User talk:RoxyT20

This is RoxyT20's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nadeeka Jayawardana (April 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Notcharizard were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nadeeka Jayawardana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- NotCharizard ^🗨 08:27, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RoxyT20! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- NotCharizard ^🗨 08:27, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Nadeeka Jayawardana has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nadeeka Jayawardana. Thanks! –Novem Linguae (talk) 08:33, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

He is a famous artist in our country and there is no page him in wikipedia. That's why I created it. How can anybody create a wiki page for an artist? Please let me know. Thank you! RoxyT20 (talk) 10:08, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are using the correct process, but you need to make the requested changes by editing Draft:Nadeeka Jayawardana, then resubmitting. 1) Add citations. See HELP:CITE. Basically you need to add stuff like <ref>https://www.newspaper.com/article</ref>. 2) Read and implement the comments I gave here. Hope this helps. –Novem Linguae (talk) 10:17, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Novem! I will do that RoxyT20 (talk) 10:55, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nadeeka Jayawardana (April 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MicrobiologyMarcus was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No substantial changes since previous submission. Please head previous advice before resubmitting and removal promotional tone.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nadeeka Jayawardana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 11:10, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Nilupul Kawinda

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Nilupul Kawinda, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 14:20, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I wrote an article about Famous Entrepreneur in my country.

I have seen many Wiki Pages for such people. So is it not possible to create pages for people like that?

Waiting for Reply. Thank you RoxyT20 (talk) 14:23, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nilupul Kawinda (April 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Wikishovel were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nilupul Kawinda and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wikishovel (talk) 15:35, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Subway (restaurant), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 19:05, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Colombo, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. Chanaka L (talk) 02:55, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't care about SEO. I know it's nofollow. I just added a cite for relevant info. It's not spamming. Please don't act like a big boss here. Next time I am gonna report you for being disrespectful for wiki contributors. RoxyT20 (talk) 08:54, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nadeeka Jayawardana

Hello, RoxyT20. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nadeeka Jayawardana, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:08, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]