User talk:Royal Free Citiy

Welcome!

Hello, Royal Free Citiy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Royal free city did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Kleuske (talk) 14:17, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry

Please remember you cannot edit articles. Borsoka (talk) 15:03, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When you lost a debate, you came up with your laughable sockpuppetry fantasy. --Royal Free Citiy (talk) 17:07, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No. When I read your messages on talk pages and in edit summaries, I realize who you are. All the same, you should stop editing. Borsoka (talk) 07:07, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is simply laughable.--Royal Free Citiy (talk) 16:14, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stubes99 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases.

September 2020

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from March Constitution (Austria) into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk🌴Help out at CCI!} 16:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Missing cite in Lajos Kossuth

You have added a short reference to "Phillips 1911" but no such source is listed in bibliography. Can you please add? Also, suggest installing a script to highlight such errors in the future. All you need to do is copy and paste importScript('User:Svick/HarvErrors.js'); // Backlink: [[User:Svick/HarvErrors.js]] to your common.js page. Thanks, Renata (talk) 04:24, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User was banned - sockpuppet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.111.19.2 (talk) 05:58, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]