User talk:Rowenamat

Welcome!

Hello, Rowenamat, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Rowena Green Matthews, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Karl 334 ^Talk-^-Contribs 18:30, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rowena Green Matthews

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rowena Green Matthews requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Karl 334 ^Talk-^-Contribs 18:30, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rowena Green Matthews

The article Rowena Green Matthews has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Acroterion (talk) 18:34, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've declined the speedy deletion (the earlier notice), since the qualifications noted are sufficient to pass the criteria for inclusion for academics and professors. However, Wikipedia policy requires that all biographies be supported by reliable sources, so please provide sources to support the article content, or the article may be deleted if no references are provided within ten days. We can help you with formatting the references if needed; please let me know on my talkpage if you need help. Acroterion (talk) 18:37, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've formatted a little bit and will fix some of those "title missing" error messages. Acroterion (talk) 19:35, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rowena Green Matthews may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

month=August|day=14|year=2013|time=18:34|timestamp=20130814183432|user=rowenamat}}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:24, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rowenamat, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Rowenamat! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

--Rowenamat (talk) 15:42, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Rowena Green Matthews has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

All refs listed are self-published sources. No reliable, verifiable sources that are independent of the subject.

Autobiography. If the subject is notable, someone will create an article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GregJackP Boomer! 14:26, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've declined this proposed deletion too. You clearly meet criteria 3 and 5, and probably others, of WP:ACADEMIC, and there's no prohibition of autobiographies: you've acknowledged that you understand it's discouraged. Third-party references are always preferred, though. Acroterion (talk) 15:40, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]