I don't know what bot something with your request for bot approval went wrong. You linked to a request that doesn't exist. Maybe a typo? — Ocolon 06:42, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

I linked to Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Rschen7754. How embarassing. :) --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 21:53, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism

Hey Rschen, can you please block King of fools23 because he blanked Pennsylvania Route 145 about 3 or 4 times. Thanks. -- JohnnyAlbert10 ^{Time to talk · My Help} 16:00, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Done. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 20:03, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Watch out, look at this. He just doesn't quit, Block him. -- -- J-A10 ^{T · C} 23:57, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

WP:RFBOT

Your recent bot approvals request has been Approved for Task Trial. Please see the request page for details. — xaosflux ^Talk 04:36, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Your usertalk page

I've unprotected your usertalk page, as it has been protected against "trolling" for ~2 months. Having your talk page accesible is important when you are running new bot trials. If you have more trolling issues please let me know. — xaosflux ^Talk 04:36, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

uw-roads

Just so you know, I've renamed Template:uw-roads1 and Template:uw-roads2 to Template:usrd1 and Template:usrd2, as the uw- space is for user warnings, where these are notices from a Wikiproject. --TeckWiz 13:35, 24 March 2007

Inactive

Yes, I am now transitioning out of the WP roads projects. Thank you for the confirmation. Jgcarter 21:08, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Inactive at WP:USR

I've just got a notification from you saying I've been inactive from the US. State Roads related WikiProjects. This is a large error, as I'm thinking about modifying some project guidelines to blend in with the MOS. --w^{L<speak·check>} 21:18, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for the notification, your name will be replaced into the active users list. Apologies for that. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 21:22, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

USRD Newsletter - Issue 4

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 4	24 March 2007	About the Newsletter
Departments: Features: Project news March 16 IRC Meeting Deletion debates Kentucky and Utah projects demoted Featured subproject A quick look at the structural integrity of state highway WikiProjects Featured member From the editors
Archives  |  Newsroom   Shortcut : WP:USRD/NEWS

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. — --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 22:21, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

WP:KYSH

I'll get right on this to improve the project. I've been editing so many other articles lately I've put it on the backburner, but the pages really do need attention. I'll also update WP:KYSH with the new infobox road template as well. Thanks for bringing it to my attention via the newsletter! Seicer (talk) (contribs) 01:32, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

RE:U.S. Roads Project Inactivy

This is clearly and mistake, I thought you were talking about helping with the newsletter, not recieving it. - Patricknoddy^{TALK (reply here)|HISTORY} 10:44, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

I'd like to clarify it, I've been "removed" from U.S. roads wikiprojects, and this is a error. - Patricknoddy^{TALK (reply here)|HISTORY} 11:01, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Ditto. ¿ςפקιДИτς! ☺ ☻ 17:31, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Both restored. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 19:25, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. - Patricknoddy^{TALK (reply here)|HISTORY} 18:44, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Highways

The arbitration committee has voted to lift your probation in the above entitled arbitration case. For the arbitration committee, Thatcher131 12:49, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Need improving

I need a favor, i'm too busy on WPTC to get around to the Canada Roads projects, any chance you could help?Mitchazenia 22:39, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Possibly me or TMF... however, I have a huge backlog in the U.S. and am not sure I can get to Canada. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 21:49, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:CA118.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:CA118.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigrTex 20:28, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

WP:NJSCR Newsletter #3

The New Jersey State and County Route Newsletter Issue 3 – March 2007

Issue #3 The third issue of the WP:NJSCR newsletter celebrates the completion of infoboxes for all current state routes. Congratulations team!

Project News All current state routes now have an infobox. Route 183 was selected to represent the project in the header as the last article to receive one. Now that we have that done, what's left? Plenty! A to-do list has been posted on the project page, with a more detailed version at WT:NJSCR#To-do list. The simple version: Ensure that all freeway exit lists are up to exit list guide standards. Make sure all infoboxes have the new maint= parameter. Make sure the straight line diagram is properly referenced in the infobox. Add a major intersections table to each article. Member of the Month The member of the month is Alansohn, who had the fantastic idea for a "final run-through" and the to-do list.

