User talk:Royalblood001

Khan Haji Faqeera Khan Swati moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Khan Haji Faqeera Khan Swati. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and does not comply with WP:BLPSOURCE. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 21:08, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Haqooq-e-Khalq Party

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Haqooq-e-Khalq Party, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. •Cyberwolf• 23:23, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah This page have some issues but this page must not be deleted as It is the registered political party of Pakistan. Royalblood001 (talk) 23:27, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes those issues have been solved •Cyberwolf• 23:48, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Haqooq-e-Khalq Party

Hello, Royalblood001

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username IceBergYYC, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Haqooq-e-Khalq Party, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|IceBergYYC}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

IceBergYYC (talk) 06:58, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dodi Khan moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Dodi Khan. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Paul Vaurie (talk) 22:22, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Royalblood001! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Wikishovel (talk) 23:09, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Hello, I'm Wikishovel. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Dodi Khan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 23:10, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dodi Khan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 23:27, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dodi Khan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dodi Khan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:33, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Gibari Sultan per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gibari Sultan. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

--Blablubbs (talk) 14:56, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can tell you everything. I looked at discussion and now literally I am laughing on you people how seriously you people have taken it lol. So basically yes there are 2 groups both from same tribe but enemies of each other. And one more thing there is no master and puppet. In real life there are fights between these two families which have Larger population so Yes There are many users having same agenda Royalblood001 (talk) 21:30, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

and please don't put me in puppets of Sek47 group. Keep me in Khan of Naral group. It's disgrace for me to be called puppet of those who have no value lol. Royalblood001 (talk) 21:36, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

and Why I am blocked? I never did puppetry of anyone. I was contributing on my behalf. I was making other pages unrelated to this and I have nothing to do with the last fight between Khankhail Swatis and Tanolis so Why meeee???? I never removed content of anyone instead I was adding on mybehalf because they were adding of them only and I was adding notables from our side It doesn't mean I was doing puppetry of anyone Royalblood001 (talk) 21:56, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Royalblood001 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why I am blocked? I never did puppetry of anyone. I was contributing on my behalf. I was making other pages unrelated to this and I have nothing to do with the last fight between Khankhail Swatis and Tanolis so Why meeee???? I never removed content of anyone instead I was adding on mybehalf because they were adding of them only and I was adding notables from our side It doesn't mean I was doing puppetry of anyone. Rest on my talkpage in comments I explained the fight between two groups but I was just adding not removing their content. I was neutral

Decline reason:

Confirmed sockpuppetry. Yamla (talk) 22:03, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Royalblood001 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear admins! It is requested that please reconsider the matter on my block. I know the editing I made was like to be in support of a group but I never made vandalism or I added incorrect content. I was just doing it for my behalf as I was not doing to prove my content. If any editor would had removed my content I never added that again. There are two groups one is Khankhail Swatis and other is Jehangiri+Arghushal+Aznali+Sarkheli (All are Swatis). And there is no link between editors. In real life all are relative but we really don't know each other as there are no names written. Further I never removed content of opposite party. I just added for my side without talking to anyone. I am on Wikipedia for making editing to other articles except swatis because I am a Socialist and have wide information about other things. If my editings on this topic are considered biased and puppet of any group First of all I assure you all If you give me a chance I will not make edits on this topic ever again. I need one last chance. Thank you

Decline reason:

My use of the checkuser tool confirms that you have abused multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 10:56, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Royalblood001 (talk) 22:17, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dodi Khan

Hello, Royalblood001. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dodi Khan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:06, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Huzaifa Jamil Swati

Hello, Royalblood001. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Huzaifa Jamil Swati, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Huzaifa Jamil Swati

Hello, Royalblood001. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Huzaifa Jamil Swati".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:33, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]