User talk:Rryan22

Recent edit to Xtranormal

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Xtranormal, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! TheQ Editor (Talk) 16:19, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Xtranormal shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Speedy deletion nomination of 5563AR64OPD34S

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 5563AR64OPD34S requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Flat Out let's discuss it 13:16, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Xtranormal Ryan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Xtranormal Ryan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hitro talk 14:39, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Xtranormal Ryan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Xtranormal Ryan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sarahj2107 (talk) 17:26, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Xtranormal Ryan, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Sarahj2107 (talk) 17:45, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Xtranormal Ryan, you may be blocked from editing. Sarahj2107 (talk) 19:50, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Sarahj2107. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:54, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to block from editing.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rryan22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Can i unblock please? Rryan22 (talk) 11:19, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No. And if you continue with more disruption when the block expires, you will be blocked for longer. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:23, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

as another admin has just said, no. You will need to wait until the block is over to return to editing. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:51, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Xtranormal Ryan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Xtranormal Ryan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:35, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Xtranormal Ryan. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:35, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to block from editing please. Rryan22 (talk) 08:41, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. Did you not see in your previous unblock request where I said "And if you continue with more disruption when the block expires, you will be blocked for longer"? Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:13, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't want to be blocked, stop creating that nonsense page. If you do it again when this block expires, your next block will probably be indefinite. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:14, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rryan22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Can i unblock from editing please today? Rryan22 (talk) 09:50, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No reason given for unblocking. (If you waste administrators' time with another unblock request which does not give any reason for unblocking you, then expect to have your talk page access removed to prevent further time wasting.) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:18, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I mean no offence, but your command of English seems very poor to me. You do not seem to understand what the problem is or what multiple people have been telling you here, your English on your user page is very broken, and the English in the article you keep creating is so poor that I have no idea what it is supposed to be about. If you are not a native English speaker, might you be better sticking to the Wikipedia in your native language? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:00, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Rryan22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Rryan22". The reason given for Rryan22's block is: "Disruptive editing".

Blocking administrator: Boing! said Zebedee (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: This is not just an autoblock, you are directly blocked, and you must not try to edit logged out while blocked. Your clear inability to understand the issues here is increasingly making me consider extending your block to indefinite, as you do not appear to possess the competence required to work on the English language Wikipedia. I'll stay my hand for now and give you one more chance when this block expires, but I have revoked your ability to edit this talk page for the duration of the block, as JamesBWatson warned you was likely to happen. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:30, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for evading your block and persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:50, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creating Draft:Xtranormal Ryan and doing this while logged out are absolutely not acceptable. I'm watching those articles and I'll see if you try to do it again, so just stop. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:52, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock|reason=Can i unblock from editing please? Rryan22 (talk) 19:59, 2 December 2016 (UTC)}[reply]

{unblock-auto|2=Disruptive editing|3=Boing! said Zebedee|4=7034856}

I have disabled your two unblock requests (invoking the "any reasonable admin" clause) and have revoked your ability to edit this talk page, as you clearly do not understand a word of what you are being told and you are wasting a lot of our time. Please stick to a Wikipedia in a language that you actually understand. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:05, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Editing logged out to get round the removal of your talk page privileges, as you did here, is not permitted. I have protected this page against anonymous editing to stop you doing it again. Your only chance of ever being unblocked here is to first learn English, and then when you can demonstrate sufficient fluency, make an appeal at WP:UTRS. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:43, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]