Want to help on the next newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it transcluded next time? – It's all here. -- NORTH ^talk 21:00, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Don't remove me!

I'm still active! Thanks! Milktaco 04:15, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

You've been readded to the list. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 04:37, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Minnesota Highway Shields

I got this notice when I started applying the current shields. I might need someone to back me up on this.

I noticed you've been replacing the historic shields with the modern blue ones. This can't happen. It's misleading to put the modern shield on an article when the highway was decommissioned long before that style was used. In that case I see it as better to have no shield at all than an incorrect one, but I still don't see what the problem with mine is. --Sable232 14:10, 28 March 2007 (UTC) (on my talk page)

-- master_son^{Talk - Edits} 18:07, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

actually I would like to discuss this (IRC?) tonight if possible... -- master_son^{Talk - Edits} 18:18, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Usrd1

Template:Usrd1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — --TeckWiz ^ParlateContribs_@ 22:26, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 04:41, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

How about no, old junction lists dont get signed. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 04:45, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Automation has its limits I suppose. ;-) -- NORTH ^talk 05:09, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Interstate 238

Your input would be appreciated at Talk:Interstate 238. A debate has developed about 238's status as a child or non-child of I-80. User:Chriscf is claiming it is a child of 80 while I'm claiming it is not as we've been treating it from day one. I've found no evidence for his position but at least 3 different instances of support for mine from fairly reliable sources one of which is linked to from the Caltrans page. Gateman1997 08:26, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

He's striking out your comments again. Gateman1997 21:29, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Also yes I'm still active, as evidence by me engaging in the I 238 debate. I just didn't want to get the newsletter. I usually come read where it's located directly. Gateman1997 21:33, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Talk page warnings - WP:POINT

Please do not place frivolous warnings on the talk pages of other users, and assume good faith of your fellow contributors. Chris cheese whine 21:43, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Rschen7754bot

I have already completed a trial, and this was clearly noted on the request page. Furthermore, I asked for two other tasks to be approved. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 21:56, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, is this is response to something? I don't remember :-) —METS501 (talk) 22:01, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

This was in response to your archiving of my bot request today. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 22:02, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Oh, sorry. It wasn't archiving, don't worry, just moving into the "Bots in a trial period" section for sorting purposes. It will be dealt with soon. —METS501 (talk) 22:06, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

The problem is, there is a huge backload of tasks at USRD that need to get approved that were waiting on that archived request. Such as the delivery of newsletters that are delivered tomorrow.

Quite frankly, the level of bureaucracy at BRFA is disturbing and frustrating, especially for a bot that has been approved by the old bot group and has a bot flag. It can be stated that it would be quicker for me to carry out the tasks manually than to wait for the current BRFA group to slowly agree with my requests. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 22:09, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry that you feel that way, but complaining isn't going to help. Really. I don't know what you mean about "new" and "old" bot approvals groups, because there's only been additions; only Essjay (who was inactive) and Betacommand have been removed. There's just a lot of bots that need to be dealt with, and we have to be very careful about EVERYTHING. Much more than just manual editing. When letting a bot run, it's crucial that everything is perfect, because fixing it is TONS of work. —METS501 (talk) 22:14, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Please restore me.

Hi there, I actually was unable to build any more pages in the past couple months due to being busy. Because of that, I had not logged into my Wikipedia account. I'd like to be added to the roads pages again, because there are some articles I want to write or edit on Maryland roads. -Matt —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mattpedersen (talk • contribs) 17:47, 5 April 2007 (UTC).

