User talk:RoyalEdits

This is RoyalEdits's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kasana (Clan) (December 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Deb was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please expand the article with additional references and fix the basic grammatical errors.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kasana (Clan) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Deb (talk) 09:36, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RoyalEdits! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Deb (talk) 09:36, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, RoyalEdits, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! NitinMlk (talk) 00:04, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose discretionary sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

NitinMlk (talk) 00:06, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Caste-related details of living people

Please note that the mention of caste at this project requires self-identification in the case of living people – see here for details. So add the caste-related detail only if the person self-identifies with it. Even in the case of non-living people, you need to provide a reliable source which mentions the subject's caste. Thanks. - NitinMlk (talk) 00:11, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please do not use fake references. E.g. here you cited Yu Taishan's article which talks about "Khotan", not "Khatana". Have a look at WP:NOR. Lastly, caste-glorifying publications are not reliable sources. utcursch | talk 17:50, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Hello, I'm Ravensfire. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Mian Muhammad Bakhsh that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please don't insult other editors, even in edit summaries. You can disagree with their edits without stooping to juvenile insults as you did here and here. As you expect others here to treat you with respect, you must show that same respect to them. Ravensfire (talk) 22:27, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of Gurjars, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please take some time to read the Reliable Source page to help you better identify what is a good source. In particular, sites with user generated information, like Wikipedia itself, are not good sources. You need to use good quality, secondary sources. You can sometimes use the wikipedia pages for a person to identify possible sources, but please remember to evaluate them first. Some articles do have bad sources - not every site that comes up in a web search is reliable! Ravensfire (talk) 18:06, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Non-reliable sources for caste related pages

Please note that your persistent changes to Gurjar page to add images from sources which are not considered WP:RS has been reverted. Please see Talk:The_People_of_India annd avoid adding information from such sources. The references should reflect the original source and should maintiain WP:NPOV and avoid pushing POV. History quester (talk) 01:21, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Intsar Khatana per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Intsar Khatana. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 00:51, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RoyalEdits (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, Respected Sir! You blocked me and gave the reason that I am a sockpuppet of Intsar Khatana. I have no link with Intsar Khatana, this is my only account. It is totally misunderstanding may be due to have same IP. Apparently, I have researched Intsar Khatana has already blocked user. How can I be sock puppet of a blocked account? This is my only account becuause I understand Wikipedia multiple account policy. Please unblock me, I swear this is my only account. God Knows!RoyalEdits (talk) 05:10, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm persuaded by the behavioral evidence at the SPI. Just too many coincidences there. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:17, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RoyalEdits (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sir, In the past I was blocked for having multiple accounts and I suffered so much for that reason but Now I have only one account which I am using according to Wikipedia guidelines. So, sir please consider my request, this time I am at the right.

Decline reason:

Just a few hours ago, you were telling us you didn't have multiple accounts. Now you are telling us you did. One or the other statement has to be untruthful as they are contradictory. This doesn't help your case. Probably your only option at this time is to go six months with zero edits, then apply under WP:SO. You will need to address your abuse of multiple accounts and your attempt to mislead us about this. Yamla (talk) 12:42, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Concern regarding Draft:Kasana (Clan)

Hello, RoyalEdits. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kasana (Clan), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:03, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]