User talk:Rrfay687

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Rrfay687/sandbox

A tag has been placed on User:Rrfay687/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — fortunavelut luna^{Rarely receiving pings. Bizarre.} 07:31, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

• Hi RHaworth - the sandbox is actually a note/working page for one of the students in the Wiki Education program. I was wondering if you would be willing to restore it or if you would be OK with me e-mailing him the content instead. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:35, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

• Restored - Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi please note.

Rrfay687, the Wikipedia motto is be bold - instead of talking about changes at Talk:Indian Solar Loan Programme, go ahead and do them! That is the first thing that this course should be teaching you! — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:01, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

@RHaworth, Rrfay687, and Shalor (Wiki Ed): Thanks for the ping, RH, noted. Rrfay687, apologies! @Shalor, just a suggestion; when the edits involved are not immediately obvious as germane to a course (this, at first glance, could have been Jeremy Corbyn's notes for a speech!!!), is there some way of advertising it more, for the simple amng us? -me, of course :) I looked at the userpage at the time, but there was nothing there (a notice has now, belatedly! been emplaced) to advise. Many thanks all, and Rrfay687, good luck with your work, and apologies again. — fortunavelut luna^{Rarely receiving (many) pings. Bizarre.} 20:10, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

• Hi Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi! Normally there's a sandbox template that says that it's a student page or at least something on the student's userpage that identifies them as such. I'm not sure why it didn't appear in this situation. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:31, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Okie's Peer Review

I would suggest incorporating scholarly sources and rephrasing/rewording the beginning to define the program more explicitly. Overall, it gives a good introduction to the origin/history of the program and significant impacts it has made. These could be further discussed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Okim12 (talk • contribs) 04:58, 29 November 2017 (UTC)