Re-added to the newsletter list. However, you will need to re-add yourself to any projects. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 00:35, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

USRD Newsletter - Issue 5

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 5	5-8 April 2007	About the Newsletter
Departments: Features: Project news Good and Featured Articles are promoted Deletion debates Interstate 238 revert war Featured subproject IRC discussion comes to light Featured member From the editors
Archives  |  Newsroom   Shortcut : WP:USRD/NEWS

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. —Rschen7754bot 00:31, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

USRD Newsletter template coding error...

The template that delivers the USRD has a missing </small> tag that is wreaking havoc with my talkpage, probably others as well, and it looks like yours too. That should probably be fixed... Its right before your signature. When the tag is left unclosed, it propagates through the whole page. Just thought you should know, and can fix it before the next issue. Thanks for all of your work on this. I don't do as much editing on road articles as I used to, but I appreciate receiving the newsletter and keeping abreast of the project. --Jayron32|talk|contribs 16:03, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, HTML tidy has been tweaked a bit, so it won't automatically close <small> tags. I've fixed it here.  V60 ^{干什么？ · VDemolitions} 16:38, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

I fixed one here... Tomer^talk 03:46, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

USRD Newsletter - Issue 6

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 6	21 April 2007	About the Newsletter
Departments: Features: Project news Canada highway WikiProjects deleted Deletion debates Featured member From the editors
Archives  |  Newsroom   Shortcut : WP:USRD/NEWS

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. —Rschen7754bot 22:14, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

See...

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_U.S._Roads/Newsletter#Delivery_of_link_rather_than_content ... anything you can do to help greatly appreciated, it clutters up my talk page :) ++Lar: t/c 22:43, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

IRC

Thanks, next time I'll prevent my brother from going on. -- JA10 ^{T · C} 15:34, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

But, I'm still blocked..What's going on? -- 172.134.130.6 19:59, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

That statement above was me, I forgot to log in. -- JA10 ^{T · C} 20:00, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Vishwin has returned, pm him and he can fix it. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 05:02, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Road cruft

That stuff belongs on talk pages. I think you can agree with me that there is no excuse in the world for a Wikiproject to be named in a template used on an actual mainspace article. There may well be a need to use some cleanup template, but the mention to the project... has got to go. Sorry if you personally were offended. Matt Yeager ♫ (Talk?) 19:52, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Six-month block

Was a six-month block of 213.189.150.86 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) really necessary? The IP made one vandal edit and you blocked him six months. Yeah, yeah... so he had a previous block record. But still... -- tariqabjotu 04:09, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

I believe it was, since obviously he did not learn from his previous blocks. This shows that he has not learned anything, and this is to protect the integrity of Wikipedia. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 04:11, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Highway 99

Where I grew up (in the northern San Joaquin Valley), 99 is commonly known as "Highway 99", not "State Route 99". In this case, WP:USSH is misleading. By the way, Google searches show:

• 341,000 hits for "Highway 99" California
• 139,000 hits for "Hwy 99" California
• 45,000 hits for "State Route 99" California
• 41,000 hits for "SR 99" California

-- Jasper 04:46, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Then take it up with WT:USRD. Be forewarned, however, you will upset many people for bringing this up. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 04:48, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

USRD Newsletter - Issue 7

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 6	21 April 2007	About the Newsletter
Departments: Features: State updates Project news April 27 IRC meeting California Deletion debates MacArthur Maze Fire Illinois Featured member Circular route shields Pennsylvania From the editors
Archives  |  Newsroom   Shortcut : WP:USRD/NEWS

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. —VshBot (t • c) 19:17, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

WP:USSH

I don't think you meant to say "The infobox should use either the official name of the road which is not necessarily the same as the article title." That's an incomplete sentence, and I'm not sure exactly what's meant by it. There are some infoboxes that don't use the "official" name, such as New York State Route 15. I screwed that sentence up too though; sorry. --NE2 05:00, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Fixed, thanks for the warning. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 05:57, 7 May 2007 (UTC)