User talk:Rro4785

Welcome

Hello Rro4785, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard — a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia.

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

Community portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Rro4785, good luck, and have fun. --Aboutmovies (talk) 04:17, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Comparison of Object Pascal and C++

The article Comparison of Object Pascal and C++ has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This topic fails notability as a main criterion. It is original research. Since it lacks notability the fact that it is unverified is broadly irrelevant. Despite the obvious hard work put into the article it has no place in Wikipedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fiddle Faddle 19:14, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Comparison of Object Pascal and C++ for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Comparison of Object Pascal and C++ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of Object Pascal and C++ until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fiddle Faddle 20:33, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of EffiProz

The article EffiProz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Software with no indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TexasAndroid (talk) 12:49, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Hello, I'm Codename Lisa. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Tupi (software), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Codename Lisa (talk) 04:24, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, pal. Just make sure you include a citation when you re-add it. Happy editing. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 21:02, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rro4785 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. Place any further information here. Rro4785 (talk) 02:36, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; you need to give us your IP address and/or the exact block message so we can find your block. Yamla (talk) 12:03, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

IP for unblock

Hi!

I hope you can help me.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rro4785 (talk • contribs) 02:47, 10 July 2016‎

Ping Yamla, Slakr. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 05:07, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, 196.168.1.103 is your local address, not your Internet access. But the screenshot you posted (which you are now free to delete) showed your IP address. I took a look at the block; it looks like that address used to be an open proxy but it's a dynamic address and is no longer serving as a proxy. That is, the block was legitimate but is no longer accurate, and all but certainly was placed when someone else had your Internet address, so it was never targeted at you or your computer. I have lifted the block. You should be good to go now. --Yamla (talk) 12:01, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Integrated development environments for Java

Template:Integrated development environments for Java has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Codename Lisa (talk) 02:56, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of XWT (Mono)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on XWT (Mono), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of http://omidid.com/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jamiebuba (talk) 06:49, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]